US American Imperialism and War crimes of the West

[luc2112]

From the fact that no one was able to bring communism to life does not follow that capitalism is a very good thing.

Everyone has already forgotten that in 1802 the Parliament of England was forced to adopt an act according to which children were forbidden to work more than 12 hours a day - "Working hours were limited to 12 hours a day, excluding the time taken for breaks. Apprentices were no longer permitted to work during the night (between 9 pm and 6 am)" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health...tices_Act_1802

In the past, the government was rightists and the opposition was the Christian church, it worked well. Nowadays in the West the church has lost its political strength, there has been social degeneration and the leftists are opportunistic or ignorant, only harm what is already one chaos.

[KMack]

It can work in places like Sweden even though most of the people on welfare are the migrants from the 3rd world which the taxation rates had gone up the roof according to my paternal uncle living in Sweden(he had been there since the late 70's). This is my uncle in the video btw(skip to 1:00):




Him younger:

Sweden is capitalistic. They do have higher rates of taxation to cover "free stuff" though.

[unseen]

In the past, the government was rightists and the opposition was the Christian church, it worked well.

I do not understand what do you mean.

Which countries? What a time period? What was the political opposition of the church to the government?

What/who "worked well"? Or do you mean that children who worked at night and worked more than 12 hours a day - "worked well"?

Nowadays in the West the church has lost its political strength, there has been social degeneration and the leftists are opportunistic or ignorant, only harm what is already one chaos.

Yes, I agree with this description of the situation.

[Leader]

I think the following definition will suffice for our forum:

By capitalist, I will primarily understand those countries whose national wealth is owned in parts (this will distinguish them from countries such as the USSR where the state owned all the resources and large enterprises of the country).

In capitalist countries, on the other hand, people are not, officially, divided into estates in accordance with the nobility of their origin (this will distinguish them from countries in which there are suzerainty and vassality and the division of people into classes).

That definition works. My opinion is that economic questions are important (I like capitalism) but are secondary in importance to questions about the purpose of a nation, and to the preservation of one's nation and race.

If I lived in Germany, my focus would be on reviving a Nordicist racialist and nationalist movement, and I would not talk to the people that much about capitalism versus socialism.

[unseen]

That definition works. My opinion is that economic questions are important (I like capitalism) but are secondary in importance to questions about the purpose of a nation, and to the preservation of one's nation and race.

This is the point of view of a well-fed person.

If you didn’t have the means to buy food for yourself and your children, then your priorities would be completely different.

If I lived in Germany, my focus would be on reviving a Nordicist racialist and nationalist movement, and I would not talk to the people that much about capitalism versus socialism.

Then tell us how, with the help of racism and nationalism, will you solve the economic problems of capitalism?

[Petros Houhoulis]

It can work in places like Sweden even though most of the people on welfare are the migrants from the 3rd world which the taxation rates had gone up the roof according to my paternal uncle living in Sweden(he had been there since the late 70's). This is my uncle in the video btw(skip to 1:00):




Him younger:

[Petros Houhoulis]

Sweden is capitalistic. They do have higher rates of taxation to cover "free stuff" though.

[luc2112]

I do not understand what do you mean.

Which countries? What a time period? What was the political opposition of the church to the government?

What/who "worked well"? Or do you mean that children who worked at night and worked more than 12 hours a day - "worked well"?

Yes, I agree with this description of the situation.

Dutch (but they were self-employed farmers). Germans, some German companies here in southern Brazil treat their employees well.


Note the German Generals of War 2, how Heinz Guderian and Erwin Rommel (former generals of Wehrmacht) they treated their soldiers well (contrary to the Hitler ordered).

I don't know British!