0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 29,829 Given: 24,541 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,482 Given: 6,982 |
This is true, Celtic languages share some grammatical similarities with Hamito-Semitic.
Most likely explanation is that a large part of pre-IE Europe used to speak languages somewhat related to North-African Berberic before they were wiped out by Indo-European cultures. In other words, there used to be a continuum from the Middle East to the Atlantic
I suppose that the Celtic group, the earliest IE one to extend westwards, was influenced by the syntaxical structures of Hamito-Semitic. Then came the highly innovative Italic, Greek, Germanic, and (less so) Slavic groups, bringing along new grammatical features that gave birth to so-called "Standard Average European" and put an end to the previously existing continuum.
A legacy of the ancient situation is still to be seen in the surviving Celtic languages.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 29,829 Given: 24,541 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,441 Given: 1,541 |
Very interesting. It awakened up a curiosity on me whether ENF spoke a language closer to Semitic languages or not. Maybe, IE people couldn't change the languages of Pre-Celtic people as much as they changed the other parts of Indo-European lands.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 29,829 Given: 24,541 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,927 Given: 2,177 |
These similarities are only the case in modern Celtic languages. Old Brittonic, the oldest ancestor of welsh that can be distinguished from Irish and Gaulish, was more like Latin grammar as was Gaulish. I’d say that this is a case of linguistic convergent evolution combined with the sprachbund affect that makes languages in a close proximity similar.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 317 Given: 194 |
Vasconic languages too should be similar to Semitic ones in this case. I really wonder culture, genetics, phenotypes of those extinct people.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,927 Given: 2,177 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 317 Given: 194 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks