| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 1,681 Given: 936 |
Id vote for Anthony Joshua.
I dont really like very muscular men, he is on borderline for my taste
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 26,206 Given: 43,748 |
So why still him over James Haskell?Originally Posted by pajkosbalna
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 1,681 Given: 936 |
Not as muscular as James Haskell, and to me he is more handsome
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 26,206 Given: 43,748 |
Are you sure? To me they look about on par.
Well OK.and to me he is more handsome
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 1,681 Given: 936 |
Maybe thats an even in case of muscles (apart from visible sixpacks which I dont really prefer).
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 3,583 Given: 5,443 |
The rugby player looks better. It's not the size of his muscles or the definition but the shape that makes him better looking. It's said that the back makes or breaks a man but I believe the chest is equally important.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 24,202 Given: 15,977 |
AJ
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 26,206 Given: 43,748 |
Last edited by Tooting Carmen; 03-24-2020 at 08:19 PM.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 1,985 Given: 783 |
I don't find either man to be super attractive, but AJ is def. my pick between the two.
"Tainted souls who try to purify themselves with blood are like the man who steps in filth and thinks to bathe in sewage."
- Heraclitus
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 26,206 Given: 43,748 |
How come?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks