Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 60

Thread: Origin of R1b in the Bashkir people?

  1. #11
    Senior Member Illyrius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2019
    Last Online
    11-04-2023 @ 10:51 PM
    Location
    Tirana
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Illyrised Gallo-Roman
    Ethnicity
    Proto-Albanian
    Ancestry
    Indo-Europeans and Neolithic Wogs
    Country
    Albania
    Y-DNA
    R1b-U152
    mtDNA
    H5a
    Taxonomy
    Ancient Roman + South Slavic or Hunnic Magyar
    Politics
    Anarchy
    Religion
    Prefer not to say.
    Relationship Status
    Prefer not to say
    Gender
    Posts
    666
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 301
    Given: 286

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Deniz View Post
    The dinosaurs were Indoeuropean.Imagine their father Q.
    Q isn't the father of R
    It's P
    Q and R are brothers
    Quote Originally Posted by Altaylı View Post
    you look more scythian sarmatian than mixed blondes(they mixed with I)

    you are true r1b
    Quote Originally Posted by Noff View Post
    I saw him. Looks like ancient Roman + South Slavic or Magyar
    Quote Originally Posted by Ford View Post
    Basal R and Q are too old to be directly associated with any linguistic group.

  2. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Last Online
    07-17-2021 @ 07:07 AM
    Ethnicity
    Finnish
    Country
    Finland
    Gender
    Posts
    1,679
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,840
    Given: 2,076

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Like Leto said, Bashkirs are European and not Central Asian.

    In Triska et al. 2017 (Between Lake Baikal and the Baltic Sea: genomic history of the gateway to Europe), Bashkirs had fairly high ancient IBD sharing with Khanty:



    The same paper suspected that the ancestors Bashkirs would have shifted their language during the Turkic expansion:

    Tatar share moderate amount of IBD (3.55–7.35 cM per pair) with all neighbouring populations, while Bashkir share most of their ancient blocks (on average 8.62 cM per pair) with Khanty, a group of Uralic speakers from Western Siberia. We speculate that this disparity between cultural and genetic affinities of Tatar and Bashkir can be attributed to a phenomenon of cultural dominance: the population ancestral to Bashkir adopted the Turkic language during Turkic expansion from the east (language replacement event).

    According to Post et al. 2019 (Y-chromosomal connection between Hungarians and geographically distant populations of the Ural Mountain region and West Siberia), Bashkirs share N3a4-B539 with Mansi and Khanty:

    Hg N3a4-B539 (Fig. 3c), on the other hand, is prevalent among Turkic speaking Bashkirs and also found in Tatars but is entirely missing from other populations of the Volga-Ural region such as Uralic speaking Udmurts, Maris, Komis and Mordvins, and in Northeast Europe, where instead N3a4-B535 lineages are frequent. Besides Bashkirs and Tatars in Volga-Ural region, N3a4-B539 is substantially represented in West Siberia among Ugric speaking Mansis and Khantys.

    There are Bashkirs who look very "Uralische":

    Spoiler!
    Last edited by Ymyyakhtakh; 01-28-2020 at 07:28 AM.

  3. #13
    Not even a member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Last Online
    Today @ 10:45 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Indo-European, Slavic
    Ethnicity
    Russian
    Country
    Brunei
    Region
    Russian Turkestan General Governorship
    Y-DNA
    R1a-YP270
    Religion
    Orthodox
    Gender
    Posts
    24,142
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 15,591
    Given: 8,909

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    I never said they were European. They aren't white by any means unless you consider half East Asian people white (which I don't).
    Just to clarify - there is nothing wrong with them, in fact their racial make up reflects their history and geographical location (transcontinental, at the crossroads of Eastern Europe and Central Asia/South Siberia).

  4. #14
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Kaspias's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Ankara
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Rumelian
    Ethnicity
    Balkan Turkish, Pomak
    Country
    Turkey
    Y-DNA
    Q-F16045
    mtDNA
    K1a
    Gender
    Posts
    7,446
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11,836
    Given: 7,303

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ymyyakhtakh View Post
    Like Leto said, Bashkirs are European and not Central Asian.

    In Triska et al. 2017 (Between Lake Baikal and the Baltic Sea: genomic history of the gateway to Europe), Bashkirs had fairly high ancient IBD sharing with Khanty:



    The same paper suspected that the ancestors Bashkirs would have shifted their language during the Turkic expansion:

    Tatar share moderate amount of IBD (3.55–7.35 cM per pair) with all neighbouring populations, while Bashkir share most of their ancient blocks (on average 8.62 cM per pair) with Khanty, a group of Uralic speakers from Western Siberia. We speculate that this disparity between cultural and genetic affinities of Tatar and Bashkir can be attributed to a phenomenon of cultural dominance: the population ancestral to Bashkir adopted the Turkic language during Turkic expansion from the east (language replacement event).

    According to Post et al. 2019 (Y-chromosomal connection between Hungarians and geographically distant populations of the Ural Mountain region and West Siberia), Bashkirs share N3a4-B539 with Mansi and Khanty:

    Hg N3a4-B539 (Fig. 3c), on the other hand, is prevalent among Turkic speaking Bashkirs and also found in Tatars but is entirely missing from other populations of the Volga-Ural region such as Uralic speaking Udmurts, Maris, Komis and Mordvins, and in Northeast Europe, where instead N3a4-B535 lineages are frequent. Besides Bashkirs and Tatars in Volga-Ural region, N3a4-B539 is substantially represented in West Siberia among Ugric speaking Mansis and Khantys.

    There are Bashkirs who look very "Uralische":

    Spoiler!
    I think it is not because of simply linguistical change during Turkic expansion, but probably some Uralic population already absorbed in process of the creation of the Turkic ethnicity which brings Turks their Euro-like Steppe admixture. I don't eliminate the first option, but regarding ancient DNA of Turks, some already plot(or get in high amounts) Uralic even Ugric populations.
    qpAdm: Bulgarian_1.DG= 77 - Kimak.SG= 23, p= 0.36, se= 0.31.
    Y: Q-L330 > Q-YP771 > Q-BZ180 > Q-F16045* (F15008*) --> Baikal N, Altai MLBA, Aldy-Bel, Pazyryk, Hun.
    MT: K1a --> Iron Gates, Starcevo, Bulgaria N, Bulgaria CA, Bulgaria BA.

  5. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Last Online
    07-17-2021 @ 07:07 AM
    Ethnicity
    Finnish
    Country
    Finland
    Gender
    Posts
    1,679
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,840
    Given: 2,076

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Leto View Post
    I never said they were European. They aren't white by any means unless you consider half East Asian people white (which I don't).
    Just to clarify - there is nothing wrong with them, in fact their racial make up reflects their history and geographical location (transcontinental, at the crossroads of Eastern Europe and Central Asia/South Siberia).
    Southern Bashkirs have Kalmyk admixture, but northern Bashkirs are far less than half Mongoloid (https://www.researchgate.net/figure/...fig5_332747456):



    Bashkirs are semi-white in the same way as Southern Europeans. They are just mixed with different kind of Asians (North or Central and not West). Even Greeks are geographically European even though they are racially mostly non-European.

  6. #16
    Not even a member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Last Online
    Today @ 10:45 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Indo-European, Slavic
    Ethnicity
    Russian
    Country
    Brunei
    Region
    Russian Turkestan General Governorship
    Y-DNA
    R1a-YP270
    Religion
    Orthodox
    Gender
    Posts
    24,142
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 15,591
    Given: 8,909

    3 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ymyyakhtakh View Post
    Bashkirs are semi-white in the same way as Southern Europeans. They are just mixed with different kind of Asians (North or Central and not West). Even Greeks are geographically European even though they are racially mostly non-European.
    Bullshit. Go troll somewhere else. Southern Europeans are not half East Eurasian, they are nearly entirely West Eurasian/Caucasoid.

    Bashkirs are ca. 40% mongoloid on average. The least mong samples I've seen were in the low 30s.

  7. #17
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Last Online
    07-17-2021 @ 07:07 AM
    Ethnicity
    Finnish
    Country
    Finland
    Gender
    Posts
    1,679
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,840
    Given: 2,076

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Leto View Post
    Bullshit. Go troll somewhere else. Southern Europeans are not half East Eurasian, they are nearly entirely West Eurasian/Caucasoid.

    Bashkirs are ca. 40% mongoloid on average. The least mong samples I've seen were in the low 30s.
    Please don't use swear words. Maris are about 30% or 35% Mongoloid, and they look way more white than Greeks or Bulgarians.

  8. #18
    Veteran Member Blondie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Last Online
    Today @ 04:49 PM
    Location
    Budapest
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Zoomer
    Country
    Germany
    Region
    Donau Schwaben
    Taxonomy
    Subnordid
    Gender
    Posts
    17,979
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 15,257
    Given: 9,844

    3 Not allowed!

    Default

    Baskhirs have very homogeneous r1b paternal origin and it's not turkic by origin but totally different from other turkic peoples. I don't understand why do turkics claim every single haplogroup as "native turkic" what they have today and why do they deny that they assimilated many other non turkic tribes and peoples during the history. That's why turkics nowadays have different genetic from each toher and totally different paternal origin baskhirs are mostly r1b, yakuts are N, Kazakhs are C Turkmens are Q, turks are J etc etc...

  9. #19
    Bloodline of 5/42 Evzone Regiment
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    catgeorge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Last Online
    @
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Hellenic
    Ethnicity
    Greek
    Ancestry
    Byzantine Rumelia
    Country
    Antarctica
    Y-DNA
    R1b
    Politics
    Christian Theocratic
    Hero
    Christian Emperors
    Religion
    Orthodox Christian
    Age
    37
    Gender
    Posts
    13,042
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8,923
    Given: 4,821

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Turks have the most colourful YDNA pie chart on the planet

    “For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” Eph. 6:12

    Definition of untrustworthy and loose character are those that don't believe in God.


  10. #20
    Bloodline of 5/42 Evzone Regiment
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    catgeorge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Last Online
    @
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Hellenic
    Ethnicity
    Greek
    Ancestry
    Byzantine Rumelia
    Country
    Antarctica
    Y-DNA
    R1b
    Politics
    Christian Theocratic
    Hero
    Christian Emperors
    Religion
    Orthodox Christian
    Age
    37
    Gender
    Posts
    13,042
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8,923
    Given: 4,821

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ymyyakhtakh View Post
    Please don't use swear words. Maris are about 30% or 35% Mongoloid, and they look way more white than Greeks or Bulgarians.
    Sure, but in Greece they're Mongols.
    “For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” Eph. 6:12

    Definition of untrustworthy and loose character are those that don't believe in God.


Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Bashkir woman ( Origin of Beauty project)
    By mutabor in forum Taxonomy
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 12-22-2019, 04:15 PM
  2. classify original Kurgan Turks: Bashkir people
    By Proto-Shaman in forum Taxonomy
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-10-2017, 06:10 PM
  3. Origin of the Semitic people where was it?
    By StonyArabia in forum Anthropology
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 09-04-2015, 04:45 AM
  4. Origin of Germanic people
    By Brännvin in forum European Culture
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 07-06-2014, 02:59 PM
  5. Origin of Romany People
    By Mortimer in forum Anthropology
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 06-11-2012, 06:00 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •