The Will to Power

[Batavia]

The will to power is a prominent concept in the philosophy of Nietzsche. Nietzsche contemplated writing a book entitled “The Will to Power” but never published a book under this name.
The will to power is neither good or bad; its a basic drive in everyone. The philosopher direct his will to power in the search for truth; the artist to create. At times Nietzsche seems to posit the will to power as more than just a principle that yields insight into the deep psychological motivations of human beings. In the Zarathustra he wrote: “Wherever I found a living thing, I found there the will to power.” This idea sounds a little rough to me, but I think its true.

[JamesBond007]

An inferior philosophy as humans are not fit to rule only people who have non-human anunnaki Elven Draco Sentien blood as Dragon kings are fit to rule. Arthur Schopenhauer said that in true geniuses the intellect dominates over the will and that most people have an unqualified will to live. Dragon's practice vampirism with their red-headed virgin grail maidens and therefore reach a transcendental union with the godhead which gives clear vision-- Derkesthai, a practice rooted in Scythian shamanic culture.

This is confirmed in the word genius, meaning inborn intellect or inspiration. Closely related to this word is genie, meaning a spirit, as in genius loci—“a spirit of place”. In Arabic the jinni is a spirit of fire or inspiration. The Latin genius, in Greek, is a daemon or inspiring intelligence and the root Latin gens signifies birth, origin and especially blood. The daemon or genius of the Dragons was inherited through the blood. Witches are born. Not made by silly play-acting initiation rituals.

A seer in Gaelic was called a Merlin and in the tripartite Aryan-Scythian caste system which overlaid that of their clients, the deeply religious Celts, the Merlin was a Druid Prince. Either side of the Druidic caste were the castes of the warrior aristocrats and the craftsmen and, although they all tended to behave as equals in this king-tribe system, the Druids were senior in rank.

Each caste attended to their allotted tasks. The study, teaching and practice of shamanism and magic were strictly the province of the Druids and Druidesses, forming part of a vast storehouse of knowledge and experience in the crafts and sciences, and in statesmanship and lore.

Presently we have a situation where the Elven Race, at the bottom of the pile, have become the untouchables, whilst the increasingly and frighteningly acquisitive Peasants and the Merchants are at the top, having wrested their positions from the block-headed Warriors. The end product of this fiasco over the last millennium and a half can be smelled in the air, tasted in the water supply and seen in the eyes of diseased, starving, third world children.

Homo Sapiens?

From the OED (Oxford English Dictionary, used often as a reference in this work), we learn that the prefix homo has two meanings. There is the Latin meaning (from whence comes “man”), and the Greek meaning, as in homo-genous, which means “common”, “the same” or “the same as”, “average”, “mediocre”.

The word sapiens is itself derived from the Latin word “sapienta” meaning understanding. However it was also a word which was used in a solely pejorative and derogatory context—from as far back as the Middle English period—explicitly in the sense of artful, deceitful, contrived or would-be wisdom; meaning sophistry or low cunning and hypocrisy. From sapienta we derive the slang derogative sap, which has been used throughout the Englishspeaking world to taunt idiots and fools.

Hereto, jocularly, in contemporary currency the phrase homo sapiens could, therefore, define a common, undistinguished hominid species. Its members would act in the same manner and think the same self-deluding thoughts, relating to each other through a veil of deception, within a limited field of conscious responses and conditioned reflexes, rather like sheep.

Taken in relation to what man has done to the planet and to his fellow creatures, the author doesn't think that this is an unwarranted or unsubstantiated attack, but a justifiable observation. Man aptly named himself: homo = mediocre + sapiens = cunning.

Therefore man could be defined by the Oxford English Dictionary, the recognised authority on, and arbiter of the English language, as being uniquely, thoroughly stupid and dim-witted, and his species description has incorporated within it a clear indication that this condition is genetically inherited. Nurture seems unable to ameliorate what nature has here ordained.

Here the idealist might argue that a eugenic solution, mediated through genetic engineering could produce a more passive, thoughtful population by weeding out the stupid gene and replacing it with something that would make us all less wasteful, aggressive and acquisitive.

Take a look around you, who runs the planet? That's right—the multinational corporations. And what is their raison d'etre? To force people to produce rubbish for the same people to buy. Where does the funding come from for scientific research grants? From the multi-national corporations or via governments who are subservient to, because they are paid for by, those same corporations. Would either support any form of research that would make people refuse to fight their wars for them or consume less of their pointless rubbish? No.

At present, genetic engineering for the most part is becoming yet another manifestation of human megalomania within a world socio-economic system that owes its very existence to the continued cultivation and promotion by the corporate elites, of mass psychosis on an international scale. This is a sad indictment upon the entire human race. The evidence speaks for itself and after several millennia of wars and destruction, culminating in the present series of social and ecological disasters, it doesn't seem that homo sapiens will ever be anything other than what they are. Furthermore, this is a profitable, and therefore a protected and encouraged, irremediable and irreversible, genetic condition.

In contrast the Dragons or Draco Sentiens, according to the most ancient definitions, were, once upon a time, long ago, genetically “clear sighted” members of the elder race, the “race of the wise”. It therefore follows in conclusion that, because of the neurophysiological, and consequently the cognitive and psychological differences between the two, neither was of the same species as the other, and the ancient Sumerian texts would uphold this view without question.