Why do only Europeans and East Asians develop ethno states?

[Smeagol]

Aren't you 25% AJ?

A bit less (Grandfather approximately 3/4 Ashkenazi), but I always support doing the right thing which means i'm opposed to the Jews in every way.

[Kamal900]

I actually believe that Palestinians, both in Israel proper and the Occupied Territories, should be given full and equal Israeli citizenship. The idea that Israel must be exclusively Jewish is indeed a joke.

Longbowman doesn't agree with that. I mean, the UK is for everybody while Israel is only a nation for Jews. I mean, why Jews are still living in White nations for? Shouldn't they be gone to Israel or something? The double standards is sicking to say the least. Yes, Judaism is based on racial supremacy, and the end game of that "religion" is essentially world subversion over the gentiles.

[Kamal900]

Aren't you 25% AJ?

In Nazi Germany, Germans who have quarter of less of Jewish ancestry are regarded as Aryans, and Smeagol only identifies himself as a White American guy who is disgusted in seeing his own people's nation resorted to becoming a whore for another nation, Israel. There was a reason why the founding fathers were against any foreign entanglements to any alien nation.

[Kamal900]

Theres way too many non-whites in the U.S to establish that. I mean, what if Iran tried to establish a Persian-ethno state? Think about it, there would be anarchy everywhere.

The situation in America is completely different from Iran. While most of the non-Persian ethnic groups in Iran are natives to their lands, most of the non-Whites in America came to the nation after the opening of America's borders in 1965 by Jews and their henchmen which most White Americans greatly had opposed, and since then, the racial demographics of America has completely changed where Whites used to be over 90% in the nation from the 60's down to less than 60% today in two generations only. America was a nation for White people, and the founders were not apologetic about that. Now, it's nothing more than a shell of it's former self.

[TheForeigner]

Arab states are also "ethno-states" of sorts, but the older and correct term is "nation-states" and "nation" traditionally meant a people, not a country or state. A nation-state also doesn't have to be ethnically "pure" or with no minorities, like some morons here suggested. Also trying to disqualify classic nation-states like France or Italy, for having regional languages and dialects is the hight of stupidity and ignorance. A nation can be made-up of more than just one ethnic group. For instance white Americans used to be the real historical American nation and they were a mix of ethnicities and so are the French too or the Spanish. The clear opposte of a nation-state is a multi-national state like Austria-Hungary, Ottoman Empire or Tsarist Russia/Soviet Union.

[arkas]

Japan wasn't originally an ethnostate, multiple ethnic groups have lived in Japan and till this day some maintain a unique seperate identity from the mainstream Yamato derived Japanese identity, Ryukyuans and Ainus for example. Vietnam still has over 50 minority groups like Hmong, Cham and Khmer, China has countless minorities, so only the Korea's are ethnically homogenous. If you consider Vietnam to be an ethno-state, well Sri Lanka is about as ethnically diverse as Vietnam and they're 'Brown'.

Most modern day South Asian and Southeast Asian countries were formed by foreign colonial powers, prior to that many kingdoms were relatively homogenous. I disagree with the general statement implied in this thread's title, many 'Brown' people do create ethno-states. Had many of these regions had the choice, they would've been 'ethno-states'.

[TheForeigner]

Apparently this thread has become a vehicle for frustrated immigrants to deny the existance of anything like nation-states everywhere, because you see they have and always had minorities. Why don't you just return to your countries of origin, you bunch of retards?!

[Smeagol]

Japan wasn't originally an ethnostate, multiple ethnic groups have lived in Japan and till this day some maintain a unique seperate identity from the mainstream Yamato derived Japanese identity, Ryukyuans and Ainus for example.

Ryukyuans are considered to be ethnic Japanese by the Japs. The only other ethnic group in Japanese history are the Ainu who were seen by the Japanese in basically the same way Americans saw our Indians. Not as part of the nation.

[arkas]

Ryukyuans are considered to be ethnic Japanese by the Japs. The only other ethnic group in Japanese history are the Ainu who were seen by the Japanese in basically the same way Americans saw our Indians. Not as part of the nation.

Some Chinese even say Tibetans are the same as Chinese but it doesn't mean it's true.

[Smeagol]

Some Chinese even say Tibetans are the same as Chinese but it doesn't mean it's true.

Ryukyuans speak a Japonic language. They're slightly closer to the Ainu than other Japanese.