0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,819 Given: 5,369 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,306 Given: 1,198 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 15,591 Given: 8,909 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 29,829 Given: 24,541 |
Hmm, so basically, most White Brazilians have Amerindian and SSA admixtures? That's something North Americans wouldn't count as White in their viewpoint.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 15,591 Given: 8,909 |
In the US mixing between whites and Negroes was basically illegal up until the 1960s. On the other hand, didn't Brazil use to promote racial dilution of blacks and mulattoes as a way of getting rid of them gradually? I may be wrong of course, pardon my possible ignorance.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 29,829 Given: 24,541 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,306 Given: 1,198 |
Yeah, most have some admixture, usually below 10%. But this person has incredibly low admixture for a Latin American of colonial origins. Looking at GEDmatch she is at most 2-3% Amerindian and 0% SSA, hardly not white enough to White North Americans since even if it isn't common there are some of them scoring up to 10% non-European.
Most people with similar results in countries like Brazil, Argentina, Cuba and Uruguay have recent European ancestry, they are not fully from the colonial period and that's why these results are impressive. You cannot find easily such results among colonials in other Latin American countries, only in Brazil.
Argentina and Uruguay European input is mostly recent/post-independence. In the colonial times most people living in Argentina and Uruguay were balanced Mestizos not much different from Mexicans.
What makes such results interesting is that they belong to a fully colonial individual, I could post many Brazilians who are 100% or near 100% European it's not difficult to find.
You can find people over 95% European in Argentina, Uruguay and Cuba, but most of them come from recent migrations.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,395 Given: 890 |
In Colombia, where there´s a good number of white colonials (+85% euro), but there are scarce pure ones (+95%), the process of making the "criollos" was basically miscegenation superposing miscegenation: basically new arrivals of spanish men mixed with the previously yet mixed colombian women, the process is 1st generation: mestizo offspring, 2nd generation: offspring castizo, 3rd generation: offspring criollo, and a further 4rd mixing would create a pure white.
This process is specially strong in Medellin-Antioquia, where there was barely post-colonial migration and has a good amount of whites.
This also happened post-independance in Argentina-Uruguay, where there was also migration of women, but the proportion was 3-4 men for each woman.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,395 Given: 890 |
That´s the case in Brazil, also in countries with bigger whites populations as Argentina, Uruguay and a lesser extent Cuba (there was more segregation here), even in Venezuela where the european migration is recent, but in countries with long-time and reduced (elite only) white populations, as Mexico, Dominican Republic, Central American republics, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Chile or Bolivia, the miscegenation between whites and non-whites is basically 0, they could mix with castizos or octoroons as much.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks