Serbs, Romanians, Bulgarians, Mkd = 3rd century Romans in 7 minutes

[vbnetkhio]

Dacian and Moesian (Bulgarian) Territory wasnt Greek+Sardinian.

not literally of course , 70% greek + 30% sardinian means they were 30% more neolithic than modern greeks

[Voskos]

Vlachs are dacothracians raped by Slavic invasions. South Slavs are ethnically distinct from them.

[WeirdLookingFellow]

not literally of course , 70% greek + 30% sardinian means they were 30% more neolithic than modern greeks

How old was BGR_IA again? Would be better to have more samples, I don't think we could tell by one guy that this is how the pop in the area was at a uniform level.

Also STR_300, the SE European woman found in Bavaria between NW European samples, was very similar to modern day Tuscans. The sample is believed to be from around 500AD and presented an elongated skull, a cultural mark of Neolithic SE Europe.

Ofc, Romanians and Bulgarians are not Tuscan, as visible from my signature, but we would need some sort of intermediary sample between BGR_IA and STR_300 to understand how quickly SE Europeans turned from very EEF to moderately EEF.

Would that be HRV_IA?

[vbnetkhio]

How old was BGR_IA again? Would be better to have more samples, I don't think we could tell by one guy that this is how the pop in the area was at a uniform level.

500-400 BCE. i think it's safe to asume that a alrge part of the Balkans were like that, look aat this model for Albanians:

"68.5 % BGR_IA + 31.5 % HUN_Avar_Szolad_Av2" "0.0101"

[Vožd]

Not just Vlachs, but Slav/Vlach mix (more or less, depends of country/region).

[Bosniensis]

Not just Vlachs, but Slav/Vlach mix (more or less, depends of country/region).

Zyraxes was a Getae king who ruled the northern part of what is today Dobrogea in the 1st century BC. He was mentioned in relation with the campaigns of Marcus Licinius Crassus (grandson of the triumvir). His capital, Genucla, was besieged by the Romans in 28 BC, but he managed to escape and flee to his Scythian allies.

Zyraxes
King of Dacia
Died cca. 28 BC.

Earlier, Antonius Hybrida, the governor of Moesia, was defeated beneath the walls of Histria in 61 BC. The Getae under Zyraxes and the bastarnae of Scythia were allied with the Histrians, but it seems that the main victors of this conflict were the Getae, as they were the keepers of the battle trophies and brought them back to Genucla, Zyraxes' capital.

NOW:

Now let's assume that Getae are "Vlachs" and Scythians "Slavs" which is probably correct, because Romans called Russians "Rus of Scythian origin"
that means that even in ~50 B.C. people of balkan (at least) had contacts, relations, mixing with those people, and while in most earliest periods
people of balkan were "without scythian slavic influence" in 50 B.C. at least they started mixing, so that Slavic admixture isn't something that happened
over night, but rather over many hundreds of years.