John Paul II's Blasphemy

[Teutone]

[Loki]

Wow, he's not a Christian at all.. an antichrist, a child of the devil. And the Vatican canonised him..shows you their decadence and distance from the truth of God.

[Kamal900]

Um, who cares?

[Loki]

Um, who cares?

People who still follow him or revere him should care.

[The Lawspeaker]

For as far as I concerned, the Church pretty much seized to function after VAT II. Call me a heretic there, the words, actions and ordinances of the Church post 1965 have no more meaning to me than a dead dog.

[Loki]

For as far as I concerned, the Church pretty much seized to function after VAT II.

The fact of the matter is that they were corrupt and ungodly even long before VAT II. Many Dutch and Germans and French realised this in the 16th century already.

[The Lawspeaker]

The fact of the matter is that they were corrupt and ungodly even long before VAT II.

That's what the Prots like to say. For me, Trente solved the issues which caused the Schism of 1517.

[Dna8]

Wow, he's not a Christian at all.. an antichrist, a child of the devil. And the Vatican canonised him..shows you their decadence and distance from the truth of God.

Have you ever read any compilation of the Sayings of the Desert Fathers?

It is the next book which I wish to read (I just have to find a physical copy somewhere (I don't want an electronic copy of this particular subject matter)).

Their mode and period of Christianity is the one that I find most moving.

[The Lawspeaker]

That's what the Prots like to say. For me, Trente solved the issues which caused the Schism of 1517.

Because it refused to update.

[Loki]

Have you ever read any compilation of the Sayings of the Desert Fathers?

It is the next book which I wish to read (I just have to find a physical copy somewhere (I don't want an electronic copy of this particular subject matter)).

Their mode and period of Christianity is the one that I find most moving.

No, I haven't, although I've heard bits of it. It is interesting, yes.