*sipping tea* Oh, I didn't know you Turks hold such grudges, eh? let's see now. Nope, Turks are genetically more affiliated to central Asia than anything:
Uh, no. I think you're confusing Arabians with other Arabs. The Luwian Sea peoples played no relevance in world stage, and these people were long gone before the Turks ever arrived in Anatolia. And? The Sumerians were a middle eastern people who would have been genetically much differently from other middle easterners including Semites like the Akkadians that later on spawned Assyrians which they do exist today and Babylonians. 7abiby, the same can be said about the Roman empire where they took most of their art and culture in general from the Greeks. The same's true for Germanic and other "barbarian" peoples who later on inherited the cultural legacy of the Roman empire in the early middle ages. Such retardation knows no bounds. Here's a genetic results of Palestinian and Egyptian Muslims to illustrate things to your simple minded head:
As you can clearly see, Palestinians are more than 60% genetically Levantines/Israelites on average, 7.8% steppe, 4% pure east-African admixture and early admixture from Armenia and North Africa in contrast to Egyptians who are 50% Levantines, double the amount of East-African admixture, more Maghrebi blood and so on. We do have genetic results of the ancient Egyptians from the new kingdom and Ptolemaic periods which shows the same genetic structure as today's Egyptians who were less SSA and Arabian admixtures than they are today. Göbekli Tepe has nothing to do with any of us simply put that Anatolians genetically were much more similar to modern day Sardinians back in the neolithic period than to any modern day middle eastern group including Turks. About those dynasties, yes, they have nothing to do with Turks today because they were more closely related to modern day Kazakhs and other Kipchacks than to Oguz Turks such as yourself. That's like saying that modern day Germans claim that Anglo-Saxons, Franks and etc were Germans like them which is very deceptive because the modern day German ethnic identity did not exist back then. Turkic = Turkish, and you're just claiming other Turkic peoples as your own. The Mamlukis were a mixture of all kinds of ethnic groups namely Kipchacks, Circassians, Nubians, and even Albanians, Kurds, Armenians, Georgians and so on. The Ayyubids were a short lived dynasty but that doesn't mean it was insignificant. All these dynasties before the Ottomans had nothing to do with Turks or should I say the Seljuks that you're people descend from. Yeah, again, both Israelis and Palestinians hate to accept the fact that we too are also descended from the ancient Jews that did not migrate out of ancient Judea which later renamed as Syria-Palestina 2000 years ago. Hell, even Longbowman told me that my maternal haplogroup is found among the Israelite samples 2,000 years ago. Again, it's all due to politics, nothing more. The Sumerians were a people who vanished more than 4,000 years ago, but the Semites like the Canaanites and Eastern-Semites like the Akkadians and the Eblaites took over their legacy and becoming the oldest known civilizations in history.
And who can forget the Egyptians?
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/egypt--thebes--tomb-of-nakht--banquet-scene--tombs-of-the-nobles-91666586-a8eb4ca66931478bb9ec94ab36197678.jpg)
So in conclusion, we Afro-Asiatic which includes Egyptians, Semites, Berbers and so on and the non-Afro-Asiatic Middle Easterners were the oldest known people to have the oldest civilizations in history while the Greeks are the founders of western civilizations, and the Minoan kingdom of Crete was the oldest civilization in Europe's history. In other words, you Turks are pretty newcomers to our lands, nothing more. Oh, and about the Iraqi arabs, it depends. Northern Iraqi Arabs are genetically much more closely related to Assyrians and so on while it's the Southern ones are descendants from new coming Arabian migrants.
Originally Posted by Toppo900
Mostly? No. Half of their genome is central asian AKA Turkic with some Eastern Eurasian admixture in them, and those groups have been gone LOOOOONG before the Turks had arrived in the area around 11th century AD. Unlike those groups that you have mentioned, the ethnic identity of the ancient Nabateans did not phase out of the existance and becoming the 2nd largest ethnic group in the world, so go fish
Reply With Quote
Türkiye
Bookmarks