Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27

Thread: Where does Ottoman Empire start

  1. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Diyar-ı Rum
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Ar-Rum, Ottoman, Byzantine
    Ethnicity
    Bosniak
    Ancestry
    25% N.Macedonian, 25% Albanian + 50% Dalmatia Slavic mixed Vlach
    Country
    Bosnia
    Region
    Dalmatia
    Y-DNA
    I2
    mtDNA
    H28
    Taxonomy
    Dinarid + Pontid
    Politics
    Neo-Ottomanism
    Hero
    Tzepeles Komnenos, Mehmed II
    Religion
    Ottoman Islam
    Gender
    Posts
    17,720
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8,216
    Given: 5,754

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cumansky View Post
    Constantinople was Byzantine before anything, but where does Ottoman Empire start, after all those centuries it can drawn on a map
    and Ottomans were Byzantines before conversion to Islam.

  2. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Last Online
    07-11-2020 @ 03:40 AM
    Ethnicity
    Basarab Laiota
    Country
    Moldova
    Y-DNA
    I2 (Carpathian)
    Gender
    Posts
    7,568
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,208
    Given: 1,745

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bosniensis View Post
    and Ottomans were Byzantines before conversion to Islam.
    I think most of them were Balkaners, but some were Oghuz conquerors from Asia that passed thru Azerbaijan, etc

  3. #13
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    tipirneni's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Last Online
    04-23-2024 @ 03:20 PM
    Location
    Texas
    Meta-Ethnicity
    South Asian
    Ethnicity
    Indian
    Ancestry
    Salkhit 625SNP, Otzi 803SNP, Mik15 798SNP, RISE493 1335SNP, I11456 1024SNP, I7718 980SNP, I9041 512S
    Country
    United States
    Region
    Texas
    Y-DNA
    H-M82 Z5890+Z34522+
    mtDNA
    U2a1a3*
    Taxonomy
    sub-brachycephalic+Atlanto-Mediterranean+Caucasus-Alpine
    Hero
    James Bond
    Religion
    Hindu
    Gender
    Posts
    2,669
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,458
    Given: 1,641

    1 Not allowed!

    Default


    Ctesiphon
    Yfull [B]ID: YF83218 admix -> https://i.ibb.co/NjwQTz6/myherit1.png
    G25 Distance: 1.0778%
    86.2 IRN_Shahr_I_Sokhta_BA2
    5.2 ITA_Sardinia_C_o:I15940 1.4 ITA_Daunian
    3.6 PAK_Saidu_Sharif_H
    3.6 VK2020_SWE_Gotland_VA:VK464

  4. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Diyar-ı Rum
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Ar-Rum, Ottoman, Byzantine
    Ethnicity
    Bosniak
    Ancestry
    25% N.Macedonian, 25% Albanian + 50% Dalmatia Slavic mixed Vlach
    Country
    Bosnia
    Region
    Dalmatia
    Y-DNA
    I2
    mtDNA
    H28
    Taxonomy
    Dinarid + Pontid
    Politics
    Neo-Ottomanism
    Hero
    Tzepeles Komnenos, Mehmed II
    Religion
    Ottoman Islam
    Gender
    Posts
    17,720
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8,216
    Given: 5,754

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cumansky View Post
    I think most of them were Balkaners, but some were Oghuz conquerors from Asia that passed thru Azerbaijan, etc
    George of Trebizond explained the best:

    He addressed the new ruler of the Empire, Mehmed the Conqueror, in a letter of 1466, as the legal emperor of the Romans and of the whole Universe and also as the common emperor of both Romans and Turks.

    Dimitri Kitsikis, from the time of the Persian Empire and Alexander the Great, to the collapse of the Ottoman Empire in the 20th century A.D., the Intermediate Region has been covered by an ecumenical empire that had common civilizational characteristics, despite the fact that it passed into the hands successively of the Persians, to the Greeks, to the Romans, to the Byzantines and, finally, to the Ottomans. This central civilization of the Intermediate Region, existing since the time of Cyrus the Great, bore the characteristics, since the 11th century A.D. and for the last thousand years, of Greek and Turkish cultures.


    Basically, Turks became a new addition to already established mix of: Balkaners, Greeks, Armenians, Syrians and Anatolian Persians.

    But the Empire.. was the same old Empire as George identified.

    Claiming that Ottoman Empire isn't Byzantine Empire is like claiming that modern Iranians aren't Persians because they are muslims and don't use Old Persian language.

  5. #15
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Last Online
    04-08-2024 @ 04:46 PM
    Ethnicity
    Human
    Country
    Burkina-Faso
    Gender
    Posts
    1,191
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 490
    Given: 741

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bosniensis View Post
    and Ottomans were Byzantines before conversion to Islam.
    I tend to agree with this. The original Turks were central Asian but Ottoman Empire was the resurrection of the Byzantine empire just like Safavid empire was the resurrection of the sassanid empire

  6. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Last Online
    01-07-2021 @ 11:31 AM
    Location
    Black Knight satellite
    Ethnicity
    Zeta Reticulan
    Country
    Antarctica
    Politics
    Copernican Principle
    Gender
    Posts
    3,211
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,346
    Given: 1,328

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cumansky View Post
    Vlad not looking for smartass answers, I want real discussion on my history
    Ok Kuba, then I guess it both starts and ends in Turkey, maaaaybe a bit more to the Middle East.

  7. #17
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Last Online
    07-11-2020 @ 03:40 AM
    Ethnicity
    Basarab Laiota
    Country
    Moldova
    Y-DNA
    I2 (Carpathian)
    Gender
    Posts
    7,568
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,208
    Given: 1,745

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bosniensis View Post

    Basically, Turks became a new addition to already established mix of: Balkaners, Greeks, Armenians, Syrians and Anatolian Persians.

    But the Empire.. was the same old Empire as George identified.
    This is what happened in my land:

    The Hungarian conquest of the Carpathian Basin was a series of events resulting in the settlement of the Hungarians at the turn of the 9th and 10th centuries. Before the arrival of the Hungarian Conquerors (or Proto-Hungarians), three medieval powers were fighting for control of the Carpathian Basin - the First Bulgarian Empire, East Francia and Moravia. Occasionally they would hire Proto-Hungarian horsemen as soldiers. These people who lived on the Pontic Steppes became familiar with their future homeland as a result. After they were attacked by the Bulgarians and Pechengs in 894, the Proto-Hungarians crossed the Carpathian Mountains and took over the lowlands east of the Danube, and then went into Pannonia. Then by defeating a Bavarian army in 907, they launched a series of plundering raids. Gradually they began settling in the Basin and established a monarchy, the Kingdom of Hungary in 1000 AD and ruled over the existing peoples of the region at this time including Slavs, Greeks, Germans, Moravians and Vlachs."

  8. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Diyar-ı Rum
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Ar-Rum, Ottoman, Byzantine
    Ethnicity
    Bosniak
    Ancestry
    25% N.Macedonian, 25% Albanian + 50% Dalmatia Slavic mixed Vlach
    Country
    Bosnia
    Region
    Dalmatia
    Y-DNA
    I2
    mtDNA
    H28
    Taxonomy
    Dinarid + Pontid
    Politics
    Neo-Ottomanism
    Hero
    Tzepeles Komnenos, Mehmed II
    Religion
    Ottoman Islam
    Gender
    Posts
    17,720
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8,216
    Given: 5,754

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cumansky View Post
    This is what happened in my land:

    The Hungarian conquest of the Carpathian Basin was a series of events resulting in the settlement of the Hungarians at the turn of the 9th and 10th centuries. Before the arrival of the Hungarian Conquerors (or Proto-Hungarians), three medieval powers were fighting for control of the Carpathian Basin - the First Bulgarian Empire, East Francia and Moravia. Occasionally they would hire Proto-Hungarian horsemen as soldiers. These people who lived on the Pontic Steppes became familiar with their future homeland as a result. After they were attacked by the Bulgarians and Pechengs in 894, the Proto-Hungarians crossed the Carpathian Mountains and took over the lowlands east of the Danube, and then went into Pannonia. Then by defeating a Bavarian army in 907, they launched a series of plundering raids. Gradually they began settling in the Basin and established a monarchy, the Kingdom of Hungary in 1000 AD and ruled over the existing peoples of the region at this time including Slavs, Greeks, Germans, Moravians and Vlachs."

    Hungary is very complex.. it was under direct hit of so many enemies it's terrifying. From Attila onward.

  9. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Last Online
    07-11-2020 @ 03:40 AM
    Ethnicity
    Basarab Laiota
    Country
    Moldova
    Y-DNA
    I2 (Carpathian)
    Gender
    Posts
    7,568
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,208
    Given: 1,745

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bosniensis View Post
    George of Trebizond explained the best:

    He addressed the new ruler of the Empire, Mehmed the Conqueror, in a letter of 1466, as the legal emperor of the Romans and of the whole Universe and also as the common emperor of both Romans and Turks.

    Dimitri Kitsikis, from the time of the Persian Empire and Alexander the Great, to the collapse of the Ottoman Empire in the 20th century A.D., the Intermediate Region has been covered by an ecumenical empire that had common civilizational characteristics, despite the fact that it passed into the hands successively of the Persians, to the Greeks, to the Romans, to the Byzantines and, finally, to the Ottomans. This central civilization of the Intermediate Region, existing since the time of Cyrus the Great, bore the characteristics, since the 11th century A.D. and for the last thousand years, of Greek and Turkish cultures.


    Basically, Turks became a new addition to already established mix of: Balkaners, Greeks, Armenians, Syrians and Anatolian Persians.

    But the Empire.. was the same old Empire as George identified.

    Claiming that Ottoman Empire isn't Byzantine Empire is like claiming that modern Iranians aren't Persians because they are muslims and don't use Old Persian language.
    So was there Romani people in the Byzantine Empire?

    Why do modern Romani show up as Byzantine?

  10. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Last Online
    07-11-2020 @ 03:40 AM
    Ethnicity
    Basarab Laiota
    Country
    Moldova
    Y-DNA
    I2 (Carpathian)
    Gender
    Posts
    7,568
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,208
    Given: 1,745

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bosniensis View Post
    Hungary is very complex.. it was under direct hit of so many enemies it's terrifying. From Attila onward.
    There is alot of back migrations into Balkans that happened after Byzantine era too, I am part of that migration in the south

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Byzantine Empire vs Ottoman Empire
    By MinervaItalica in forum History
    Replies: 118
    Last Post: 08-12-2021, 01:57 PM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-11-2018, 06:10 AM
  3. The Ottoman Empire vs The British Empire
    By Ánleifr in forum History
    Replies: 70
    Last Post: 01-24-2018, 06:13 AM
  4. Ottoman Empire: a Balkan Empire
    By Ryujin in forum Türkiye
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 01-16-2018, 07:49 PM
  5. Decline of the Ottoman Empire
    By RussiaPrussia in forum History
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-20-2012, 01:50 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •