Y-DNA lineages of Scythians, Sarmatians, Alans and related Steppe cultures.

[axlredneck]

DA220 Wusun: N-Y6503
DA224 Turk: R-Y52

[Amon]

Volga Sarmatians(x13): R-Y210282, N-Y6503, R-M420(x8), R-M343(x2), N-M231

Central Steppe Sarmatians(x2): R-BY30764, R-Z93

Arpads(x3): J-ZS7640, R-SUR51(x2)

[Chelubey]

Volga Sarmatians(x13):R-Y210282

Central Steppe Sarmatians(x2): R-BY30764

Karachay-Balkars subclades.

[Kaspias]

Thread can be updated with the recent article:

A dynamic 6,000-year genetic history of Eurasia’s Eastern Steppe

[Amon]

Kushnarenkovo & related cultures(x2): N-Y24361(x7), G-L1266, J-M172, N-M46(x19), R-M343

[Leto]

...

So you're axlredneck, aren't you? That account doesn't seem to be banned though.

[Amon]

So you're axlredneck, aren't you? That account doesn't seem to be banned though.

No, we're neighbors.

[xripkan]

Ancient samples analyzed further, by Pribislav.

Kangju: R-F1019
Tian-Shan Hun: R-F1019

--------------------------
Other samples:
Tian-Shan Hun: N-Y16220 (likely)
Tian-Shan Hun: E-L1250

--------------------------
Shirenzigou nomad(x1): R-Z93

The R-F1019 samples are

DA229; 250 BC-250 AD; Kaynar Bulak 2, Kazakhstan; Kangju and

DA52; 403-434 AD; Keden, Kyrgyzstan; Tian_Shan_Hun

The first one plots close to ancient Iranics while the second onr is autosoamlly Turkic.
These two results may indicate the process of turkification of R-F1019 clade.

[Chelubey]

The R-F1019 samples are

DA229; 250 BC-250 AD; Kaynar Bulak 2, Kazakhstan; Kangju and

DA52; 403-434 AD; Keden, Kyrgyzstan; Tian_Shan_Hun

The first one plots close to ancient Iranics while the second onr is autosoamlly Turkic.
These two results may indicate the process of turkification of R-F1019 clade.

Through women?

[Chelubey]

Already ,in my opinion, it is obvious that the increase in the East Eurasian component in the steppe populations at the end of 1st millennium BC - at the beginning of the 1st millennium AD is due to the fact that R1 males often married East Eurasian women. Subclades of hg R1 continue to dominate even among the Huns.
This is not like the conquest - turkization model.
In addition, the Karachai-Balkar subclades Z-93 are not descendants of the subclades of the Mongolian Huns.