0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,704 Given: 5,603 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 26,236 Given: 43,779 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 837 Given: 258 |
southern europeans(universal)>MENAS(universal)>northern europeans(mainly in southern cone, southeast/southern Brazil and Sonora)>polynesians(Mexico, Central America and Great Colombia)>micronesians(Central America)>Siberians(Southern cone)>West Africans(Belize, atlantic coast of Central America and Colombia, Northeastern Brazil, Belize, Dominican Republic, Cuba, Puerto Rico)>Horn Africans(northeastern Brazil). The rest can´t past, barely cherrypicked individuals individuals.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,702 Given: 85 |
Those peoples are so different, I never saw someone like them. So I dont know, maybe they can pass in another side of Latam, maybe...
The first was europeans because they are anywhere in Latam from 10 to 80% mostly, but with regions where they are 95% or even 5%.
Southeast asians because many of them resemble mestizos from countries such as Mexico for example, but basically all countries too.
Arabs and North Africans because they look euro-pardos and maybe castizo sometimes in the case of levantines and anatolids.
Indids because many of them resemble pardos.
Blacks because they are around 5-7.5% of Latam people and can reach 0% to 60% in some regions like Bolivia and Choco Colombia respectively.
Last edited by Tenma de Pegasus; 11-25-2019 at 12:41 AM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,395 Given: 890 |
North Africa and Caucasus/Levant are over or at least on pair with Southeast Asia because most castizos resemble native from these regions, while definetively there are many southeast asians that can pass as people highly amerindian, most of them can not and resemble just southeast asians.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,704 Given: 5,603 |
Absolutely agreed. North Africa and MENA/Caucasus is definitely comes before/higher ranking in passing than Southeast Asia. I can also guaranteed most SE Asians like at least 60-70% or more would not pass in Latin America as they look too distinguishable and ethnic similar to what you have suggested.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,704 Given: 5,603 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,704 Given: 5,603 |
Bump
Thumbs Up |
Received: 14,828 Given: 13,088 |
Those passing (in no particular order):
Southern Europeans, West Asians, North Africans, South Asians, South East Asians, Central Asians, Siberids, Polynesians, Melanesians, Micronesians, Australoids, Various Indigenous/Paleo/Archaic Ethnoses in South East Asia/Pacific.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,704 Given: 5,603 |
Appreciated your great input!
I would put Melanesians in between Micronesians and Australoids or after Australoids though. (Actually Melanesians are Australoids)
Also I would put split South Asians into Northwest South Asians, Southern Indians, Veddoids and Mundas. To me, NW South Asians might come before or one rank after SE Asians.
Whereas, I would include South Indians, Veddoids and Mundas after Micronesians but before Australoids/Melanesians.
Also where in your criteria would you insert Horn Africans, Khoisan and Pygmies into your rankings?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks