1
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,589 Given: 462 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,608 Given: 1,825 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,608 Given: 1,825 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,589 Given: 462 |
That was my original statement, as far as I know. On the MDLP K27 spreadsheet, they seem to be fairly close to North Russians. But yeah, turn it around and North Russians become Mordovians who speak Russian. Does that sound better?
Russian North-Russian Estonian Finland Finn South_Finn North_Finn Mordovian
North-European Baltic 66,10 51,47 60,98 24,63 28,73 26,66 10,72 55,75
Baltic-Finnic 5,76 14,38 17,15 58,08 52,64 54,38 79,77 6,16
Uralic 1,48 9,04 1,19 2,21 1,75 2,27 0,54 7,04
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,095 Given: 10,128 |
That's a strange North-Russian, here is my grandmother:
0.00% Nilotic-Omotic
1.25% Ancestral-South-Ind.
47.21% North-European-Balt.
3.76% Uralic
0.35% Australo-Melanesian
0.91% East-Siberian
0.39% Ancestral-Yayoi
6.43% Caucasian-Near-East.
0.00% Tibeto-Burman
0.16% Austronesian
0.01% Central-African-Pygm
0.00% Central-African-HG
0.00% Nilo-Saharian
0.52% North-African
3.43% Gedrosia-Caucasian
1.29% Cushitic
0.32% Congo-Pygmean
0.00% Bushmen
0.45% South-Meso-Amerind.
8.97% South-West-European
0.00% North-Amerindian
0.01% Arabic
0.81% North-Circumpolar
1.70% Kalash
0.00% Papuan-Australian
22.02% Baltic-Finnic
0.00% Bantu
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,608 Given: 1,825 |
Yes in that run Mordovians do indeed get very little of that Finnish component, which in my view, after careful examination of several different types of methods of ancestry estimation, does reflect some sort of racial reality. In other words it does not seem likely that the majority North European ancestry in Mordovians is closely related to Finnish type of North European ancestry.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,437 Given: 1,436 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,437 Given: 1,436 |
I neither need to do it, because I don't know who are Tarandians. I know an Iron Age burial custom named Tarand graves though (In Estonia, Finland and Sweden. The fact is that BOO samples are ancestral for all Baltic N1c1. Samples from Tarand graves hold only downstream mutation of BOO samples. I can wait until Volga Kama genes are connected to Estonians and before that I need to say really nothing.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,840 Given: 2,076 |
In Jeong et al. 2019 (The genetic history of admixture across inner Eurasia), the Mongoloid ancestry of Tatars (other than Zabolotniye Tatars, who are Tatarified Khanty/Mansi/Nenets) was modeled as Ulchi (Tungusic), but Mordvins and other Uralics were modeled as Nganasan.
For the forest-tundra population to the west of the Urals, Nganasan + Srubnaya + WHG + LBK_EN and its submodel provide a good fit, while additional ANE-related contribution (AG3) is required for those to the east of the Urals (Enets, Selkups, Kets and Mansi). For the steppe-forest populations, Srubnaya + Ulchi, Srubnaya + Ulchi + AG3 and Srubnaya + Nganasan provide a good fit. For each target population, we present the simplest best fitting model, that is, the one with the smallest number of references and with the biggest P value. The 5 cM jackknifing standard errors are marked by horizontal bars. Details of the model information are presented in Supplementary Tables 5 and 8. *P = 0.01–0.05; **P < 0.01.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,437 Given: 1,436 |
Mordvas have only 15% N1 and 36% R1a and 11% R1b, North Russians are very similar. These numbers are based on academic samples. Karelian, Vepsian and Ingrian ancestries are common in Northwest Russia, from St Petersnurg to Lake Onega, but North Russian academic samples are near Vologda and from other areas where people have not spoken Finnic language during known history.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks