1
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,566 Given: 4,506 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 34,729 Given: 61,129 |
I think we all have our little things but this guy must be addicted to brutal anal gang-bangs because he is a sucker for punishment that keeps on coming back for more. Is this guy fucking retarded, or what ? Not even his fellow canines want anything to do with him ! He is like that fly flying into the window, thinking it will disappear and let him through.
Wake up and smell the coffee.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 142 Given: 149 |
You twos mental age combined dont even make a teenager.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 34,729 Given: 61,129 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 240 Given: 97 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,566 Given: 4,506 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,137 Given: 5,254 |
I think that everything is a little worse than you wrote.
Global capital, which owns almost every country at the moment, does not think by the categories of individual countries - borders only complicate the life of the "free market". The war in Ukraine brings enmity between Russians and Ukrainians (artificially divided single people), at the same time destroying the Slavic population, which is no longer needed as a working class, since these territories are considered only as resource colonies.
At the same time, full-scale anti-Soviet propaganda was launched (especially against Stalin), as the people began to realize that only a sovereign economy and social means of production could give development to our country (like any non-colonial non-parasitic one).
So that people do not think about such bad things, the government artificially maintains a low standard of living and constant depression among the population with the help of new taxes, the import of migrants and the adoption of anti-people laws. Global capital does not need a strong Russia, with an active middle class - this is too dangerous.
It seems to me that a repeat of 1917 is unlikely - corporations and their private armies will no longer allow nationalization of their private property. And the quality of the young generation is no longer that - they are no longer able to physically work, and they don’t want to. Everyone wants a beautiful life for nothing.
So for now, I am inclined to consider the confrontation between Russia and the West a very successful TV show, but I would like to be mistaken.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 33 Given: 26 |
Your G25 calculations are wrong, you are using overlapping population references from different time periods (ie mixing Bronze Age references and Iron Age, etc). Join Anthrogenica and make a post there, there are alot of people like you there of similar backgrounds. We will model you properly and put you on the relevant PCAs.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 142 Given: 149 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,566 Given: 4,506 |
Stalins' system was practical and threw the "multiethnic" character of the Soviet out of the window, with Stalin himself becoming the most efficient and effective Russian nationalist even, even if he was a Georgian!!! The problem was that his system was short sighted and could not outlive him. His bloody purges created stability at a terrible price, but of course the loss of stability which resulted to the collapse of the Soviet Union itself proved that his policies had a point after all. Russia definitely needs a lighter version of Stalinism, which is enforced as Putinism nowadays, but not even Putin could bring back Ukraine into the fold. The Ukrainians might be a hillybilly version of Russians for all intents and purposes, but they aren't willing to become enslaved to Russia particularly after the atrocious result of the Holodomor, and that was Stalins' fault my dear, whether you want to accept it or not. So, in effect Stalin lost Ukraine, and got sabotaged by the Ukrainian Krushchev after his death (who also stole Crimea from Russia at a later point).
Otherwise the "Neoliberals" are indeed sabotaging Russia the same way they sabotage everybody except China which is out of their control, but the western man fights back just as the Eastern man does, but far less effectively since the "system" has overrun him ideologically some decades now. I very much doubt that the "Global capital" can win this fight though, because its' policies are suicidal in the end of the day. The most "successful" result possible for them would be the collapse of the West and its' replacement by a westernized East, which won't be thinking "globalist".Global capital does not need ANY strong country. Russia happens to be one of those countries which are naturally strong. So is the U.S. of A. and Trump purports to fight back, but he is more or less part of the system himself.
So that people do not think about such bad things, the government artificially maintains a low standard of living and constant depression among the population with the help of new taxes, the import of migrants and the adoption of anti-people laws. Global capital does not need a strong Russia, with an active middle class - this is too dangerous.
The confrontation is between China and the West, because the Chinese men are still willing to physically work. Slowly but steadily the west is recovering too. If the French are willing to fight against Macron, they are most definitely willing to work as well, but there is no work for them right now since all the economy has moved to southeast Asia. It's just a matter of time...
It seems to me that a repeat of 1917 is unlikely - corporations and their private armies will no longer allow nationalization of their private property. And the quality of the young generation is no longer that - they are no longer able to physically work, and they don’t want to. Everyone wants a beautiful life for nothing.
So for now, I am inclined to consider the confrontation between Russia and the West a very successful TV show, but I would like to be mistaken.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks