ATATÜRK SLANDERED AS DEVIL! 3million "FAITHFULSERVANT" YouTube Channel Arabic Propaganda

[Turul Karom]

The large YouTube network of Muslim scholars, with their reach of 3 million subscribers, have some rather "interesting" ideas about the fall of Turkey and what it would take to restore it. But do they speak about the continued marginalization of the ethnic Turkish, or the assaults against the ideals of Atatürk?

No.

In fact, apparently it was the cruel, devilish Atatürk who brought Turkey to ruin! Arab centric Islamists seethe that Kemalism places the Turkish people first who have an identity BEFORE the time of Islam and dare to not embrace Arabization. They unironically use the term "crypto-jew" to refer to Atatürk, after dancing around it for 5 minutes.

The same network says the Koran predicts the rise of the Atrak, or the Turkish. Doesn't the Koran say you are not superior all because you're Arab? According to the faithful servant channel, the Koran says, the Prophet himself told his followers to leave the Turkish alone or that the Arabs will lose. I'm also aware the Koran says very clearly you don't need to speak in Arabic to go to paradise/heaven or to read the book.

The hypocrisy is real.

I'm VERY certain that the Islam talks about kissing the black stone in the Kabbah is not a requirement as it is meaningless stone, but in Mecca men break the toes of one another to the point that their digits fall off trying to fight their way to kiss the black stone with their tongues.

Why the deception and posturing? Because of the baked-in anti-Turkish, Arab focus that creeps its way in through the extremism and dissolving of the ethnic Turkish identity.

Hungarians too suffered for this, when we came into Europe. Once we had the same steppe faith, but many things more changed than what was only listed in the Bible. The Catholic church made Hungary adopt the Latin alphabet, which has too few letters for our language (which is why we have "single letters" in Hungarian like sz, cs, gy, and so on..) but was needed for the Bible. Heaven forbid it would be written in our own Turkic alphabet! We were not allowed to live in yurts or shave our heads, but a papal bull was issued that said we must live on the ground in houses and grow our hair out. We could not play the duda pipes, we could not carry ancestral totems from our times on the steppes, we even had to change our names. Even now Hungarians commonly have two "first" names, even if not baptized, because of the tradition of attempting to keep our legacy Turkic names. Where in any holy book are these demanded to achieve their brand of salvation?

Why does this happen to us?

Because it is an attempt to change us from who we are.

Everyone can have their own personal faith. But it is important to remain ever vigilant for entryists who seek to undermine via religion (or any other means) from our ethnic and cultural identity. We want to keep our family close, and in good heart look out for one another's liberty.

Fortune bless Atatürk and his ideals.

[Kamal900]

How is it Arabic again? Are you seriously thinking that Muslims = Arab by any chance? I'm an Arab myself and I do respect Ataturk's achievements and etc for his people. If anything really it's mostly done by the 7anabaly Sunni Muslims of Pakistan and Arabia where Da3esh and Al-Qaeda belonged to rather than the 7anafi school of though like most Turks and other Arabs belong to. Don't destroy the peace here, please. We got rid of petros and other trolls here that made the forum very toxic.

[Turul Karom]

How is it Arabic again? Are you seriously thinking that Muslims = Arab by any chance? I'm an Arab myself and I do respect Ataturk's achievements and etc for his people. If anything really it's mostly done by the 7anabaly Sunni Muslims of Pakistan and Arabia where Da3esh and Al-Qaeda belonged to rather than the 7anafi school of though like most Turks and other Arabs belong to. Don't destroy the peace here, please. We got rid of petros and other trolls here that made the forum very toxic.

I have no problems with Arabs or with you. Of course Islam is not a race. You need to watch the channel and look up the presenter and their app. They don't like Atatürk or what he has done for Turkey or the Turkish people. They even call him a crypto-jew conspiring to use Turkey. There's a lot of context here you might be missing. Their logic is all around the de-Arabization of Islamic practice in Turkey regardless of it is against the Koran or not and seek to rope Turkey into the idea that Atatürk was not even really a "Turk". Look at the title card for the video even. If you don't think that's propagandistic then I don't know what you would. One of the (many) specific gripes the channel has is that they read in Turkish and also speak too much Turkish. So what will "fix" this? Speaking in Arabic. The "false messiah" dares to orient his nation culturally Turkic and suddenly he is labeled by Arab Islamists as not even Turkic himself.

[catgeorge]

Kissed Jew-Bolshevik ass to save them from Greeks and never had offspring is fairly degenerate to me. Below scumbag actually. One of the reasons why Istanbul is the transexual capital of the world.

The man was a fag

[Turul Karom]

Weak bait.

[itilvolga]

Kissed Jew-Bolshevik ass to save them from Greeks and never had offspring is fairly degenerate to me. Below scumbag actually. One of the reasons why Istanbul is the transexual capital of the world.

The man was a fag

How dare you say that when your ancestors are known with their Russian back? Don’t you know that your ancestors tried their chance to be free in the god damn Romania only for getting help from Russians faster and easier and Ottoman Army can reach there later? It’s clear enough who saved whose ass. It’s so damn funny how you think Bolsheviks would save his ass from Greeks lol even your own historian Dimitri Kitsikis says there was a Bolshevik-Greek (Atina) meeting in 1922 and the secretary of Greek Communist Party, Gianis Kordatos met those Bolsheviks to talk about Turkish-English relationship and how Bolsheviks wanna help to Greeks instead of Turks due to having common enemies. Just lol.

[Marmara]

This is why i hate and have no respect for Islamists.

Many who think the same like in the video move in Turkey, they will contribute in the future in the destruction of Ataturk's legacy and they will be the defender of new Islamic Sultanate of Anatolia.

[Hajimurad]

The large YouTube network of Muslim scholars, with their reach of 3 million subscribers, have some rather "interesting" ideas about the fall of Turkey and what it would take to restore it. But do they speak about the continued marginalization of the ethnic Turkish, or the assaults against the ideals of Atatürk?

No.

In fact, apparently it was the cruel, devilish Atatürk who brought Turkey to ruin! Arab centric Islamists seethe that Kemalism places the Turkish people first who have an identity BEFORE the time of Islam and dare to not embrace Arabization. They unironically use the term "crypto-jew" to refer to Atatürk, after dancing around it for 5 minutes.

The same network says the Koran predicts the rise of the Atrak, or the Turkish. Doesn't the Koran say you are not superior all because you're Arab? According to the faithful servant channel, the Koran says, the Prophet himself told his followers to leave the Turkish alone or that the Arabs will lose. I'm also aware the Koran says very clearly you don't need to speak in Arabic to go to paradise/heaven or to read the book.

The hypocrisy is real.

I'm VERY certain that the Islam talks about kissing the black stone in the Kabbah is not a requirement as it is meaningless stone, but in Mecca men break the toes of one another to the point that their digits fall off trying to fight their way to kiss the black stone with their tongues.

Why the deception and posturing? Because of the baked-in anti-Turkish, Arab focus that creeps its way in through the extremism and dissolving of the ethnic Turkish identity.

Hungarians too suffered for this, when we came into Europe. Once we had the same steppe faith, but many things more changed than what was only listed in the Bible. The Catholic church made Hungary adopt the Latin alphabet, which has too few letters for our language (which is why we have "single letters" in Hungarian like sz, cs, gy, and so on..) but was needed for the Bible. Heaven forbid it would be written in our own Turkic alphabet! We were not allowed to live in yurts or shave our heads, but a papal bull was issued that said we must live on the ground in houses and grow our hair out. We could not play the duda pipes, we could not carry ancestral totems from our times on the steppes, we even had to change our names. Even now Hungarians commonly have two "first" names, even if not baptized, because of the tradition of attempting to keep our legacy Turkic names. Where in any holy book are these demanded to achieve their brand of salvation?

Why does this happen to us?

Because it is an attempt to change us from who we are.

Everyone can have their own personal faith. But it is important to remain ever vigilant for entryists who seek to undermine via religion (or any other means) from our ethnic and cultural identity. We want to keep our family close, and in good heart look out for one another's liberty.

Fortune bless Atatürk and his ideals.

This video is a jihadist agenda. For jihadists Ataturk isn't different from their own dictators, who were considered as agents of European imperialism and traitors of Islam.
If Turks and Hungarians never adopted Islam and Christianity, they would be disappear off the face of the earth like Pannonian Avars, Huns of Attila or Khazars.
Modern Hungarians and modern Turks are very different people. While Turks preserved their core population (Turkmen-Yuruk tribes, augmented by Nogay and Crimean Tatar refugees), original Ugrian-Turkic population of Hungary suffered huge demographic losses from Mongol invasion, Ottoman jihad and Habsburg crusade. Majority of modern Hungarians descended from various Europeans, brought by Habsburg dynasty.
There are double irony: anti-Turkish Hungarian nationalists idealized Arrow-Cross party, which held Turanist ideology, but leader of this party was an ARMENIAN (Szalasi).

[Turul Karom]

This video is a jihadist agenda. For jihadists Ataturk isn't different from their own dictators, who were considered as agents of European imperialism and traitors of Islam.
If Turks and Hungarians never adopted Islam and Christianity, they would be disappear off the face of the earth like Pannonian Avars, Huns of Attila or Khazars.
Modern Hungarians and modern Turks are very different people. While Turks preserved their core population (Turkmen-Yuruk tribes, augmented by Nogay and Crimean Tatar refugees), original Ugrian-Turkic population of Hungary suffered huge demographic losses from Mongol invasion, Ottoman jihad and Habsburg crusade. Majority of modern Hungarians descended from various Europeans, brought by Habsburg dynasty.
There are double irony: anti-Turkish Hungarian nationalists idealized Arrow-Cross party, which held Turanist ideology, but leader of this party was an ARMENIAN (Szalasi).

Video shows the true face of what it means to become ethnically aware when previously under the spell of a internationalist, imperial agenda. Ottomanism killed Hungarians and Anatolian Turks, and who gets to carry the burden of this? The average Turkish man and woman who did not benefit from the occupations and fighting in general. Bodies bought time and blood bought only minutes. Atatürk saw this as a great death of Anatolian Turks and acted accordingly to root out issues. So successful he was that he even reversed losses to western Europeans after WW1. He would never be seen as a traitor by anyone who did not have an Arab-centric agenda, to as you say "jihadist".

Hungarian history is full of Turkic influx besides the original Hungarians. We took in the Pechenegs, who used to be rivals during western migration. We took in the Kabars after the dissolving of their empire. We took in waves of Kipchacks and Cumans, even after the Mongol invasion (the second of which was repelled with very few Magyar casualties by a united army under the Magyar-Cuman hero king László IV). Regardless, I match 1 Hun grave and 3 Hungarian conqueror graves. Even half Hungarian users here score higher Turkic results than neighbors, some higher than Anatolian Turks. (When using Kyrgyz and Uyghurs as reference points for Turkic). I don't understand what the final sentence is about because Hungarian nationalists come in a few flavors with Turanism being the largest. Arrow-Cross was a twisted puppet Hungarist party, not conventional Turanism. Szálasi wanted to sell out Hungarian sovereignty to the Germans who he thought would win WW2. Hungarian obedience would be his bargaining chip. Unlike Horthy who resisted Berlin as much as possible and attempted to be flexible by playing both sides, Szálasi agreed to all of Berlin's demands. He was the leader of a unpopular coup and puppet government, installed by the Nazi party with the help of the SS and the spy Otto Skorzeny so Hungary could be used as a meat shield for time to fortify Germany. No Turanist has him on their list of heroes.

[Hajimurad]

Video shows the true face of what it means to become ethnically aware when previously under the spell of a internationalist, imperial agenda. Ottomanism killed Hungarians and Anatolian Turks, and who gets to carry the burden of this? The average Turkish man and woman who did not benefit from the occupations and fighting in general. Bodies bought time and blood bought only minutes. Atatürk saw this as a great death of Anatolian Turks and acted accordingly to root out issues. So successful he was that he even reversed losses to western Europeans after WW1. He would never be seen as a traitor by anyone who did not have an Arab-centric agenda, to as you say "jihadist".

Hungarian history is full of Turkic influx besides the original Hungarians. We took in the Pechenegs, who used to be rivals during western migration. We took in the Kabars after the dissolving of their empire. We took in waves of Kipchacks and Cumans, even after the Mongol invasion (the second of which was repelled with very few Magyar casualties by a united army under the Magyar-Cuman hero king László IV). Regardless, I match 1 Hun grave and 3 Hungarian conqueror graves. Even half Hungarian users here score higher Turkic results than neighbors, some higher than Anatolian Turks. (When using Kyrgyz and Uyghurs as reference points for Turkic). I don't understand what the final sentence is about because Hungarian nationalists come in a few flavors with Turanism being the largest. Arrow-Cross was a twisted puppet Hungarist party, not conventional Turanism. Szálasi wanted to sell out Hungarian sovereignty to the Germans who he thought would win WW2. Hungarian obedience would be his bargaining chip. Unlike Horthy who resisted Berlin as much as possible and attempted to be flexible by playing both sides, Szálasi agreed to all of Berlin's demands. He was the leader of a unpopular coup and puppet government, installed by the Nazi party with the help of the SS and the spy Otto Skorzeny. No Turanist has him as their list of heroes.

Jihadists aren't Arab-centric. They also hate pre-Islamic history of their peoples. Just like radical Christians destroyed Pagan Greco-Roman statues, radical Muslims wage war against pre-Islamic heritage. Turkics, when adopted Islam, built great empires (Seljuk, Ottoman, Mogul), which impacted more than short-lived pagan khaganates.
Ethnic Ugro-Turkic population (descendants of Magyars, Khazars, Pecheneg and Cumans) remained only on Transylvania, Partium (Calvinists of Eastern Hungary), Slovakian-Hungarian border, Moldavia (Csangos) and Burgenland. Modern dominant Hungarian culture is an European as result of Catholicism and massive German-Slav immigration.
I speak not about Turanists but about modern Hungarian Nationalists from Jobbik. For them Germany is closer than Turkey.