0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,636 Given: 40 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 52,721 Given: 43,621 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,636 Given: 40 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,346 Given: 1,328 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 52,721 Given: 43,621 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,636 Given: 40 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,346 Given: 1,328 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,636 Given: 40 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 52,721 Given: 43,621 |
In before somebody mentions Porfirogenet and unbaptised Serbs
Prince Michael of Zahumlje, according to DAI, has origin from Vistula river in southern Poland, which is exact location of White Croatia
So, it seems this ''Serb'' Land was ruled by Croat Prince since sure as hell White Serbs did not live anywhere near Vistula river.
Hahahaha. That is why serious historians don't consider DAI as reliable source. It's full of different and conflicting information. And it was written centuries after actual events.
Regarding Bunjevci, only important thing is that linguisitically and ethnically they have no difference whatsoever to west Herzegovina Croats.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,636 Given: 40 |
According to your propaganda even Nemanjići were of Croatian origin.
Speeches are changing from generation to generation, my mother speak differen than my grandmother.
I have seen text on old rural speech of Bačka Bunjevci, there is tons of similar and same things as in speech of my grandma and great-grandma.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks