More Caucasoid: North Africans or Pakistanis

[Adamastor]

North Africans, most Pakistanis are on the 25% Australoid range and North Africans have 20% SSA, but a good portion of this SSA is Taforalt, a pre-black African admixture shared with SSAs that was read as SSA by GEDmatch calculators. The least SSA admixed North Africans actually have around 6%-13% Negroid admixture, not much different from Finns and Russians regarding Mongoloids.

North Africans are generally Caucasoids, Pakistanis and North Indians are borderline Caucasoids imo. 25% is too much to be considered just ''Caucasoid'' even if it's a pseudo-scientific term applied more to somatic features than to DNA.

[Adamastor]

Double.

[Nassbean]

North Africans, most Pakistanis are on the 25% Australoid range and North Africans have 20% SSA, but a good portion of this SSA is Taforalt, a pre-black African admixture shared with SSAs that was read as SSA by GEDmatch calculators. The least SSA admixed North Africans actually have around 6%-13% Negroid admixture, not much different from Finns and Russians regarding Mongoloids.

North Africans are generally Caucasoids, Pakistanis and North Indians are borderline Caucasoids imo. 25% is too much to be considered just ''Caucasoid'' even if it's a pseudo-scientific term applied more to somatic features than to DNA.

I totally agree with you on this but I just posted plenty of samples and most of them have less than 6% ssa

[lameduck]

North Africans, most Pakistanis are on the 25% Australoid range and North Africans have 20% SSA, but a good portion of this SSA is Taforalt, a pre-black African admixture shared with SSAs that was read as SSA by GEDmatch calculators. The least SSA admixed North Africans actually have around 6%-13% Negroid admixture, not much different from Finns and Russians regarding Mongoloids.

North Africans are generally Caucasoids, Pakistanis and North Indians are borderline Caucasoids imo. 25% is too much to be considered just ''Caucasoid'' even if it's a pseudo-scientific term applied more to somatic features than to DNA.

Also lighter pakis look lighter pakis , but Lighter NAs can look europeans.
Personally I dont care about this stuff , its useless labels.

[Adamastor]

I totally agree with you on this but I just posted plenty of samples and most of them have less than 6% ssa

Yeah, but there are North Africans without recent ancestry from Black African slaves reaching as much as 13-14% ''true'' SSA. But it's not a big deal, there's a range, a natural variation, from 5% to 15%, the same as Russians can be as little as 2-3% Mongoloid and as much as 15%.

People in anthroforums act like if 5-10% variation is a lot but that's inside statistical variation.

[Adamastor]

Remember that Ancient Egyptians were called ''pure Caucasoids'' here when in reality they were in between 5-15% SSA.

[Numidia]

Yeah, but there are North Africans without recent ancestry from Black African slaves reaching as much as 13-14% ''true'' SSA. But it's not a big deal, there's a range, a natural variation, from 5% to 15%, the same as Russians can be as little as 2-3% Mongoloid and as much as 15%.

People in anthroforums act like if 5-10% variation is a lot but that's inside statistical variation.

I have 0% ssa

[Adamm]

I have 0% ssa

On commercial autosomal tests, which doesn't cover everything. You would get SSA on G25 and on GEDmatch.

[Abdelnour]

Remember that Ancient Egyptians were called ''pure Caucasoids'' here when in reality they were in between 5-15% SSA.

They have the same SSA as Copts do today.

[Numidia]

On commercial autosomal tests, which doesn't cover everything. You would get SSA on G25 and on GEDmatch.

On gedmatch I didn't have ssa only a little northeast african which is probably related to east africans
23andme use northern maghrebis for their samples