0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,636 Given: 40 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,176 Given: 2,306 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,176 Given: 2,306 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,983 Given: 2,435 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 44,343 Given: 31,140 |
Of course. My Ydna is Thracian.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,951 Given: 5,518 |
What about that Bulgarian/Thracian sample unusually norther shifted? I remember someone posted on forum.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,983 Given: 2,435 |
Centum/Satem distinction is thought of as meaningless today.
"It is no longer thought that the Proto-Indo-European language split first into centum and satem branches from which all the centum and all the satem languages, respectively, would have derived. Such a division is made particularly unlikely by the discovery that while the satem group lies generally to the east and the centum group to the west, the most eastward of the known IE language branches, Tocharian, is centum."
Fortson, Benjamin W. (2010). Indo-European Language and Culture: An Introduction. Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics (2nd ed.). Chichester, U.K.; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,983 Given: 2,435 |
It's meaningless because there was no obvious linguistic/cultural divide between the languages classified as centum and satem, as originally thought.
And let's not forget my point: Thracian names were distinct from Slavic names, not just because they used the "s" suffix for their names, like the Greeks. Thracians used the Greek alphabet, and probably the same spelling rules, that's why they have the "s" at the end.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks