3
I understand its true what you say that some highly euro Cubans and highly euro brazilian scoring "high" NEA/SSA can be in canarian/azorean levels. But remember those are the minority of the thousands of samples i post in this sites. For example in this thread everybody posted is in the mestizo/pardo level. So this doesent even apply
And also take into consideration that not every canarian/azorian scores super high SSA/NEA . Some actually score low levels. So for a cuban/brazilian group to be in the same range as those euros you cannot have everybody scoring the max. You should be close to the average of that group.
And last I am not so sure that the low level compoents are always noise. For example somebody could say that the 0-2% SSA in regular iberians is noise, but i almost never see SSA in northern euro kits. So why should some nations score "noise" and others dont? i dont really think those low levels are always noise. I think they are something even when its small
User token laughed when i tried to explain him that the high siberian in latinos wasnt just noise or an error of the calculator. Here you have a siberian boxplot of 2 indomestizo nations vs iberia Do you think this is just noise? Its a very clear pattern that the calculator correctly sees in most samples, even when its small.
I am not saying this guys are siberian but there is something consistent in the results. IMO something related the Native American ancestry in those countries and clearly not european
Bookmarks