Are Amerindians and Indomestizos the most likely to be incels among Latinos?

[Synapsid]

Depends, Latin America is too heterogeneous. In the western/westernized urban middle classes indians, mestizos and indo-mestizos would have a lot of problems compared to whiter/more caucasoid looking individuals, but in the countryside of Peru, for example, inceldom is probably not a problem.

Really?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quanah_Parker

[kalach]

good point. he looks more like a hapa to me though and i thought hapas are rather undesirable.

It's an individual case. Some demographics are more likely to be attractive objectively, but every race has attractive people lighter than some certain skin color.

[Zanzibar]

bump

[El_Abominacion]

I’d assume that the more rural and ‘backwards’ parts of Latin America in particular do not have the issue of inceldom, which is a primarily first world problem. A very large part of inceldom stems from buying into the lie that behaving like a robot, having high inhibition, being a ‘nice guy’, especially if you’re below average in appearance is sexually attractive to most women. The more isolated countries in the world have not been deluded by the lies of feminism which aim to cripple the average man by removing masculinity.

Face, height, race and whatever else? Yeah they do have somewhat of an impact on your success. But far less so in third world societies. It’s primarily attitude that counts there, as it should be

[Carlito's Way]

Never heard of incel Latinos at all, ever
as I said before, Latinos of whatever background have swag and have a very different attitude
unlike South Asians, Arabs, whites, Asians and such, they are very timid, awkward, they dont know how to dress, they dont have swag, they are not smooth talkers etc

Amerindian features are not considered unattractive, not sure where you heard that from
that there are many ugly Amerindians or Amerindians who are not sexualize in the same way as blacks doesn't mean anything lol


Here is an example, the women (mexican in this case) picked morenos (brown guys) over gueros (light skin/whites)
why? Because for them, morenos/brown guys are more masculine looking




Women generally love the darker men of their country/continent
for example, dark black men are more wanted in the black community whereas light skin blacks are considered feminine and ugly by black women and that is because they view darker men more masculine and macho
in Europe, Southern Europeans had the Latin lover image and the tall dark and handsome which women in Europe would go crazy
In Latin America (at least in Mexico), brown guys are more viewed as masculine and macho, whereas the lighter ones more feminine and fragile

[Carlito's Way]

This case is like skin bleaching, you would think that Latin America would have high levels of people skin bleaching their skin like in India, Asia, Caribbean, African nations but the truth of the matter is that nope, it is super rare to find Latinos skin bleaching their skin color, despite the whole "Latinos praise light skin", skin bleaching and wanting to be lighter is just not a thing out there

same shit with this whole incel crap

[Trouble]

It depends on local phenotypes. Richard Ramirez had mostly amerindian ancestry and he could fuck women from every race.

Is that why he became a serial killer?

[Trouble]

This idea that Amerindians are looked down upon in Latin America is a myth. Mexicans and those in many other countries in the region see their compatriots as a "race" and are not aware of what mestizos, indomestizos, or triracials are. They go by skin color. So they do not perceive a difference between the darker ones and the lighter ones.

[kalach]

Is that why he became a serial killer?

Nope, it was mental. I read his teachers told he was lazy, but he had brains enough to be a nuclear scientist. He screwed his potential. If he lived these days, he would be a top tier model at this age with a neurotypical mind. This is why claiming amerindians can't slay sounds stupid.

[kratz]

No.

I'll tell you about Peru. First both prostitution is legal and male role models are a thing. For instance, my cousin lost his virginity to a prostitute then eventually got a girlfriend. Because prostitute was legal there was much more competition and it affected the dating pool. He also had male role models and was much more masculine than the average American. He got into fistfights, never played videos and played soccer.

Moreover, I'm curious if there are guys in Latin America who have easy access to sex would Americans consider them incels? For instance, I knew guys who went to brothels regularly(it was cheap to go to) and did not want an "emotional connection" or "validation from a woman". Those concepts seem to be strictly linked to protestanism+stigmatization and illegality of prostitution. I'm sure Americans would say, "That guy is a loser, he only bangs hookers." However, would that qualify as an incel? If there's a strict separation between sex and love. When sex is done for pleasure and relationships between people as based on beneficial arrangments.