0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,471 Given: 1,541 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,636 Given: 40 |
Slovenija ob Japonski in Antarktiki med tremi najbolj 'vročimi destinacijami'
https://www.24ur.com/novice/gospodar...inacijami.html
Po Lendavi, Mariboru, Ljubljani, Škofji Loki in Kopru so šesti Sabor hrvaške kulture letos pripravili v Velenju. Gostilo ga je tamkajšnje KD Međimurje, nastopilo je 200 članov iz osmih društev.
https://www.rtvslo.si/lokalne-novice...-hrvati/423381
Thumbs Up |
Received: 52,721 Given: 43,621 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,924 Given: 7,446 |
Ilmen Slavs probably had their own tribal name. They were from the early Middle Ages so information on them may have either gotten lost or wasn't recorded. Precise data from that time period is harder to come by. They would've likely identified with both their tribal name as well as with the generic Slav term. Its just that in their case the tribal name wasn't recorded or got lost similar to the case with the Nitra Slavs of Slovakia.
Based on what I've read online, it seems that Slovincians were simply Lutheran Kashubs. Kashubs probably identified as Kashub first and Slovincian second. When a part of them converted to Lutheranism, they would've probably became more estranged from the Kashub identity and then started identifying with the generic Slavic (Slovincian) label.
There are no clear linguistic features that divide the two, they're both part of the same dialect continuum.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,604 Given: 48,334 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 381 Given: 655 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 381 Given: 655 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks