1
Thumbs Up |
Received: 19,496 Given: 36,938 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,708 Given: 8,357 |
24 million must be the whole number of European immigrants that came to the US, but with less industrial growth, you probably see far less immigration and it would not be all Iberiian. Italians would be one of the big groups just like in the Souther Cone region and I think Germans and others would come in fairly large numbers too.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 19,496 Given: 36,938 |
Another possible scenario is that it would be like another Argentina, but with many Irish immigrants as well (ie mostly Euro descent, but also with many harnizos and castizos, and the European descent people being mostly of Spanish, Italian and Irish descent, plus some few German towns here and there).
All of them Speaking Spanish, of course.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,708 Given: 8,357 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 19,496 Given: 36,938 |
Because I think that overall, the process of mixing, but also receiving tons of European immigrants, in part, due to the temperate climates, would have been very similar to the southern cone. I will elaborate more on it on my response to your other post, tomorrow.
I think it would not be as white as Canada, but it would not be a typical mestizo country either, but more something like the southern cone.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,552 Given: 29,000 |
Why would there be more Irish? Irish would be more likely to go to other British controlled areas like others from the UK at that time. A lot of Irish would go to Australia, New Zealand that had Irish populations anyway. Irish didn't go in large numbers to South America for example.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,779 Given: 208 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 19,496 Given: 36,938 |
Because Irish massively immigrated due to famine, and even though they would have largely immigrated to British colonies like Australia and New Zealand; North America, due to its proximity to Europe would still have been another option. My logic tells me that only because of that reason, they would still have received more Irish immigrants than the southern cone (which is further away). And even Argentina received some Irish immigrants, anyways.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,552 Given: 29,000 |
Ireland was controlled by Britain so it is very unlikely that Irish would go en masse to a non-English speaking country. Also I doubt that Britain would be encouraging a large expat Irish community in a non-British area that was Catholic. They would all be going to Britain, Australia and New Zealand. Those were the countries that Irish immigrated to other than the US. They didn't go to non-British territories in large numbers. You didn't see Irish go in any great numbers to South America for example so I really can't see how a Spanish controlled US would be any different in that regard. The bulk of Irish would go to the Antipodes if there was no US. Irish immigration to Argentina was quite small with a low number of 7,160 and an upper limit of 45,000 to 50,000.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_Argentine
Thumbs Up |
Received: 19,496 Given: 36,938 |
Its okay, I was just speculating about a possible scenario. If you're right, then more likely the Euro descent people in North America would have been only mostly Spanish, or Spanish and Italian like in Argentina. There would have been some Irish immigration as well, but they would be like drops in an ocean of Spanish immigrants (or Spanish and Italian immigrants) like I said on a previous post. Hypothetical Spanish North America would still have received some more Irish immigrants than Argentina though.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks