0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 15,666 Given: 13,081 |
I'll answer you point by point:
1) I didn't switch my definition either, I'm a man of honor. It was several male models listed on the net as dark blond that I listed in my survey as brown-haired and one they listed as light brown-haired I listed as blond (posted a link to his page in my thread, too). Also, contrary to the belief of some people here, models didn't score as blonder or lighter-eyed than average. This might be true only for some mixed race areas such as South America, for instance. In my Bulgarian sample scientists were blonder and lighter-eyed than models. In fact if there was a trend of any type dominating among male models, it was the tall, well-built, medium to dark brown-haired and usually dark-eyed type that did - I'd say this stereotype is praised in most of Europe, except for areas where this complexion is simply rare such as Scandinavia, The Netherlands and the Baltic states. Strongly Atlanto-Med, in other words.
2) I wasn't gonna mention Gypsies, since from what I've read you are an intelligent and unbiased person and know there's a huge difference between them and Euros and you wouldn't troll.
3) How big was your Bulgarian sample? I had 1001 men. Probably doesn't matter anyway, since unless blondism criterion is restricted to (nearly) ash blond shades (which Popov found among less than 2% of Bulgarians and I agree), there's no way that any region of my state scores so low (having travelled through it). I'd say my number of 10,99% is pretty in line with males hair colour reality.
I'm saying this with a pretty neutral discussion tone though. Not accusing you of anything as I respect you and it isn't only our Bulgarian results that differ or would do so. For instance, I saw 9,17% of male Croats as blond and found the same number for light brown hair. These results are also higher than yours. I'm pretty sure our data for Serbia and Hungary will also differ.
4) I respect your work, too. I'd like to see some more surveys from you, regardless of the topic.
5) You saw my results for Dutch of both sexes. I'm now doing Sweden and Hungary. Swedish women scored as just 1,6% lighter-eyed than Dutch ladies but nearly 8% blonder. I predict my Hungarian results may surprise some people here (some who thought they were darker) but I stand behind them.
After not shaving for a while:
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,195 Given: 677 |
Is it just me or is the screenshot for Medium/Light hair appear blonder than the one for Light hair?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 211 Given: 74 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 211 Given: 74 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,075 Given: 1,717 |
Blondes in the first 3 rows in order: David Lofquist, Fredrik Andersson, Simon Nilsson, Robin Stromberg, Sebastian Eriksson, Jesper Johansson, Jesper Modig, Victor Wernersson,
Unknown(couldn't find more pics, some were from lower level leagues): Christopher Viktorsson, Oskar Lundin
Was very easy to tell once you look at multiple pics, all those people look pretty similar in the first pics(although I was actually able to tell most, you can see the subtle shifts in the amount of yellow even in those pics, only one I got wrong on initial guess was David Lofquist), and the majority of pics for each person ranged from:
for brown haired people and
for blondes.
It's why it's so important to look at multiple pics.
Spanish blonde from my study: Alex Fernandez of Cadiz cf(although born in a suburb of Madrid which shows the problem of using top leagues for regional results)
Another one: Samuel Saiz of Gerone fc, from Madrid
Yeah, it is rare, that's why Spain is only 2.8% blonde, although they're far more common in Italy than Spain(you've posted a few clearly far lighter than Thelin yourself), but definitely a far cry from this ridiculous map(actually on second look those numbers aren't too unreasonable, around 2-2.5x mine which is a lot less than some studies and around my light hair numbers but the Alpine numbers are definitely massaged):
Yes, I have Atlanto-Spectrum numbers, thread about the rest of the phenotypes will be out later, PM me if you want them earlier(although they haven't moved much from when I showed you when I had the lower France sample size).
The Guanche skulls as a whole are unlike those of modern European Mediterraneans, and resemble northern European series most closely, especially those in which a brachycephalic element is present, as in Burgundian and Alemanni series.oldschool anthropologydivided them into clearly differentiated types, which include a Mediterranean, a Nordic, a "Guanche," and an Alpine. The "Guanche" accounts for 50 per cent of the whole on the four islands of Teneriffe, Gomera, Gran Canaria, and Hierro; the Nordic for 31 per cent, the Mediterranean for 13 per cent, and the Alpine
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,195 Given: 677 |
Your numbers on Belgium is only on Flanders? That would explain why so high...
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,195 Given: 677 |
Pt.2
Spoiler!
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,195 Given: 677 |
Pt.3
Spoiler!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks