Why is Anglo-British-American culture so anti-prostitution?(It seems like it solve their problems)

[Black Panther]

This is something that always confused me.
Pay an escort: Since it rangers let's just say $500/1hr, that's guaranteed sex.
Meanwhile nightclubs: $50, Gas/Uber: $30, Drinks: $40. That's $160, just to be in the common area of the nightclub. Meaning that just to have access to women. This does NOT guarantee you will get laid, at all. Most likely you'll be in the common area with mostly dudes. If you want to improve your status and be around women, you will have to get a table $1500. That's already 3 times as much as paying for guaranteed sex.At the same time, say you only go out on the weekends(as most professionals do) twice a week just to have the opportunity to talk to a girl that's already 1280 a month, which doesn't guarantee sex. It's crazy guys can be tricked into paying the pimp(the club) all this money for his hoes(most of the girls there) to be mean and bitchy to him

Bro. With 500 dollars, you could literally have 5-6 Brazilian hotties sucking your dick, lol. US pussy is overpriced, whether we're talking about professional hoes or not.

[Black Panther]

That's a lot. In the US, you can get a good one for $200 - $250 an hour.



I used to go to a goth/BDSM themed club in Madison, WI weekly or bi-weekly for several weeks. I got laid one time with one girl, then met a hot, Greek girl that I almost made out with, but blew it because my studio was messy and I didn't take charge and make her feel comfortable. I must've gone at least 10 times, spending at least $50-$60 each time. So, I got laid once (supposing I got lucky with that Greek chick, that would pump it up to a whopping 2 times) per $500 - $600.


$1500 for a private table? I've never heard of such a thing. That would never be worth it. Maybe you mean $400 for VIP bottle service in a private room for ~ 1 hour at a strip club where sex/a bj is never guaranteed? Indeed, oftentimes girls will ignore you, or be rude or roll their eyes at you. People in the US always try to prove how cool they are by pretending they don't want sex. They say, 'I'm here to drink, dance, and hang out with my friends...' when they could've invited their friends to their home and had cheaper/better booze and better music. Usually what people call social skills just means knowing how to deceive and navigate through the system of controlled deception/lying that is interacting with other people at bars/clubs in the US. Clubs are only good for meeting new people, but are never good for guaranteed sex. Then you have the problem of having to compete with rival males for women's attention and the music is usually so loud, you can't get a word in edgewise to have a comfortable conversation. Now that I'm 33, I hardly ever go to clubs anymore. I don't have the energy.

Clubs are overrated as a means to get a girl from 0. I only go to clubs if I am hanging out with my best buddies or already have a girl with me.

[Duffmannn]

Bro. With 500 dollars, you could literally have 5-6 Brazilian hotties sucking your dick, lol. US pussy is overpriced, whether we're talking about professional hoes or not.

Even brazilian ones are expensive.

[Black Panther]

Even brazilian ones are expensive.

If you consider 70-100 dollars expensive, sure... And you can find good quality pussy for even as low as 50 dollars in some towns or city districts.

[kratz]

Bro. With 500 dollars, you could literally have 5-6 Brazilian hotties sucking your dick, lol. US pussy is overpriced, whether we're talking about professional hoes or not.

This. Honestly, there are guys paying $3500 to seduction/Pick up artist coaches to take them out to talk to girls, with ZERO percent guarantee that they'll get laid. To me that's crazy! No one in Latin America would pay anything like that. But that's just how American society works.

[Óttar]

This. Honestly, there are guys paying $3500 to seduction/Pick up artist coaches to take them out to talk to girls, with ZERO percent guarantee that they'll get laid. To me that's crazy! No one in Latin America would pay anything like that. But that's just how American society works.

In the US, women are the prize. With the advent of Tinder swipe technology women have the unequivocal upper hand. I know women, many of whom are nothing special, who have several lovers. In Eastern Europe, Latin America, and SE Asia, women watch their figure, and pride themselves on being domestically skilled.

[kratz]

In the US, women are the prize. With the advent of Tinder swipe technology women have the unequivocal upper hand. I know women, many of whom are nothing special, who have several lovers. In Eastern Europe, Latin America, and SE Asia, women watch their figure, and pride themselves on being domestically skilled.

This. What happens is that in US women, like luxury cars, expensive apartments are a commodity. This is a highly materialistic culture where the more you get the better. If on the other hand brothels would be widely available, then no one would care too much to get laid. But American society the scarcity and the demand is what makes most people working and working for things they don't need. You need more women, more cars, more food, more money. If you a person is on the "loser" side then that sucks: people would think one is a loser, poor, no money, no cars. Meanwhile, if you are a "winner" you can manage to do all this things and live a much better life than most guys on other countries. The whole Pareto principle(80/20).

[Longbowman]

This is something that always confused me.
Pay an escort: Since it rangers let's just say $500/1hr, that's guaranteed sex.
Meanwhile nightclubs: $50, Gas/Uber: $30, Drinks: $40. That's $160, just to be in the common area of the nightclub. Meaning that just to have access to women. This does NOT guarantee you will get laid, at all. Most likely you'll be in the common area with mostly dudes. If you want to improve your status and be around women, you will have to get a table $1500. That's already 3 times as much as paying for guaranteed sex.At the same time, say you only go out on the weekends(as most professionals do) twice a week just to have the opportunity to talk to a girl that's already 1280 a month, which doesn't guarantee sex. It's crazy guys can be tricked into paying the pimp(the club) all this money for his hoes(most of the girls there) to be mean and bitchy to him

Several idiotic assumptions.

1) Clubs are free, or like, £10 entry. If you want to drink that's on you, but I, a teetotaler, have never bought a drink at a club. Granted, I go rarely, but still.
2) It's not about putting your dick in a hole. That's easy. It's about conquest. Buying it isn't conquest. Anyone can pay for it, that's not the test of a man.
3) Beyond conquest, many men want to prove they themselves are attractive to women. Renting a whore does not fill this void.

If you want to view it another way, there's 'quality of experience.' For example, I wanted to watch the rugby today. I could have achieved this by buying a tiny TV for £20. However, I in fact bought a much larger TV (obviously a while ago) with much better picture quality. In both cases, I watched the game, but for much more money, I had a qualitatively better experience.

People could pick on your suggestion, too. '$200 for a hooker? You know the homeless lady gives BJs for $20?' It's simply not about getting your dick wet. That is easy. It's about scoring the best looking girl you can, without resorting to the cheat options.

I'm sure you play videogames given your posting history. You know microtransactions? Most people don't like those because they feel it ruins the experience of getting to the end of the game by yourself. The whores are microtransactions. They're a quick way to a kind of end, but they miss the point of the experience.

Hope this answers your 'question.'

[kratz]

Several idiotic assumptions.

1) Clubs are free, or like, £10 entry. If you want to drink that's on you, but I, a teetotaler, have never bought a drink at a club. Granted, I go rarely, but still.
2) It's not about putting your dick in a hole. That's easy. It's about conquest. Buying it isn't conquest. Anyone can pay for it, that's not the test of a man.
3) Beyond conquest, many men want to prove they themselves are attractive to women. Renting a whore does not fill this void.

If you want to view it another way, there's 'quality of experience.' For example, I wanted to watch the rugby today. I could have achieved this by buying a tiny TV for £20. However, I in fact bought a much larger TV (obviously a while ago) with much better picture quality. In both cases, I watched the game, but for much more money, I had a qualitatively better experience.

People could pick on your suggestion, too. '$200 for a hooker? You know the homeless lady gives BJs for $20?' It's simply not about getting your dick wet. That is easy. It's about scoring the best looking girl you can, without resorting to the cheat options.

I'm sure you play videogames given your posting history. You know microtransactions? Most people don't like those because they feel it ruins the experience of getting to the end of the game by yourself. The whores are microtransactions. They're a quick way to a kind of end, but they miss the point of the experience.

Hope this answers your 'question.'

Agree to disagree. Lol, it seems you are playing 'Devil's advocate' in everyone of my threads.

Like in the case of the favoring a porn star over a gay son, I disagree with this one. My take is that when men have illegal prostitution they have to rationalize a way as to why they need to 'chase' women for sex. That's why this whole, 'conquest' is set up. If prostitution was widely available I think this "conquest" mindset would dwindle.

[RenaRyuguu]

It's not really against it seems the British were everywhere but in Victorian UK everyone had their place. We also had brothels for those who like that nothing special.