?Polish or Romanian?

[Cumansky]

Both Poles and Russians call any trace of Med Gypsy. This has been culturally fanned for generations.

Vlachs have Iranic genes from mixing with Jasz people in middle ages, atleast the Vlachs from Romania not sure about Balkan history Vlachs.

[Cumansky]

We have the same word "ciganiti" and it means similar - to make yourself look bad/not fair.

I remember you call my parents both Cyganie, but my cousin "Serb" lol

[Satem]

Her name is Milena

Beautiful name, only when I hear this name I think about this song lol

[Cumansky]

It's deeper than that.
We also have our own preferences but we don't call North Slavic looks Eskimo.

Both Poland and Russia had the intent of conquering the Romanian principalities and the gypsy label was meant to diminish the enemy (sort of untermensch label). In the case of governorate of Moldova, it was an incentive to assimilate into East Slavs.

We didn't have intent, we straight up owned you, lol

[Viridian1]

Beautiful name, only when I hear this name I think about this song lol

I was about to say fck no but the beat is good

[Cumansky]

We still since the end of communism consider Romanians as worse, even Roma people (Romowie) commonly are confused with Romanians. I mean that ignorant people do it because the clever ones know things and never look down on other nations. We also usually don't like Russians as mixed with Mongols behaving like cavemen that used to rape our women, children and chicken during Polish-soviet war and WW2. And from the other hand we had very good relations with Romania before and during WW2.

Good relations with Romania in the war? You don't know Zloty Pociag? Romanians intercepted our train at the border and stole big part of our gold reserves before it got sent by Black Sea

[ixulescu]

We didn't have intent, we straight up owned you, lol

Poland tried but failed.

Occasionally Moldova had a similar arrangement with Poland to the one with Hungary - it got Polish troops in wars against Ottomans in exchange for vasselage. It worked well for both parties, because it kept wars with Ottomans far from Poland, and increased the strength of Moldovan armies.

The most influence Poland had in Moldova was during the so-called "boyars wars" (early 17th century).

[chociprasa]

Polish.

[Cumansky]

Poland tried but failed.

Occasionally Moldova had a similar arrangement with Poland to the one with Hungary - it got Polish troops in wars against Ottomans in exchange for vasselage. It worked well for both parties, because it kept wars with Ottomans far from Poland, and increased the strength of Moldovan armies.

The most influence Poland had in Moldova was during the so-called "boyars wars" (early 17th century).

You talking BS as usual.

First of all, no Romania existed until late 19th century. Poland existed in 966 AD.

Poland owned Transylvania in the past, also you were owned by Golden Horde (Cossacks aka Ukrainians), Kingdom of Hungary (Vlachs and Magyars), Bulgarian Empire (Bulgars), who else oh yes your main suppressors Ottoman Empire (Turks). Also in the lands of Romania lived large population of Jews, Romas, Germans.

Moldova was vassal state of Poland yes, because our nobility founded that principality. If we need to use this buffer region to defend from Ottomans that was necessary move at the time.

[ixulescu]

You talking BS as usual.

First of all, no Romania existed until late 19th century.

This is as dumb as saying no Poland existed before 1918.
Romania is a successor state to the Romanian medieval principalities. And unlike Poland, Romanian states were never wiped off the map.

The rest of your post is equally trash.