0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,992 Given: 432 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 52,721 Given: 43,621 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,158 Given: 4,510 |
Those are clearly Iranicized local Dacians. The ones who look Germanic/Norwegian are of Bastarnae or east-Germanic extraction. That area was a melting pot during that time yet tribes kept to themselves. Except the Scirii who were mixed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scirii
Thumbs Up |
Received: 52,721 Given: 43,621 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 11,836 Given: 7,303 |
[/QUOTE]
I agree about Scythian_Moldova but not for Dacians, Thracians. Balkan Turks and Thracian Bulgarians get them in the single population even closer than any other modern population.
For Dienekes:
Before Thracians arrive, the native population was farmers. If these samples are close to the Sardinians, then we have three different option:
-Thracians couldn't make mass effect on genetics, their population was not more than the natives.
-Person an outlier
-Person have nothing to do with Thracians
Also, the isolation of Sardinians towards modern day Europeans and any other groups shows that this archaic feature is no longer shared by any modern groups and Sardinians remain closest to Neolithic Europeans. This may be the reason why they associated with Sardinians.
Only on the assumption that Cardial Pottery in their Mediterranean migrations to the west mixed with "European Hunter Gatherers" almost exactly the same way as LBK in Stuttgart. However, evidence of Loschbour- (or Brana 1-) like HG in the Balkan is still missing, and Bulgarian K8 rather correlates with a Russian intrusion - not so strange given the northern cultural links of Thracians.
Since both assumptions seem to be wrong and unsupported by the Sardinian evidence, I gather the EEF component should be considered indigenous in southern Europe.
The ADMIXTURE analysis is particularly interesting. Of course I'm very keen to know how West Asian and how North European these Iron Age Bulgarians were. But because of the limited data set of modern populations used, a component that's clearly similar to the Dodecad K7b or Globe13 or MDLP World-22 West Asian component shows up only at K=8, it's the pink component which makes up one half of the Adygei and the entirety of some Druze individuals.
So the early Iron Age Bulgarian is about as West Asian as the modern French are, and just a little more than Ötzi. On the whole he resembles Gok4; he has just a little more of the Palestinian, Druze and Mozabite components, and a little less of the Sardinian component, what's natural, since he was closer to the entry point of the non-European early farmers.
The late Iron Age Bulgarian has only very slight West Asian admixture. And interestingly, up to K=4, he's very similar to the hunter-gatherers, he seems to have only a little bit of early farmer admixture. (At K=5 and more he also has a lot of the Sardinian components etc, but the same holds true for the hunter-gatherers, so that's because of the hunter-gatherer ancestry in Sardinians etc, and not the other way round.)
These results, if valid, are very interesting, also regarding the question of IE origins, and they give me food for thought. Isn't it striking that hunter-gatherer-like individuals were roaming around in the late Iron Age and that this individual belonged to the upper class?
I would also like to point out that these individuals were not necessarily both Thracians. Not all of the ancient tribes known from the Thracian region were definitely Thracians, partly they may even have been non-IE and related with the pre-Greek Lemnians.
qpAdm: Bulgarian_1.DG= 77 - Kimak.SG= 23, p= 0.36, se= 0.31.
Y: Q-L330 > Q-YP771 > Q-BZ180 > Q-F16045* (F15008*) --> Baikal N, Altai MLBA, Aldy-Bel, Pazyryk, Hun.
MT: K1a --> Iron Gates, Starcevo, Bulgaria N, Bulgaria CA, Bulgaria BA.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 11,836 Given: 7,303 |
qpAdm: Bulgarian_1.DG= 77 - Kimak.SG= 23, p= 0.36, se= 0.31.
Y: Q-L330 > Q-YP771 > Q-BZ180 > Q-F16045* (F15008*) --> Baikal N, Altai MLBA, Aldy-Bel, Pazyryk, Hun.
MT: K1a --> Iron Gates, Starcevo, Bulgaria N, Bulgaria CA, Bulgaria BA.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,158 Given: 4,510 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,992 Given: 432 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,158 Given: 4,510 |
You don't understand that the people who identified as Thracian of course were not 100% Yamnaya-like genetically. All Balkan "Indo-Europeans" were indo-europeanized linguistically and not too muc genetically. It's only Corded-Ware culture who got near-complete replaced by Yamnya, not the Balkans. The Balkans was too densely populated with Starcevo, Vinca and Cucuteni people who had a food surplus from farming.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks