Genetic analysis of male Hungarian Conquerors: European and Asian paternal lineages of the conquerin

[Dick]

goes into a lot of detail. They think the I2a-Din N found in the conquerors expanded from south east poland based off the Strs.

https://link.springer.com/article/10...20-019-00996-0

[PaleoEuropean]

goes into a lot of detail. They think the I2a-Din N found in the conquerors expanded from south east poland based off the Strs.

https://link.springer.com/article/10...20-019-00996-0

I think the first known I2a1b I-l161 came from Poland actually, remember reading it a few years back.

[PaleoEuropean]

Awesome article, they usually never dive this deep.

[PaleoEuropean]

The largest groups were N,G, I and R1a the rest were small minorities.

[PaleoEuropean]

Karos-Eperjesszög II, graves 16 (KEII/16) and 52 (KEII/52); Karos-Eperjesszög III, grave 11 (KEIII/11): I2a1-L621, CTS10228
The three samples were identical on those loci which were included in the network. One sample was different from the two others on DYS518, but that locus was not included in the network. Regardless of this single step distance, we can consider the three males close relatives. As the matrilineal lineages (mtDNA X2f) of the individuals from grave 52 in Karos II and grave 11 in Karos III are also identical (Neparáczki et al. 2018), they can be considered full siblings, and the grave goods discovered suggest that this genetic lineage belongs to the chief of the Karos-Eperjesszög settlements. The haplotype of the individual from grave 12 in Karos III (Neparáczki et al. 2017) is likewise identical to that of the 3 individuals we examined here, and 11 and was therefore also part of the chief’s family. The I2a1-L621 sample from grave 17 in Karos III (Neparáczki et al. 2017), however, was not a close genetic relative, because it differed on several markers.

[Dick]

I think the first known I2a1b I-l161 came from Poland actually, remember reading it a few years back.

They must of picked it up from somewhere in east Europe whilst they traveled west, they must've been chieftains or something if they joined them. They obviously weren't ethnic Magyars

[Dick]

The largest groups were N,G, I and R1a the rest were small minorities.

The one R1b is interesting

R1b-L23 (Z2105/2103) among the peoples of the Idel-Ural

and the G

Although the other two analyzed Hungarian Conqueror males (from Karos I grave 3 and Rakamaz grave 7) were not related, they both belonged to the G2a1-L293 subgroup, which is characteristic of the Ossetians from the Northern Caucasus.

[PaleoEuropean]

The one R1b is interesting



and the G

Seems like they were an epic patchwork of people, I wonder what their common interests were.

[Crimson Winds]

Seems like they were an epic patchwork of people, I wonder what their common interests were.

having a tough relation with Khazars.

[Dick]

Seems like they were an epic patchwork of people, I wonder what their common interests were.

Just another "Hell's Angels" gang on horseback like others from the Steppe