Does anthrotardism make people dumber?

[Creoda]

One has to be a bit stupid in the first place to believe in these so-called 'races' that supposedly exist within nations, families even. I was utterly bemused by these categories when I came across this forum, and still am.

[Defcon2]

Taxonomy stuff should not even exist in my opinion.
Most of these terms and conventions were created by a Neo-Nazi Austrian guy around 12 years ago named Agrippa, an avid member of anthroboards which is probably now a prisoner. He basically dumbed down typological anthropology works so his Neo-Nazi friends could understand it and start 'classifying' people based on images.

They base their racial classifications on pre-established "canons" in their minds.
For example, a person who possesses dark pigmentation immediately classifies it as "med" or partially "med".
The labels are based on geographical criteria, that is to say seas, mountains, geographical position and even countries / tribes, this is because it is impossible to know to which race a person belongs without making use of other things that help to maintain a certain coherence. If they were based only on skin color, they would find that the vast majority of people would be placed in the same category, which would no longer be useful. If they did it with hair color it would be even worse, etc.

This added to the countries is when the demon comes out, because it would be necessary to put in a trunk people who do not fit in the pre-established canon and do as if it did not exist, a person with blue eyes and blond hair in southern Europe would be listed not as "med", but as "Nordic" or any other shit. In other words, they deprive him of his place of origin without remorse.
Since it is impossible to put an entire country into the same racial category.

Everything is translation from Spanish I hope Google has behaved well.

[Trouble]

They base their racial classifications on pre-established "canons" in their minds.
For example, a person who possesses dark pigmentation immediately classifies it as "med" or partially "med".
The labels are based on geographical criteria, that is to say seas, mountains, geographical position and even countries / tribes, this is because it is impossible to know to which race a person belongs without making use of other things that help to maintain a certain coherence. If they were based only on skin color, they would find that the vast majority of people would be placed in the same category, which would no longer be useful. If they did it with hair color it would be even worse, etc.

This added to the countries is when the demon comes out, because it would be necessary to put in a trunk people who do not fit in the pre-established canon and do as if it did not exist, a person with blue eyes and blond hair in southern Europe would be listed not as "med", but as "Nordic" or any other shit. In other words, they deprive him of his place of origin without remorse.
Since it is impossible to put an entire country into the same racial category.

Everything is translation from Spanish I hope Google has behaved well.

it is very coherent

[Joso]

Taxonomy stuff should not even exist in my opinion.
Most of these terms and conventions were created by a Neo-Nazi Austrian guy around 12 years ago named Agrippa, an avid member of anthroboards which is probably now a prisoner. He basically dumbed down typological anthropology works so his Neo-Nazi friends could understand it and start 'classifying' people based on images.

WTF
Why i only know this now,!?

[Samnium]

Anyway, there are more scholarly books than that but since my main focus is IT (information technology) I do not have time for it. Everyone in Silicon Valley has read Sapiens, anyway. Again, in General, books > internet.

Why waste a lot time on the internet when you could be reading a book instead ? That is my logic and why I really do not post here anymore.

Dude, Sapiens is full of historical and factual errors.

It has been debunked many times.

Yuval Noah Harari should have carried on his research about militaries in the Crusades.

[Joso]

Still, i don't believe anthropology is totally inutile, much of looks can be explained by habits, health, environment, age and so on, as well.
I look much different nowadays than i looked last year, like a completely different person, almost.
And i Will certainly look even more different nex year if i keep this way.
Some persons develop differently from the others.

[Joso]

People here have no Idea about facial and body development..

[Trouble]

Still, i don't believe anthropology is totally inutile, much of looks can be explained by habits, health, environment, age and so on, as well.
I look much different nowadays than i looked last year, like a completely different person, almost.
And i Will certainly look even more different nex year if i keep this way.
Some persons develop differently from the others.

Also, I can guarantee people look different in different photos and in real life. I get different responses about what I look like with different photo angles and quality. I can guarantee people may see something else when they see someone in person vs. online.

[luc2112]

There are considerable differences in the three main races (white, black and Mongolian) their behavior is not the same. There are intermediaries, it confuses.

The majority of this forum based its racism on egocentrism, it doesn't have a rational reason (not all racists are stupid), although racism does not exist (for those who do not understand anything about race) what exists is ethnic prejudice.

[Joso]

There are considerable differences in the three main races (white, black and Mongolian) their behavior is not the same. There are intermediaries, it confuses.

The majority of this forum based its racism on egocentrism, it doesn't have a rational reason (not all racists are stupid), although racism does not exist (for those who do not understand anything about race) what exists is ethnic prejudice.

Agree with the bolded part specially, an interesting point you have touched.