0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 66 Given: 8 |
In an ethnographic sense, let aside modern Bulgarians, even Tatars, Kazakhs, Yakuts or even Old Bulgars were not Turkish. Turkish in an ethnic sense refers only to Oghuz people.
Actually history is a science, which is based on evidence however you, being a modern ''Bulgarian'' deny the fact that you are closest to Serbs.
Nominalia isn't only evidence, in their early era, Bulgars were also referred to as Huns by Greco-Roman sources. The title Khan and Tengrianist religion are totally absent among the Iranians. Those are seen only among the Turks and the Mongols, with some Uralic exceptions. We shall not rewrite history and fabricate stories just to please modern ''Bulgarians'' and pretend the Old Bulgars were Sarmatian. I see no point in further discussing with people having biased views and who can not face reality. Good evening.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,896 Given: 1,003 |
When the old Bulgarians embraced Christianity and their rulers began to call themselves kings and emperors, that's how it changed them. I told you that the old Bulgarians do not have a Khan title registered, and the Tengri cult does not have any data for the whole pagan period of Danube Bulgaria. The iconic pagan shrines of the Proto-Bulgarians are different from the Tengri and what is left and can be seen in Bulgaria in the area around Pliska. I do not deny the fact that modern Bulgarians are close to the Serbs, and this is normal given that Bulgarians and Slavs began to mix gradually from the middle of the 9th century. Christianization, which makes the same difference, is most strongly influenced by this. Not too much of the time, present-day Serbian lands and the entire western Balkans were part of the Bulgarian medieval state. With the advent of the Ottomans in the Balkans, there were mass migrations of populations from the eastern Balkans to the west, far from the invaders. Throughout the Ottoman rule of the Balkans there were movements of large masses of people from east to west and back, from north to south and back. The reasons were different - economically, politically related to another war of the Ottomans, internal problems in the empire, which always had a bad impact on the Christian population, displacement of people in Anatolia for punishment / exile /. If you expect to find a population today with the same genetics as it did 1000 or 1500 years ago, I don't think you will succeed. You write the history of your people, and leave it to the people who know the subject about the history of the Bulgarian people.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,808 Given: 13,753 |
sorry ...but seems you do not know what you are talking about if that was a serious comment ?
Hungarians didnt get big influence from Gypsies ... other way around in terms of music - language.
Hungarian language has nothing to do with Mongolian language , btw Italy has more middle east genetic than Hungary or Bulgaria.
https://vocaroo.com/1f1IYpCqGQPy
one thing I can tell you is you got to be free
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,656 Given: 332 |
They originated somewhere around the river Volga
Volga -> Bolga -> hence the ethnonym Bolgar -> Bulgar
Non Auro, Sed Ferro, Recuperanda Est Patria (Not by Gold, But by Iron, Is the Nation to be Recovered) - Marcus Furius Camillus (Roman General)
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,668 Given: 1,754 |
Hungarian Language has nothing to do with Europe..
Your country and Scandinavia -with all your insignificant cultural background - could vanish immediately and nothing would change in Europe .
I consider this a cultural European forum.. And you.. genetically and cultural speaking... have almost zero contritution to Europe.
It is strange.. this forum is full of people who are completely alien to european culture..
95% percent of all the European significant figures can be enclosed in an area that does not include Russia, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Spain, Portugal, the Balkans, Poland, Hungary, East and West Prussia, Ireland, Wales,..
And don't forget that this map has been "designed" by an anglosaxon.. who is known to not "love" Italy..
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,668 Given: 1,754 |
The question should be: How much Italian is the European core ?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 14,828 Given: 13,088 |
In terms of Modern Europe, the biggest players are Germany, France and England.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks