Central Mexico vs Ecuador

[Erronkari]

Are you sure? Most genetic studies place Ecuador around 40% european, close to southern Mexico. The only thing that I don´t believe is Ecuador´s SSA since in most of those they are under 10% SSA on average and watching lots of videos of Ecuador several of them (at least 2/10 people) have a zamboid(big lips, wide nose, very long space between nose´s nostrils, short and fat) look, similar to nicaraguans/hondurans.

The only area which is black strongly influenced is in the north pacific coast...
In the rest of the coast some individuals have some influence but it's not big, and in general inner the country in the highlands, that influence is close to 0.
I am almost sure that Nicaragua and Honduras have far more SSA influence than Ecuador, because it's something general.
Even in Estelí and Matagalpa (at least what I've seen), although you can find a part of the population which is more euro influenced, a bunch of other people show many ambiguous traits, which include some african residual.

[perikolez]

Are you sure? Most genetic studies place Ecuador around 40% european, close to southern Mexico. The only thing that I don´t believe is Ecuador´s SSA since in most of those they are under 10% SSA on average and watching lots of videos of Ecuador several of them (at least 2/10 people) have a zamboid(big lips, wide nose, very long space between nose´s nostrils, short and fat) look, similar to nicaraguans/hondurans.

Southern Mexico and Ecuador are in the same level of european contribution. Ecuador has two main regions. Sierra which mostly indigenou and indomestizos, and Costa where you can find more european and black contribution, but indomestizos or indotrirraciales follow being majority. You can find a godd amount of mulatos, zambos and some blacks in Costal region, but they are only majority in Esmeraldas province. You only find people with predominatly european mixture in high clases. Most european people you can find in the streets of Ecuador are mestizos (50%-60% european).

[Zuh]

Bump

[TheWolf97]

Southern Mexico and Ecuador are in the same level of european contribution. Ecuador has two main regions. Sierra which mostly indigenou and indomestizos, and Costa where you can find more european and black contribution, but indomestizos or indotrirraciales follow being majority. You can find a godd amount of mulatos, zambos and some blacks in Costal region, but they are only majority in Esmeraldas province. You only find people with predominatly european mixture in high clases. Most european people you can find in the streets of Ecuador are mestizos (50%-60% european).

Me consta lo que acabas de decir Totalmente de acuerdo

[axel.aleman]

The only area which is black strongly influenced is in the north pacific coast...
In the rest of the coast some individuals have some influence but it's not big, and in general inner the country in the highlands, that influence is close to 0.
I am almost sure that Nicaragua and Honduras have far more SSA influence than Ecuador, because it's something general.
Even in Estelí and Matagalpa (at least what I've seen), although you can find a part of the population which is more euro influenced, a bunch of other people show many ambiguous traits, which include some african residual.

En realidad los ecuatorianos de la costa me recuerdan a muchos de mis paisanos, a nicas y hondureños.

[Gauthier]

Yo creo que Ecuador en general, fenotipicamente hablando, es mas Euro que Peru. Por ende creo que si son similares a la poblacion del centro de MX.

[Paraguayo HFD]

Yo creo que si se toma como centro de México a estos estados, no son tan distintos en el aporte euro pero si se toma a los otros estados del occidente de México, hay una notable diferencia.