Page 12 of 26 FirstFirst ... 2891011121314151622 ... LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 252

Thread: Belgians are usually not Keltic Nordic in appearance.

  1. #111
    Veteran Member Septentrion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 08:07 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    100% Northwest European and Flemish
    Ancestry
    From Flanders ( Koninkjrik België )
    Country
    Belgium
    Y-DNA
    R1a - L664
    mtDNA
    n/a
    Taxonomy
    60% Borreby with strong 40% Keltic Nordid admixture
    Age
    28
    Gender
    Posts
    11,264
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,188
    Given: 3

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rico33 View Post
    But that map doesn't say anything.
    And admixtures can be classified with whatever suits your ideology...

    The Belgian KN people should get a different name, as they are genetically closer to the Alpinid peoples of Eastern France and southwest Germany. They didn't get the looks by evolving in the mountains, by the way.
    You are confused. Why should Belgian Keltic Nordids get a different name? Belgium is not the only nation where the Keltic Nordid type is found by the way. In every nation, there are cases of admixtures nothing surprising. By the way you are yelling South-West Germany. Anthropological facts are that South-West Germany is the most Nordid part of Germany. It was nicknamed, “Old Frankish country”, in this part of Germany that the Frankish people settled strongly. The Ancient Franks were predominantly of the Keltic Nordid phenotype. The rest of Southern Germany is strongly Alpinid. Germany as a whole is not Nordid, rather North-West Cromagnid types such as the Borreby and Dalofaelid dominate especially in the very northern part. So South-West Germany might show similarities with Belgium and the Netherlands regarding the Nordid types. Nevertheless there are strong Borreby and Dalofaelid admixtures in South-West Germany too. Germany is not Nordid in the same way, Sweden or Norway (Hallstatt) or England (Keltic) is. It was the Ancient Franks who also strengthened the Nordid element in Belgium, in fact it was from Frankish language that Dutch and Flemish speech came from.

  2. #112
    Veteran Member Septentrion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 08:07 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    100% Northwest European and Flemish
    Ancestry
    From Flanders ( Koninkjrik België )
    Country
    Belgium
    Y-DNA
    R1a - L664
    mtDNA
    n/a
    Taxonomy
    60% Borreby with strong 40% Keltic Nordid admixture
    Age
    28
    Gender
    Posts
    11,264
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,188
    Given: 3

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rico33 View Post
    Also, less and less people take the classifications seriously. It is pseudo scientific and only good for 'intellectual' masturbation. Have fun with that.
    Putting Belgian population, north or south,with Scandinavians is a almost like calling someone black because of a great grand parent that was black.
    Stop irrational comparisons like that. Both Belgian and Scandinavian populations are of the northern branch of the European Caucasoid race. The Black and White comparison is foolishness and senseless! If your grand-parent was Black, then you might classify as a “quadroon” in some countries or just as “Black” in Anglo-Saxon countries (e.g. US or Canada). Another point do not confuse anthropology with genetics.

  3. #113
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Last Online
    01-01-2020 @ 01:32 PM
    Ethnicity
    Comming after guessing in 'taxonomy'
    Country
    Belgium
    Gender
    Posts
    1,328
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 365
    Given: 95

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Septentrion View Post
    Stop irrational comparisons like that. Both Belgian and Scandinavian populations are of the northern branch of the European Caucasoid race. The Black and White comparison is foolishness and senseless! If your grand-parent was Black, then you might classify as a “quadroon” in some countries or just as “Black” in Anglo-Saxon countries (e.g. US or Canada). Another point do not confuse anthropology with genetics.
    You recently saw the cluster picture that showed Belgians leaning towards the southern types, and plenty of locals have the looks for it. You are just a Nordicist and racist.

  4. #114
    Veteran Member Septentrion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 08:07 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    100% Northwest European and Flemish
    Ancestry
    From Flanders ( Koninkjrik België )
    Country
    Belgium
    Y-DNA
    R1a - L664
    mtDNA
    n/a
    Taxonomy
    60% Borreby with strong 40% Keltic Nordid admixture
    Age
    28
    Gender
    Posts
    11,264
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,188
    Given: 3

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rico33 View Post
    You recently saw the cluster picture that showed Belgians leaning towards the southern types, and plenty of locals have the looks for it. You are just a Nordicist and racist.
    I am not a Nordicist, let alone a racist. Far from it! I respect everyone no matter who they are. Nevertheless, I am truth teller and say things the way they are. I am not a hypocrite, that’s all. In the genetical picture, we can see Belgians as a whole are lying between Central Europeans ( French, French East, Germans, etc..,) and Northern Europeans ( English, Irish, Norwegians, etc...). It is a known fact that the Keltic Nordid subrace centered in the United Kingdom spills into the Low Countries especially Northern Belgium (Flanders) and the Netherlands. While the Alpinid transitions from France into the Borreby of the Low Countries. Other Keltic Nordid areas (Secondary zone) are in South-West Germany and Northern as well Western Switzerland.

  5. #115
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Last Online
    01-01-2020 @ 01:32 PM
    Ethnicity
    Comming after guessing in 'taxonomy'
    Country
    Belgium
    Gender
    Posts
    1,328
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 365
    Given: 95

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Septentrion View Post
    I am not a Nordicist, let alone a racist. Far from it! I respect everyone no matter who they are. Nevertheless, I am truth teller and say things the way they are. I am not a hypocrite, that’s all. In the genetical picture, we can see Belgians as a whole are lying between Central Europeans ( French, French East, Germans, etc..,) and Northern Europeans ( English, Irish, Norwegians, etc...). It is a known fact that the Keltic Nordid subrace centered in the United Kingdom spills into the Low Countries especially Northern Belgium (Flanders) and the Netherlands. While the Alpinid transitions from France into the Borreby of the Low Countries. Other Keltic Nordid areas (Secondary zone) are in South-West Germany and Northern as well Western Switzerland.
    It should be the other way around :
    The software called KN type spills into England. This region was populated before England. This is the problem with geographic names for the phenotypes that migrate.
    It is also the other way around for the Scandinavian people, who have more descendance from central Europe than we have from Scandinavians.

  6. #116
    Veteran Member Septentrion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 08:07 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    100% Northwest European and Flemish
    Ancestry
    From Flanders ( Koninkjrik België )
    Country
    Belgium
    Y-DNA
    R1a - L664
    mtDNA
    n/a
    Taxonomy
    60% Borreby with strong 40% Keltic Nordid admixture
    Age
    28
    Gender
    Posts
    11,264
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,188
    Given: 3

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rico33 View Post
    It should be the other way around :
    The software called KN type spills into England. This region was populated before England. This is the problem with geographic names for the phenotypes that migrate.
    It is also the other way around for the Scandinavian people, who have more descendance from central Europe than we have from Scandinavians.
    The KN is commonest in the British Isles, where it forms the principal racial element. Thus it could be called the center of the KN type.
    The HN is commonest in the Sweden and East Norway. This could called the center of the HN.

  7. #117
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Last Online
    01-01-2020 @ 01:32 PM
    Ethnicity
    Comming after guessing in 'taxonomy'
    Country
    Belgium
    Gender
    Posts
    1,328
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 365
    Given: 95

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Septentrion View Post
    The KN is commonest in the British Isles, where it forms the principal racial element. Thus it could be called the center of the KN type.
    The HN is commonest in the Sweden and East Norway. This could called the center of the HN.
    That is a pointless way of classification from a historical point of view. It is like calling Siberians 'Sinid'.

  8. #118
    Veteran Member Septentrion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 08:07 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    100% Northwest European and Flemish
    Ancestry
    From Flanders ( Koninkjrik België )
    Country
    Belgium
    Y-DNA
    R1a - L664
    mtDNA
    n/a
    Taxonomy
    60% Borreby with strong 40% Keltic Nordid admixture
    Age
    28
    Gender
    Posts
    11,264
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,188
    Given: 3

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rico33 View Post
    That is a pointless way of classification from a historical point of view. It is like calling Siberians 'Sinid'.
    Sinids are in China not Siberia.

  9. #119
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Last Online
    01-01-2020 @ 01:32 PM
    Ethnicity
    Comming after guessing in 'taxonomy'
    Country
    Belgium
    Gender
    Posts
    1,328
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 365
    Given: 95

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Septentrion View Post
    Sinids are in China not Siberia.
    No, really???

  10. #120
    Veteran Member Septentrion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 08:07 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    100% Northwest European and Flemish
    Ancestry
    From Flanders ( Koninkjrik België )
    Country
    Belgium
    Y-DNA
    R1a - L664
    mtDNA
    n/a
    Taxonomy
    60% Borreby with strong 40% Keltic Nordid admixture
    Age
    28
    Gender
    Posts
    11,264
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,188
    Given: 3

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    The KN most common hair color is not blond, it light or medium brown. The eyes are typically blue, but predominantly light-mixed.

Page 12 of 26 FirstFirst ... 2891011121314151622 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 12-28-2019, 01:18 AM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-08-2018, 09:03 PM
  3. help with diff between keltic nordic and norid
    By ricko0812 in forum Taxonomy
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-08-2018, 07:54 AM
  4. Noric VS Keltic Nordic
    By Norb in forum Taxonomy
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-15-2018, 04:21 PM
  5. Keltic nordic with black hair and light eyes?
    By lucm_019 in forum Anthropology
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 12-19-2016, 06:03 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •