Mongoloid-ish looking Scandinavians

[Grace O'Malley]

Isn't a lot of this just trolling? What would be so wrong with looking Asian influenced or African influenced? Aren't we all just on a continuum anyway? Some European populations are more Asian influenced and some are more African influenced. Personally I'm a bit more Asian influenced but I find it interesting and nothing to be in denial about. I'm just interested in the deep genetics and history about European populations. It's all just most likely due to geography anyway. Personally as an Irish person I find it interesting in that Irish are more Asian influenced but I think this has more to do with Steppe influence. It would be nice if people could discuss this without baggage or prejudices. I think it has all to do with whether populations are more Neolithic or Steppe. I'm a bit more "Mong" influenced and I don't have any problems with that.

[Voyt]

I think it is common, not only in Scandinavia, but throughout Europe.

This is the truth; epicanthal folds and pseudo-folds are the inheritance of ANE-AncientNorthEurasians admixture; such admixture is most present in northeast Europe, but is only a few percentage points lower in northwest Europe, and is present least in north Africa and SubSaharanAfrica:

Sardinians, having no Yamnaya admixture, have no ANE admixture either, therefore.
Epicanthal folds can also be the result of EastAsian-proper admixture, which would have made its way to European lands via the Huns (who managed to get all the way to France), the Turkic Avars, and Ugric Magyars, and the Mongols. Finnic peoples also have epicanthal folds due to more recent admixture (recent meaning 3500 years ago) with Siberian natives, and seeing as proto-Germanics intermixed with Finnics in order to create the Germanic languages, they of course would have pseudo-epicanthal folds at higher rates than southern Europeans as well:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-07483-5
https://indo-european.eu/2018/06/pre...n-scandinavia/

[Gaditanian]

This is the truth; epicanthal folds and pseudo-folds are the inheritance of ANE-AncientNorthEurasians admixture; such admixture is most present in northeast Europe, but is only a few percentage points lower in northwest Europe, and is present least in north Africa and SubSaharanAfrica:

Sardinians, having no Yamnaya admixture, have no ANE admixture either, therefore.
Epicanthal folds can also be the result of EastAsian-proper admixture, which would have made its way to European lands via the Huns (who managed to get all the way to France), the Turkic Avars, and Ugric Magyars, and the Mongols. Finnic peoples also have epicanthal folds due to more recent admixture (recent meaning 3500 years ago) with Siberian natives, and seeing as proto-Germanics intermixed with Finnics in order to create the Germanic languages, they of course would have pseudo-epicanthal folds at higher rates than southern Europeans as well:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-07483-5
https://indo-european.eu/2018/06/pre...n-scandinavia/

Great post

[Gota_type_]

This is the truth; epicanthal folds and pseudo-folds are the inheritance of ANE-AncientNorthEurasians admixture; such admixture is most present in northeast Europe, but is only a few percentage points lower in northwest Europe, and is present least in north Africa and SubSaharanAfrica:

Sardinians, having no Yamnaya admixture, have no ANE admixture either, therefore.
Epicanthal folds can also be the result of EastAsian-proper admixture, which would have made its way to European lands via the Huns (who managed to get all the way to France), the Turkic Avars, and Ugric Magyars, and the Mongols. Finnic peoples also have epicanthal folds due to more recent admixture (recent meaning 3500 years ago) with Siberian natives, and seeing as proto-Germanics intermixed with Finnics in order to create the Germanic languages, they of course would have pseudo-epicanthal folds at higher rates than southern Europeans as well:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-07483-5
https://indo-european.eu/2018/06/pre...n-scandinavia/

About the stupidity of the map putting 1.5% subsaharan blood on Spaniards. Incredible manipulation. And the funny thing is that if we take Eurogenes results, all European countries score 1% or less "Subsaharan", which is the % of "subsaharan" that Spain has (0.5% or so). Putting just in Spain and not in the rest of Europe is a blatant lie. It is like saying that there were millions of blacks in Spain in the past. The retard that made that map should learn a bit about genetics. He clearle does not show it.

[Ymyyakhtakh]

Amanda Östervall (Swedish soccer player, superior chubby cheeks):

[MobyD]

I think it is common, not only in Scandinavia, but throughout Europe. The influence of the peoples of the east over the centuries has been constant, and has caused that in Europe, Mongoloid features are accepted as their own (when they are soft).

Norway:



Spain:

What’s the second guy’s name?

[Urbanuss]

Imagine white supremacists reading this thread...

[Cristiano viejo]

Imagine white supremacists reading this thread...

As a white supremacist, I can not laugh harder

[MobyD]

As a white supremacist, I can not laugh harder

Why would you admit to being a white supremacist?

[Cristiano viejo]

Why would you admit to being a white supremacist?

Because I am one, what question is that??