Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Coronavirus and the Sun: A Lesson from the 1918 Influenza Pandemic

  1. #1
    Veteran Member wvwvw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Last Online
    03-02-2024 @ 11:38 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Homo neogrecous
    Ethnicity
    Yes
    Country
    Japan
    Region
    Acadia
    mtDNA
    H
    Politics
    oh look. the curve is flattening.
    Age
    36
    Gender
    Posts
    31,839
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,431
    Given: 241

    1 Not allowed!

    Default Coronavirus and the Sun: A Lesson from the 1918 Influenza Pandemic

    Coronavirus and the Sun
    A Lesson from the 1918 Influenza Pandemic
    By Richard Hobday
    March 14, 2020

    When new, virulent diseases emerge, such SARS and Covid-19, the race begins to find new vaccines and treatments for those affected. As the current crisis unfolds, governments are enforcing quarantine and isolation, and public gatherings are being discouraged. Health officials took the same approach 100 years ago, when influenza was spreading around the world. The results were mixed. But records from the 1918 pandemic suggest one technique for dealing with influenza — little-known today — was effective. Some hard-won experience from the greatest pandemic in recorded history could help us in the weeks and months ahead.

    Put simply, medics found that severely ill flu patients nursed outdoors recovered better than those treated indoors. A combination of fresh air and sunlight seems to have prevented deaths among patients; and infections among medical staff.[1] There is scientific support for this. Research shows that outdoor air is a natural disinfectant. Fresh air can kill the flu virus and other harmful germs. Equally, sunlight is germicidal and there is now evidence it can kill the flu virus.


    Influenza patients getting sunlight at the Camp Brooks emergency open-air hospital in Boston. Medical staff were not supposed to remove their masks. (National Archives)

    `Open-Air’ Treatment in 1918


    During the great pandemic, two of the worst places to be were military barracks and troop-ships. Overcrowding and bad ventilation put soldiers and sailors at high risk of catching influenza and the other infections that often followed it.[2,3] As with the current Covid-19 outbreak, most of the victims of so-called `Spanish flu’ did not die from influenza: they died of pneumonia and other complications.

    When the influenza pandemic reached the East coast of the United States in 1918, the city of Boston was particularly badly hit. So the State Guard set up an emergency hospital. They took in the worst cases among sailors on ships in Boston harbour. The hospital’s medical officer had noticed the most seriously ill sailors had been in badly-ventilated spaces. So he gave them as much fresh air as possible by putting them in tents. And in good weather they were taken out of their tents and put in the sun. At this time, it was common practice to put sick soldiers outdoors. Open-air therapy, as it was known, was widely used on casualties from the Western Front. And it became the treatment of choice for another common and often deadly respiratory infection of the time; tuberculosis. Patients were put outside in their beds to breathe fresh outdoor air. Or they were nursed in cross-ventilated wards with the windows open day and night. The open-air regimen remained popular until antibiotics replaced it in the 1950s.

    Doctors who had first-hand experience of open-air therapy at the hospital in Boston were convinced the regimen was effective. It was adopted elsewhere. If one report is correct, it reduced deaths among hospital patients from 40 per cent to about 13 per cent.[4] According to the Surgeon General of the Massachusetts State Guard:

    `The efficacy of open air treatment has been absolutely proven, and one has only to try it to discover its value.’

    Fresh Air is a Disinfectant

    Patients treated outdoors were less likely to be exposed to the infectious germs that are often present in conventional hospital wards. They were breathing clean air in what must have been a largely sterile environment. We know this because, in the 1960s, Ministry of Defence scientists proved that fresh air is a natural disinfectant.[5] Something in it, which they called the Open Air Factor, is far more harmful to airborne bacteria — and the influenza virus — than indoor air. They couldn’t identify exactly what the Open Air Factor is. But they found it was effective both at night and during the daytime.

    Their research also revealed that the Open Air Factor’s disinfecting powers can be preserved in enclosures — if ventilation rates are kept high enough. Significantly, the rates they identified are the same ones that cross-ventilated hospital wards, with high ceilings and big windows, were designed for.[6] But by the time the scientists made their discoveries, antibiotic therapy had replaced open-air treatment. Since then the germicidal effects of fresh air have not featured in infection control, or hospital design. Yet harmful bacteria have become increasingly resistant to antibiotics.

    Sunlight and Influenza Infection

    Putting infected patients out in the sun may have helped because it inactivates the influenza virus.[7] It also kills bacteria that cause lung and other infections in hospitals.[8] During the First World War, military surgeons routinely used sunlight to heal infected wounds.[9] They knew it was a disinfectant. What they didn’t know is that one advantage of placing patients outside in the sun is they can synthesise vitamin D in their skin if sunlight is strong enough. This was not discovered until the 1920s. Low vitamin D levels are now linked to respiratory infections and may increase susceptibility to influenza.[10] Also, our body’s biological rhythms appear to influence how we resist infections.[11] New research suggests they can alter our inflammatory response to the flu virus.[12] As with vitamin D, at the time of the 1918 pandemic, the important part played by sunlight in synchronizing these rhythms was not known.

    Face Masks Coronavirus and Flu

    Surgical masks are currently in short supply in China and elsewhere. They were worn 100 years ago, during the great pandemic, to try and stop the influenza virus spreading. While surgical masks may offer some protection from infection they do not seal around the face. So they don’t filter out small airborne particles. In 1918, anyone at the emergency hospital in Boston who had contact with patients had to wear an improvised face mask. This comprised five layers of gauze fitted to a wire frame which covered the nose and mouth. The frame was shaped to fit the face of the wearer and prevent the gauze filter touching the mouth and nostrils. The masks were replaced every two hours; properly sterilized and with fresh gauze put on. They were a forerunner of the N95 respirators in use in hospitals today to protect medical staff against airborne infection.

    Temporary Hospitals

    Staff at the hospital kept up high standards of personal and environmental hygiene. No doubt this played a big part in the relatively low rates of infection and deaths reported there. The speed with which their hospital and other temporary open-air facilities were erected to cope with the surge in pneumonia patients was another factor. Today, many countries are not prepared for a severe influenza pandemic.[13] Their health services will be overwhelmed if there is one. Vaccines and antiviral drugs might help. Antibiotics may be effective for pneumonia and other complications. But much of the world’s population will not have access to them. If another 1918 comes, or the Covid-19 crisis gets worse, history suggests it might be prudent to have tents and pre-fabricated wards ready to deal with large numbers of seriously ill cases. Plenty of fresh air and a little sunlight might help too.

    Dr. Richard Hobday is an independent researcher working in the fields of infection control, public health and building design. He is the author of `The Healing Sun’.

    https://medium.com/@ra.hobday/corona...c-509151dc8065

  2. #2
    TA fisherman association TheMaestro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 03:26 PM
    Ethnicity
    Fisherman remnant
    Country
    South Africa
    Region
    Texas
    Politics
    Reformed Centrist
    Gender
    Posts
    19,346
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 17,124
    Given: 9,064

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    History has shown, people don't like to learn from their mistakes.

  3. #3
    Veteran Member The Lawspeaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Last Online
    11-05-2023 @ 04:45 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Dutch
    Ancestry
    Brabant, Holland, Guelders and some Hainaut.
    Country
    Netherlands
    Politics
    Norway Deal-NEXIT, Dutch Realm Atlanticist, Habsburg Legitimist
    Religion
    Sedevacantist
    Relationship Status
    Engaged
    Age
    36
    Gender
    Posts
    70,134
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 34,728
    Given: 61,131

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    The Chinese now use UV-light to disinfect buses. They might want to try something similar here. Plant moderated UV-lighting in hospital rooms..



    Wake up and smell the coffee.


  4. #4
    I was blind but now I see
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Sebastianus Rex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Last Online
    02-27-2024 @ 12:51 PM
    Ethnicity
    Portuguese
    Country
    Portugal
    Gender
    Posts
    10,324
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8,655
    Given: 5,621

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Makes total sense, the deficit of vitamin D is a plague of the modern world, affects 80% of the population. It is vital for having a competent imune system, alot of diseases could be avoided if the medicine was more focused on prevention and nutrition instead of selling drugs that don't treat the root cause.

    Italian studies detected that most victims of the virus had severe vitamin D insuficiency.

    Also the mortality rate of Afro-americans caused by the virus is out of proportion even considering that many of them don't have acess to decent healthcare. People with dark skin need much more sun exposure to produce the necessary amount of vitamin D. On average a fair skin individual needs to have 80% of the skin exposed during 20 minutes at the sun (preferably around noon) to produce 10.000 un of viatmin D while dark skin individuals need 8-10 times more exposure to produce the same quantity.

    Also being always indoor with other sick persons means that patients are constantly at risk of being exposed to higher viral charges. When they start to get better they might get another viral charge and the imune system just can't deal with it.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-14-2020, 12:22 PM
  2. How a Pandemic could END CIVILIZATION
    By The Lawspeaker in forum News Articles
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-30-2020, 04:29 AM
  3. Replies: 78
    Last Post: 07-24-2019, 08:32 PM
  4. The spanish influenza epidemic of 1918 was caused by vaccinations
    By European blood in forum Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-16-2011, 01:33 AM
  5. Survey Finds Six in Ten Americans Believe Serious Outbreak of Influenza in Fall
    By Sol Invictus in forum Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-06-2009, 12:09 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •