0
Yes
No
Thumbs Up |
Received: 301 Given: 286 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 182 Given: 128 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 301 Given: 286 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 182 Given: 128 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 182 Given: 128 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,160 Given: 3,931 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,429 Given: 2,713 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,258 Given: 3,510 |
I have always seen them as people of mixed heritage: Altaic, Caucasian, Persian and middle eastern, which middle eastern includes both anatolian and Levantine
so the answer is no, only partially Arab
Thumbs Up |
Received: 11,836 Given: 7,303 |
Meson, Arabs have never been part of Turkish history. Controlling of Arabia was not directly but by assigning governors. Even during the era Turks settled in Mesopotamia there were Iranic and native populations, borders of Arabs reached such degree after Turkic community disappeared in the region.
Turkic people have been in Iran, Caucasia, Anatolia and the Balkans but not in Arabian Peninsula.
None of Turks have Arabic genes. Even Iraqi Turkmens have native admixture but not Arabian.
qpAdm: Bulgarian_1.DG= 77 - Kimak.SG= 23, p= 0.36, se= 0.31.
Y: Q-L330 > Q-YP771 > Q-BZ180 > Q-F16045* (F15008*) --> Baikal N, Altai MLBA, Aldy-Bel, Pazyryk, Hun.
MT: K1a --> Iron Gates, Starcevo, Bulgaria N, Bulgaria CA, Bulgaria BA.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks