1
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,703 Given: 5,603 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,703 Given: 5,603 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,703 Given: 5,603 |
Edit. Nothing relevant.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,703 Given: 5,603 |
Definitely. These three to five groups would literally be unpassable in Latin America imo. Moreover, Veddoids and perhaps Mundas would be very alien in the region as well.
Me too. I am also contented with my interaction and conversing with you.
You are one of the most entertaining members here. You deserved a nomination for the prize of TA's most outstanding user.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,703 Given: 5,603 |
Sorry for late reply. But just noticed that you put Bantus into two categories? Some type of Bantus pass easier while other Bantus pass harder? Or is supposed to be West Africans for one of them?
Also where do Kavkazians/Caucasians for into this ranking?
I think Central Asians should also be separated into two categories: the ones who look more Caucasoid like Tajiks, Turkmens, a lot of Uzbeks would pass easier while those who are predominantly Mongoloid like Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Hazara, many Uzbek, Afghan Turkmen would be somewhere between East Asians and Siberians.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,703 Given: 5,603 |
Yep most SE Asians don't really pass or they would be mistaken as some type of Chinese, Japanese, etc.
Its interesting how people put Siberians among the last. Its freaking paradoxical because Siberians are genetically the closest to Amerindians but look so distinct as day and night.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,064 Given: 1,589 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks