0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,624 Given: 21,630 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,306 Given: 1,198 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,624 Given: 21,630 |
y otra cosa, acaso no viene el porcentaje del individuo ideal según oriren en gedmatch? de ahí podéis sacar las proporciones ideales , no?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,624 Given: 21,630 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,306 Given: 1,198 |
Yeah, nMonte using G25. Also, I think commercial tests are more reliable for true percentages in Latin Americans. GEDmatch is already quite outdated even for Europeans. North Italians, for example, have immense distances in K13/K15 because they have just one fucking sample for North Italy. When someone has distances of 10-11 for his first population (like many Venetians) without being mixed you know that calculator isn't exactly the best.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 12,361 Given: 11,959 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,306 Given: 1,198 |
By the way, one of the reasons why Maghrebis were coming out 20-25% SSA in GEDmatch is because those calculators lack Iberomaurusian samples, that are extremely important to model North Africans. At the same time, they just have a dumb and unique ''SSA'' component for all of Sub-Saharan Africa, the most diverse region in the whole world.
Defending GEDmatch as an amazing tool at this point is very naive IMO. The creator of K13/K15 himself abandoned the platform.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 12,361 Given: 11,959 |
Lo que dice Adamastor es que como un azoriano o un canario puede salir por ejemplo 3% North east African y 3% SSA , entonces un brasilero o cubano en ese rango no deberia tomarse como un individuo de raza mixta. Y es verdad. Pero el tema es que el 90% de los latinos de gedmatch no estan en ese rango azoriano o canario. El 90% de latinos caribeños o brasileros de gedmatch tienen % de SSA/NEA que no podrian verse en un canario o azoriano, por lo cual no me parece que este dato tenga que invalidar todo le trabajo que hice.
Y sin mencionar que en este thread solo puse latinos en el rango 45-65% euro con lo cual mas que seguro el NEA/SSA es real. Que un canario salga 3% SSA no tiene ninguna importancia cundo los cubanos posteados en este thread son 30-50% SSA.
But whats the point in saying that when all latinos posted in this Thread are between 45-65% european? Most of the non white in this latinos is real amerindian/SSA. So whats the point of saying that in this thread?
most cubans posted in this thread for example are like 40% SSA
This mestizos/pardos posted in this thread are around 50% European so if an iberian is 2% SSA or 3% SSA, only 1/1.5% of the SSA could be "iberian". Its irrelevant.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,458 Given: 7,646 |
all this over irrelevant less than 1% SSA in Iberians? smh damn
a Cuban with 3 Canarian grandparents or even all 4 grandparents will be easily to tell apart from a Cuban with black African ancestry
how? the Northeast African will be higher in the Cuban with all 4 Canarian grandparents and have minor SSA
while the Cuban with most black African ancestry will have higher SSA and minor Northeastern African
the same way North Africans come out scoring and also Canarians, that is how you know whose black ancestry is ancient (Canarians), and whose is more recent (black admixed Latinos)
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,306 Given: 1,198 |
Well, yeah, I agree that my observations are not significant in those levels, from 40% to 42% SSA there's barely any difference, but we should take GEDmatch results with a grain of salt anyway. The tool is very old and even if it can show some interesting tendencies, it's still not designed for that. I like your work, I'm just pointing the problems with GEDmatch; there are better calculators right now.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks