0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,636 Given: 40 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,667 Given: 5,726 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,983 Given: 2,435 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,173 Given: 5,255 |
Paleo-Balkanic/Slavic mix.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,471 Given: 1,541 |
Czech - those villages were founded by Sorbian refugees as the Franks conquered their land. that's the local oral tradition.
Poland - the same as above, and some of those places were properties of this family: https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarbski who gave them those names.
Iran and Turkey - might be connected with this : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shirvan
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,636 Given: 40 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,243 Given: 2,623 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,636 Given: 40 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,471 Given: 1,541 |
Slavs settled on the southern coast of Sweden and Finland, maybe some of them were Serbs? there is some ph908 there too.
Ras and Raška are younger name than Serb and Serbia. they appear later in the middle ages. so it makes no sense to connect them to early medieval Serbs.
anyway ethnotoponyms (towns named after an ethnicity) appear only there where that ethnicity is foreign, on the edge of that ethnicity's territory or completely surrounded by other ethnicities.
like those towns in Czechia were founded by Sorbs who settled in a majority Czech(Slavic tribe) region.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,864 Given: 444 |
Back at it with some more lying, as usual. No sources, because when are sources even relevant in a debate, who heard of such a thing. I just googled this text and to the utter shock of the whole world, zero finds, nil:
https://prnt.sc/r4kdna
Not to even mention that you speak of Medieval Romanian based on a text from the 16th century, haha, as if the Renaissance never happened. Dude, by the 16th century Europe has largely left the Middle Ages for almost two centuries. Another symptom of Romanian Nationalism, when they try to push their history as far back in time as they can to justify some type of ancientness and primordial rights. It's called Protochronims:
"Is a term reffering to pseudohistorical, pseudolinguistic, and pseudoarchaeological theories that claim that Romania is the cradle of civilization, that all or many peoples are branches of Romanians, and that all or many languages are derived from Romanian, among other things. Like most pseudosciences, Protochronism does this by presenting the reader or viewer with a large quantity of half-truths, cherry-picked quotes, non sequiturs, misrepresentations of others' views, and outright falsehoods — an avalanche of arguments which the non-savvy might mistake for proofs."
Your envy and insecurities are most evident when confronted with all the evidence to the much more earlier and richer Hungarian writing tradition compared to yours. It's time to show some humility and retract your tail, because you will come out more and more humiliated in this debate.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks