It's funny that the word animal among humans informally has a "bad word" aura about it, like "that's a big no-no. We're 'better' than that!" Or niggas, even the educated ones, be like "erm, you can't say that in certain environments and also don't you know that someone once said after this arbitrary set of circumstances happened that we're now 'better' than everyone else because of this or that speculative reason?"

Now I don't know nothing about who's more superior and who's not at all (definitely not the dumb-ass niggas still going on about this shit. Smh.) but here's Homo sapiens sapiens at its greatest: Intentionally spreading syphilis within/outside Tribe-land while saying you are providing cure, air raids within Tribe-land during "peace time," city square massacres within Tribe-land, continent-scale massacres, bringing up offspring only to send it to die in wars with Tribes not even in the same continent proximity. You also have your inventions, caring about welfare, well-being of others, and shit. (Doing quick maffs, "sapiens sapiens" here cancels each other leaving only a bunch of uppity "homos" lmfao.)

With that in mind, I put forward this cute little hypothesis to explain the humans' habit of going on about things or in garbage new-age language Why Does Evil Exist and Why Don't the Good Guys Win. To do that first Imma establish a motherfucking BP model of two forces: A B-force and a P-force.

B-force (PP):
P-force (PT):
  • Social grooming appears to be important in the formation and maintenance of coalitions.
  • Males maintain and improve their social ranks by forming coalitions, which have been characterised as "exploitative" and are based on an individual's influence in agonistic interactions.[68] Coalitions can also give an individual male the confidence to challenge a dominant male. The more allies a male has, the better his chance of becoming dominant. Chimpanzee alliances can be very fickle and one member may turn on another if it serves him.[70]
  • Male chimps practice infanticide on unrelated young to shorten the interbirth intervals in the females.[80][81] A community's dominant males sometimes restrict reproductive access to females.
  • Top-ranking males tend to be aggressive even during dominance stability.[66] With this, a dominant male is unsure if any "political manoeuvring" has occurred and must re-establish his dominance. During aggressive encounters, displays are preferred to attacks.[66][67]
  • Wage wars over land, not mates[75]; males patrol the borders of their territory, brutally attack chimps which had split off from the Gombe group. Hostile to males from outside the community. Parties of males 'patrol' for the neighboring males that might be traveling alone, and attack those single males, often killing them.[68]
  • Chimps also display signs of culture among groups, with the learning and transmission of variations in grooming, tool use and foraging techniques leading to localised traditions.[98]
Suddenly it all makes sense. Human is like the perfect combination of both, with P-force proclivities prevailing. All the "turf" wars over the years and niggas getting popped on all sides is within the predictable behavioral parameters for humans. You can be a Pious Patricia (or her alterego Cunty Catherine) and appeal to emotions by arguing about the very special unique place humans supposedly have but that's for another thread. Either way, it's interesting that P-force is also correlated with all technological advancements humans made so ironically if you knocked out humans' ability to murder each other technological advancement would slow down if not halt completely (many inventions today like the internet, satelites, microwave oven is military in origin but were repurposed later). Humans are neither an ascended animal, nor a fallen demi-god although they possess traits of both which is what makes humans the lovable schizophrenically suicidal existentialist misfits we all love and cherish today.