| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 11,113 Given: 10,158 |
Serbian Empire.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 6,667 Given: 5,726 |
Originally Posted by Ayetooey
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 21,115 Given: 11,127 |
Byzantines by far. Ottoman influence on the world was overwhelmingly negative.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 11,836 Given: 7,303 |
Same shit different colour
qpAdm: Bulgarian_1.DG= 77 - Kimak.SG= 23, p= 0.36, se= 0.31.
Y: Q-L330 > Q-YP771 > Q-BZ180 > Q-F16045* (F15008*) --> Baikal N, Altai MLBA, Aldy-Bel, Pazyryk, Hun.
MT: K1a --> Iron Gates, Starcevo, Bulgaria N, Bulgaria CA, Bulgaria BA.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 4,385 Given: 1,891 |
Personally I don't think the Ottomans are the successors of the Byzantines. They modified and adopted some things from the previous rulers but their culture is still pretty different from Byzantines.
Some of my threads:
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 207 Given: 0 |
Byzantines
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 3,596 Given: 409 |
This was a continuation and not a difference. Bizantines = Ottomans, this was the Balkano-Neareastern core region of the Oriental world (the counterpart was the Perso-Mesoporamian) since the Hellenism.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 2,431 Given: 241 |
You can’t decide which had greater impact eh?
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 10,853 Given: 26,190 |
That's your cute narrative to justify your oriental slavic, uralic and magyar(turkic) origin. I spit on Hungarian culture.This was a continuation and not a difference. Bizantines = Ottomans, this was the Balkano-Neareastern core region of the Oriental world (the counterpart was the Perso-Mesoporamian) since the Hellenism.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 4,385 Given: 1,891 |
What's the point in making threads if not asking for other people opinions?
Some of my threads:
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Türkiye
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks