1
Thumbs Up |
Received: 15,592 Given: 8,909 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 15,592 Given: 8,909 |
I'm not familiar with Laag, he doesn't seem to care about DNA and I don't care about taxonomy, so our paths don't cross. But as a general rule Russians online tend to speak poor English and have weird views, some are absolutely ridiculous (remember Lyssy, he was from Ukraine but Russian-speaking).
Thumbs Up |
Received: 738 Given: 1,145 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,158 Given: 4,510 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 52,721 Given: 43,621 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 52,721 Given: 43,621 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 15,592 Given: 8,909 |
An average ethnic/Slavic Russian would be something like this Russian-American woman I once posted. She is 37.5% Southwestern Russian (Kursk), 25% Northern Russian (Kostroma), 25% some other Russian (perhaps Southern, not sure) and 12.5% German from Poland. German ancestry in Russia is not as rare as one would think, there were 2 million Germans in the Soviet Union. Her German seems to have been heavily Eastern Euro, not Dutch-like.
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...tryDNA-Results
Her GEDmatch is overall very average, I would say as someone who has seen like 200+ Russian and Slavic results.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,158 Given: 4,510 |
Your original argument was that Russians absorbed a Finnic element, I responded by saying there was very very few people to absorb, as evidenced by most Russians clustering with the source Slavic population (Belorussians/Ukrainians). I wrote that even the south-Slavs after Justinian's plague and political upheaval brought by the Avars still had more people to absorb than Russian proto-east-Slavs when settling Russia.
You seem to just be an egocentric poster looking for a debate to stroke your ego. I am way more mature than you.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 52,721 Given: 43,621 |
Because your arguments are false. Native population of Russia was already northern European and closer to Slavs than native population of Balkans, which was different world genetically.
Russia is full of Baltic toponyms and hydronyms for example, where did these Baltic tribes dissapear?
Baltic people are closest to Slavs and they were always genetically similar, but Balts are not Slavs. It's like saying British Islanders are pure Germanic just because native Britons were already genetically NW Euro and pretty close to Anglo-Saxons.
Baltic cultures in purple
Map of the ancient Baltic homelands at the time of the Hunnish invasions (3rd-4th c. AD). Archaeology identifies Baltic cultural areas (in purple). The Baltic sphere originally covered Eastern Europe from the Baltic Sea to modern Moscow.
Baltic tribes in 13th century
NE Slavs absorbed Balts, not only north Russians but NE Poles and much of Belarusians too. Deal with it.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 15,592 Given: 8,909 |
Finno-Ugric people seem to have a lot of IE ancestry, I guess they would have adopted Uralic at some point and stopped speaking IE. Of course there was some mixing too. Mordovians are about 10% Mongoloid, some even less than that. Obviously they weren't transplanted magically from Siberia, lol. Just like Estonians are only 2-5% Mongoloid or so, obviously mostly Finnicized local NE Europeans.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks