French King Louis XVI Mystery

[Epirus DNA]

They say that Louis XVI has no living descendants.
MyTrueAncestry says I am related to King Louis XVI.

Were the French Elites of Hellenic origin?



French King Louis XVI Mystery
Y-DNA Haplogroup: G2a
mtDNA Haplogroup: N1b

French revolutionists condemned King Louis XVI to death on 21. January 1793 by means of the guillotine at the Place de la Revolution in Paris (roughly where the Obelisk decorating the Place de la Concorde stands today). After a short but defiant speech he lost his head as the crowd rushed to the scaffold to dip hankerchiefs into his blood as momentos. An ornate gourd decorated with French Revolution themes was recently uncovered which had contained a blood soaked hankerchief dating to this time. The gourd was allegedly a gift to Napoleon Bonaparte who became First Consul of France in 1799 and Emperor in 1804. An anonymous Italian family was in its posession since possibly the late 1800s and came forward with the relic. It bears an inscription that Maximilien Bourdaloue on 21. January dipped his hankerchief in the blood of the king. Dried blood was scraped out and this is the same DNA we present in this DNA spotlight! The sample contains unsually high and rare markers for the Y-DNA haplogroup G2a.

King Louis XVI's direct male line ancestor Henri IV was famous for enacting the Edict of Nantes which guaranteed religious liberties to Protestants ending 30 years of fighting between French Protestants and Catholics - he was assassinated in 1610 by a French Catholic zealot. The remains had been presumed lost in the chaos of the French Revolution after a mob of revolutionaries desecrated the graves of French kings in the royal chapel of Saint-Denis in Paris in 1793. However, the head was passed down over the centuries by secretive private collectors and positively identified in 2010 with a radiocarbon date between 1450 and 1650. The features were consistent with the king's face including a dark mushroom-like lesion near the right nostril, a healed facial stab wound and a pierced right earlobe. The hair color and moustache and beard on the mummified head fit the appearance of the king at the time of his death as well as matched his portraits. Furthermore cutting wounds were visible corresponding to the separation of the head from the body in 1793 and digital facial reconstruction of the skull matched the plaster mould of his face made just after his death in 1610. The DNA was then tested and compared to the blood from the gourd.

DNA analysis comparing the dried head of Henri IV and the blood of Louis XVI show they were both G2a haplogroups and that with 95 percent confidence they were 246 times more likely than not to be related. Louis XVII, the 10 year old son of Louis XVI and Marie-Antoinette died from illness or poisoning in prison and his heart was kept in a crystal vase in the Cathedral Basilica of St. Denis - as of today only the female haplogroup analysis has been done to the heart proving his maternal link. Three living direct male-line descendants of Henri IV and Louis XVI had their DNA analyzed to determine their Y-DNA haplogroups. They were all determined to have the Y haplogroup R1b1b2a1a1b (R-Z381). Two of these men draw their male line back to Louis, the Duke of Burgundy (1682-1712), the great grandfather of Louis XVI. The third descended from Louis XIII (1601-1643) who was Henri IV's son. However this contradicts the haplogroup G2a shared by both the mummified head of Henri IV and the blood of Louis XVI. This has created quite a mystery as there is a large set of physical evidence confirming the head was indeed Henri IV's head which also matched the blood of Louis XVI.

Some simply claim the mummifed head and blood sample cannot be those of Henri IV and Louis XVI because the haplogroups don't match despite the vast physical evidence supporting the mummified head was indeed Henri IV. Others point to infidelity at the French court which some believe was fairly rampant. A nonpaternity event at key points in the royal lineage would explain why there was no Y-DNA match between the living members of the House of Bourbon and the head and blood samples. A third theory is that both relics were contaminated during the chaos of the French Revolution or later as they were passed from collect to collector. It seems this mystery could be finally resolved if Louis XVII's heart could be re-tested with today's technology - either it should reveal a Y haplogroup of G2a or R-Z381. Unfortunately the heart was removed from the crystal vase and buried alongside the bodies of Louis XVI and Marie-Antoinette in June 2004.

[Epirus DNA]

King Louis XVI's direct male line ancestor Henri IV. King Henry IV of France was the first Bourbon king of France. King Henry IV had six children with his wife Marie de' Medici and also had at least eleven illegitimate children with his many mistresses.

The Medici was an influential Maniot family. Cosimo di Giovanni de' Medici, called "the Elder" and posthumously "Father of the Fatherland", he assiduously attended the lectures delivered by Greek scholars, and at the age of 50 he became an ardent admirer of Plato. He then re-created Plato’s ancient academy in his villa of Careggi, where Marsilio Ficino became the Platonic cult’s high priest. At the same time the University of Florence, with conspicuous success, resumed the teaching of Greek, which had been unknown in the West for 700 years. Thus Cosimo was one of the mainsprings of Humanism.

[JamesBond007]

Nope, all French Royalty after the Merovingians were imposter puppets of Rome and the pope. All British royalty after the Pendragons were middle class merchant puppet imposters. The real Royalty of Europe are the bloodline of Jesus Christ.

As elven Draco Sentien vampire pendragon (I'm not a homosapien but a humanoid) I am the true nobility of Europe and the world. 20 is not even a good distance broham :

Young Merovingian Noble

mtDNA Haplogroup: H65a
Y-DNA Haplogroup: R1b1a2a1a1c2b2b

Genetic Distance: 4.7311
Sample Match! 98% closer than other users

[Epirus DNA]

I am the true nobility of Europe and the world.

I'd like to put the worlds nobility to the sword.

[JamesBond007]

I'd like to put the worlds nobility to the sword.

You are not the first one. The elven pendragons of Britain and elven Merovingians of France have suffered a thousand year elven holocaust (much greater than the Jewish holocaust) that started with donation of Constatine and the church of Rome. That is exactly why all royalty and nobility, of France, after the Merovingians were fake nobility and puppets of Rome/pope.

[Epirus DNA]

You are not the first one. The elven pendragons of Britain and elven Merovingians of France have suffered a thousand year elven holocaust (much greater than the Jewish holocaust) that started with donation of Constatine and the church of Rome. That is exactly why all royalty and nobility, of France, after the Merovingians were fake nobility and puppets of Rome/pope.

Holocaust is a Greek word that means “sacrifice by fire”

[JamesBond007]

Holocaust is a Greek word that means “sacrifice by fire”

"...This is not elitism. For centuries the ancestors of today's would-be Witches, magicians and New-Age gurus raped, tortured, burned and hanged the Elven people. Now they take their names, their titles and their culture and use it to enhance their own social kudos, when they cannot even prove that they are of the Dragon blood." -- Prince Nicholas De Vere Von Drakenberg

[PaleoEuropean]

Holocaust is a Greek word that means “sacrifice by fire”

Don't language flex on me dog

[JamesBond007]

I'd like to put the worlds nobility to the sword.

The Thousan-Year Elven Holocaust :


The Thousand-Year Elven Holocaust





The study of history is as much the study of etymology as it is the study and interpretation of actual events. Both are often a daunting task. Ultimately history is always written by the victors and the meaning of language and the significance of historical events are invariably decided by those whose hands have taken a firm hold of the tiller that steers society's ship.



The word “Fairy”, as we have come to understand from our educators (or deceivers), suggests one of a variety of mythic or imaginary beings whose shape, size, habitat and customs differ according to geography and ethnic or aboriginal folk tradition. Lately, a Fairy has also come to mean a homosexual.



A real Fairy, would not care at all about anyone's sexual orientation, and would just think, “it's all bread and bread after all”. The latter definition would be no doubt dismissed entirely, and s/he would nevertheless take extreme exception to the former definition for the following reason. Apart from the Jews, no race in history has suffered more brutality and racial prejudice than the Elves.



For over a thousand years the Church initiated a consistent policy of genocide that was and still is unrivalled in human history in terms of its relentlessness, violence and hatred. The word genocide is used with justification. In 1944 Raphael Lemkin formulated the term to define “an attempt at the destruction of the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed at individuals, not in their individual capacity but as members of a national group”.

The United Nations elaborates by saying that genocide includes “the systematic moral debasement of a group, people or nation”. The Jews have suffered just this, except in one particular respect. If you were asked your race or nationality today and you replied “Jewish” no one would think twice about it.



Imagine, however, asking Mr. Green or Miss Leibowitz what race they were and they replied “Jewish”. What would be the reaction if you then burst into fits of laughter and replied “Don't be stupid. Jews don't exist, they're just a myth”? Isn't that what genocide or ethnic cleansing is all about—eradicating all trace of a culture from the human consciousness? This is what has happened to the Fairy Race.



Certainly the Germans tried it with the Jews, and if they had been given the same amount of time the Church has had to achieve what they have achieved, no doubt in a thousand years from now the Jews would have also become a myth. But this has already happened to the Fairies. Little trace of their culture or identity exists outside a handful of the old families or beyond the covers of sanitised storybooks for children, or tomes on rustic folk tradition, in which hints of the old lore still remain hidden.



Mr. Green and Miss Leibowitz can go about their business in relative freedom, and can be openly proud of their nationality and cultural heritage. For a thousand years, the Fairies have had to conceal their identities and live in hiding for fear of being torn to shreds or burnt alive. For a thousand years it has been a crime to be of the Elven race. You may be surprised to learn that it still is.



Today, whilst the Jews, by the Grace of God, enjoy the acceptance of their race won through the backlash of public opinion against the Nazi Holocaust, the Thousand-Year Elven Holocaust has been forgotten. Still the Fairies have to remain in hiding contemporarily for fear of ridicule and ostracism.



In 1736 the Witchcraft Act was repealed. However, it was replaced by the Fraudulent Mediums’ Act which is still in force and simply says in one way what the Witchcraft Act said in another.



According to Christian doctrine no one can contact departed spirits. If this is admitted, then inevitably all mediums are fraudulent because the English language defines a medium as being a person who has commerce with the souls of the dead.



By Dragon definition a Witch, meaning a Fairy, is a Medium and the law wouldn't lay a fine distinction upon exactly what the Witch mediates with or how, if they decided they wanted to win an argument. It will be noticed at this juncture that by definition, in their prayers to—and visions of—Christ, the Virgin Mary and the departed Saints, all those who currently call themselves Christians are in fact indulging in mediumship. This is the very act which the Church says is impossible and by which edict they render their entire following heretical. This has always been the case and during the Witch craze, all things considered, it was actually the heretics who were burning the orthodox Christians.



If the Witch mediates with ancestors, she claims to be able to contact the dead. As the Church says this is impossible, the Witch is a fraud and is breaking the law. Ergo to be, or claim to be a Witch, and consequently a Fairy, on that count alone, is illegal. The Witchcraft laws are alive and well and living in a statute book near you. Further by implication, it is possible for a Fairy to be tried under the treason act as well, on two counts.



Firstly Her Majesty the Queen is a Christian and head of the Church of England. No Fairy aware of his or her history and the atrocities committed against their people could ever be what is contemporarily thought of as an orthodox Christian. In this sense they run the risk of committing an act of Treason by denying the Christian faith, because in doing so, like others following different paths, they refute and insult the faith of Her Majesty.



Secondly, the Fairy families stood in absolute opposition to the Donation of Constantine, this being the document that was used to usurp them and initiate the Elven Holocaust itself in the first place.



The Donation of Constantine

The Donation of Constantine first appeared during the 8th century and was a document which purported to recognise the Roman popes as Christ's representatives on Earth and to donate to Pope Sylvester and the Roman Church all those Imperial powers formerly invested in the Throne of Byzantium.



The Donation, the Church claimed, was written in the 4th century at the insistence of the Emperor Constantine. The Church said that he was so grateful for having been cured of leprosy by Pope Sylvester that he gave into the Church's hand the entire power and wealth of the unified Roman Empire, including the right to crown and dethrone kings. Now that is what you call expensive medical insurance.



Supposedly written before 337 AD—the year of Constantine's death—the Donation of Constantine actually didn't make an appearance on the stage of European history until four hundred years later. So far-reaching are the powers bestowed upon the Church by this document, one would have thought that it would have been made public at the time of its bestowal. Not centuries later.



The provisions of the Donation were enforced in 751 AD. The Merovingians were shortly thereafter deposed by the Church and replaced by their sycophants, the Mayors of the Palace, who later became known as the Carolingians. The Church had made a compact with the Mayors and offered to “recognise” their legitimacy as rulers if they would dispense with the true Dragon Kings. The deal was done and the Carolingians were made the puppet rulers under the Roman Church.

The Donation, because it was made by a Dragon King, Constantine, legitimised the Church's right to take this action. To all intents and purposes they had the authority of Dragon Kingship given up to them by this Charter. No doubt the Merovingians knew this to be a fraud, which is why they refused to recognise the authority of the Church to meddle in affairs of state. What do we learn from this?



We can see from the Church's choice of “benefactor” that the Church was well aware that universally, only those of the Dragon Blood would be recognised as true kings. Therefore they chose Constantine as he was known to have been descended from both the Britannic PenDragon House and the Dragon House of David. Furthermore he was a member of the desposyni— the heirs of the Lord—the blood descendants and legitimate representatives of Jesus Christ. In the Donation it appeared as if Constantine had relinquished his hereditary spiritual position as a Messiah and invested it in the Papacy.



By suggesting they were the representatives of Christ, the popes were claiming Dragon descent for themselves. It was well known that Jesus had descendants and that they were part of the only Eurasian dynasty which was authorised to be kings—the Elven Overlords or Dragons. It would have appeared to the public then, that in the displacement of the Merovingians, one Dragon dynasty was being replaced by another, albeit a paper one.



This reduced any danger of mass unrest. As time passed however, it became uncomfortably clear that the function of kingship under the Merovingians had been entirely different to that under the Carolingians. Whilst the Merovingians had formerly assumed the role of overseers, sages and wise counsellors, the Carolingians and their successors, prompted by the Church, became deliberately poorly educated, pig ignorant, insensitive tyrants and territorial tradesmen.



Dragon Kingship and the Grail Code had died to be replaced by a corrupted form of feudal totalitarianism and brutal, economic slavery as the Church carefully and strategically replaced the old dynasties with its own merchant-class client families who, from that day forth, became vassals of the Vatican.



Lastly we learn that from 751 AD the true Dark Age began in earnest. The Elven Holocaust was initiated and would run its course for another thousand years until, in England at least, the Witchcraft laws were repealed in 1736. North of the border in Scotland, however, the persecution of Witches in the 1700's was at its fiercest until the end of the century.



During this time, history has witnessed the rise of the Church of Rome and its successful struggle for power. In time no dynasty ruled in Europe or remained in power unless the Church sanctioned their reign. The Church chose the royal families, it crowned kings and deposed its detractors. In short, the Church, under the auspices of the Donation of Constantine was the sole and supreme temporal power in Europe and the known world. Without this purported imperial benefice however, the Church would have remained a marginalized Mediterranean cult contesting for patronage along with a host of other gnostic Christian denominations.



The royal dynasties, sponsored by the Church and crowned by its Divine Right, instituted their courts and parliaments, passed laws and employed agents to act on their behalf. To all intents and purposes it seemed as if the Church had the absolute right of Dragons and wielded power by the very sanction of Jesus Christ and God.



No monarch reigning today and no government under the monarch or instituted in their name would enjoy their position if the Church, empowered by the Donation, had not given them permission to rule in the first place. Without the Donation of Constantine, European history today would be totally different and none of the dynasties past or present would have had the right to have reigned. Nor would they reign now and none of their governments or agencies would have exercised power.



One slight problem, though. The Donation of Constantine is a complete and utter fraud and the Church was never given any temporal powers at all, let alone the right to found dynasties, crown kings or institute governments. The whole document was a lie from beginning to end and has been known to be a fake since Lorenzo Valla applied the methods of historical criticism to it during the Renaissance.



How do we know Valla was correct? The New Testament references incorporated into the wording of the Donation were taken from the Latin Vulgate version of the Bible. The Vulgate Bible was compiled by St. Jerome, who was born more than two decades after Constantine was supposed to have signed the Donation. The actual Vulgate Bible wording that appears in the Donation didn't exist until St. Jerome invented it, fifty years after the document had supposedly been dated and signed by the Emperor. By this time Constantine had been dead for decades and couldn't have signed the Dragons’ rights away anyway.



The language of the Donation is eighth-century clerical or dog Latin, whilst the Latin used in the 4th century Empire was late classical Roman. The Imperial and Papal ceremonials described in the Donation didn't exist in Constantine's time but were developed some centuries later.



Several documentary instances of the Church's use of the Donation to assert their authority in the medieval period still exist, including the letter of Pope Gregory IX entitled Si Memoriam Beneficiorum, dated October 23rd 1236 and addressed to the Emperor Frederick II. Pope Gregory writes,

“...that as the Vicar of the Prince of Apostles (the Roman Pope) governed the

empire of priesthood and of souls in the whole world, so he should also reign

over things and bodies throughout the whole world; and considering that, he

should rule over earthly matters by the reins of justice to whom—as it is

known—God had committed on earth the charge over spiritual things. The

Emperor Constantine humbled himself by his own vow and handed over the

empire to the perpetual care of the Roman Pontiff with the Imperial Insignia

and sceptres and the City and Duchy of Rome...”.

People in the medieval and Renaissance period, confronted with this document, did not generally criticise the Donation on the grounds of its veracity. They just exclaimed aghast that they could not believe that Constantine would have been stupid enough to have given the Roman Church everything.



From the Donation we understand that Constantine offered the Pope all the robes and Crowns of office but the Pope, being such a humble man, gave them back to the Emperor. This lets the Church off the hook should some malcontent turn up and ask for sartorial evidence. If the readers peruse the Donation for themselves they will be appalled at the pretentious egotism, arrogance and sheer material greed of the Church, as authors of the document.



The fraudulent imperial power of the Vatican to create kings by “coronation”—derived from this faked 8th century Donation of Constantine—was later adopted by the Archbishops of the Church of England with the complicity of the Tudors, who were Catholics themselves.



When he split with Rome, Henry VIII still retained and later ratified and re-established in the Anglo-Catholic Church of England the fraudulent right of the Church's clergy to create by coronation, a succession of British monarchs. This was an illegal act. The Donation of Constantine was proved to be a completely fake document. Therefore no Royal Elven House that knew its origins and cared about social justice could possibly bring itself to recognise a Christian British monarchy or any of their Church sponsored, Church crowned predecessors or any of their regnant or formerly regnant, European cousin Houses.



Because the Donation was a fraud and no subsequent priest of any Catholic derived denomination ever had the right to crown kings, Britain has had no legally reigning monarch for 900 years. As a consequence of this, all the laws passed by these monarchs were and are illegal and worthless and all the governmental agencies set up by or derived from these monarchs or their laws are also illegal and worthless up to the present day.



When considering this, the reader might like to consider the fact that all the arrests ever made by the police in Britain and Europe are acts of kidnap and habeus corpus. Equally, any man who has taken up arms for the Crown and killed for his country is unprotected by law and guilty therefore of murder.



However, paradoxically, as the entire British legal system is illegal, there are no laws, and so the crimes of habeus corpus and murder as we define them today, simply do not exist. Subconsciously, people know that their politicians and monarchs have no legitimate authority to rule over them. They manifest this knowledge in an increasing disrespect for these optional, arbitrary and illusory social conventions, which is yet another reason why social order is breaking down.



If the UN is right, we may face chaos in the near future—and all because of a stupid fraud, perpetrated by a group of myopically greedy, maniacal peddlers of false religion who are now long dead.



Again, for asserting this kind of view the Fairies are implicitly guilty of Treason, even though all British laws are constitutionally illegal and the act of treason itself is a non sequitur. Think of the implications of this.



It applies to any nation state in the Christian world today is still a monarchy or which has evolved as part of a successive, developing political process originating from a monarchy, by virtue of its continuing sanction from, or sponsorship by, the Church of whatever denomination. It is unauthorised by any temporal or divine power to coerce anyone to obey any law originating at any stage of that government's evolution.



In effect Britain, Europe and America are ruled by the sword, and that sword is being wielded by people who are no more than short sighted, selfseeking robber barons. They have no constitutional right to rule even in America, where in the 19th century the libertarian commentator, Lysander Spooner, demonstrated that the consensual nature of the original document, upon which the subsequent, consecutive clauses are founded, was being flouted, thereby making the entire Constitution illegal. Pierre Proud'hon called them all “Tyrants and Usurpers”. Next time you are tempted to eulogise Western Democracy, bite your tongue and let your brain select first gear before you open your mouth. Flawed or otherwise, the idea that the English speaking world has any democracy at all is a joke.



At the beginning of this work the author stated that the people have been conned enough. He now hopes that the readers might appreciate for themselves the precise extent to which the people have actually been deceived. They have accepted a state of affairs where they and their ancestors have been enslaved by a chameleon-like corporate body that has destroyed their creativity and robbed them of their psychological liberty and freedom of conscience for over a thousand years.



The entire moral basis of our society is founded upon a massive historical lie which has twisted the minds of generations of individuals until they have become terrified of the natural drives of their own bodies and souls.



The resultant taboos that have been created have been used to divide the minds of the people and make them dependant on the Church-State for solutions to the problems of resisting Satan and fighting temptation and sin when these contrived, nonsensical whimsies never existed in the first place.



As a result, western Christian society was turned into an open air lunatic asylum packed full of lost souls who weren't lost at all and had no need of a cure for diseases of the soul that they weren't actually suffering from in the first place.

The Church created the confusion and the division and then offered the solution. In fear, the population invested its trust in the perfidious Church and in return for their confidence the Church turned the people into slaves and an entire civilisation into a manufacturing plant to service their own greed for luxury and power.



For a thousand years the Fairies have remained silent about their identities—formerly for fear of their lives—latterly for fear of becoming social outcasts and objects of mirth and derision. Still however, a shadow of menace lies over the ancient families. Greed will go to any length to ensure the continuity of its satisfaction and the same motives that prompted the Church to murder and lie in the past, still prompt their merchant-class puppets to kill and deceive today.



Whilst people therefore now understand the Fairy to be either a gossamer winged sprite or an effeminate male, both are considered harmless jokes. Such a contemporary opinion flies in the face of the facts where the Fairy of history is concerned.



In studying the Fairy in the context of both Celtic and medieval history it must be remembered that the tribes to whom the Victorians ascribed the appellation “Celtic” were not a homogenous or integrated racial group and the Celts themselves never saw themselves as a cohesive, pan-European nation of peoples. Furthermore, like their medieval descendants, they had, within an indistinct collection of tribes, a patriarchal, misogynistic culture, which stands in complete opposition to the popular view that the matriarchal “Celts” promoted a policy of sexual equality. (M. Green: Celtic World)



The modern myth concerning the Celts, promoted by “New Age” racketeers who are rehashing earlier popular trends, tends to set these rather ordinary people into some kind of “Golden Era” of cultural expression and heroism, punctuated by the achievement of a state of high spiritual awareness. In fact, they were average, workaday farming folk who treated their women like dirt.



Nymphs and Shepherds... Go Away!

The Georgians and Victorians, for socio-political propaganda purposes, had various revivals and retrospectives. These were intended to celebrate the merchant-class era of industrial prosperity and the British Imperial oppression and destruction of the cultures of other peoples, by having the audacity to equate such dubious ventures with various “Golden Ages” of the past (paraphrasing Sir Ernst Gombrich).



Principally it was these individuals who patronised the artistic movements whose Svengalis, seeing that the parvenus were only too willing to advance and buy the lie, produced the kind of sentimental, heroic nonsense that plugged the gap in the nostalgia market. This was created by the desire of the newly rich to feel that they were justified by history in the exploitation of the poor in the mills and the mines. They wished to equate their “victories” in the marketplaces with those of the “warrior king” or “noble savage” on the battlefields of classical antiquity. By sponsoring flamboyant painters, they felt they could become identified with the highest artistic and cultural achievements of the various ages whose elan flattered these imperialists' and industrialists' egotism. In this way, they furthered their exploitative, propagandist aims.



However, in Newtonian terms, where every action engenders an equal and opposite reaction, the patronage afforded these artists and sculptors, by magnates whose cultural tastes only ran to jingoism or sentimentality, led to a calamitous pass where artistic standards plummeted.



In the words of the art historian Sir Ernst Gombrich, “There is no such thing as ‘Art’......there are only artists”. And by God: By their fruits ye shall know them well enough.



Culturally vacuous steel barons and cotton magnates would often display framed family charts—tracing the kinds of instant, purchased ancestry purchased by an ancestor—that any genuine self respecting nobleman would shun outright. Their “miladies” would hold soirees, for the local cognoscenti and well-to-do, where the cultural a la carte invariably offered copious helpings of moronic, Byronic neo-classical claptrap garnished lavishly with choruses of criminally insane, musical atrocities like “Nymphs and shepherds come away”, sung by fat falsetto aunts who hadn't a clue what Nymphs were, customarily renowned for getting up to when they actually did “come away” with or without the rustic parties of the second part. And these arachnid recreational activities were namely: Cannibalism (“fancy another helping of Shepherd's Pie, Myrtle?”) and—as their name unavoidably suggests—Nymphomania; which found the outworking of the expression of its inner, emotive rage and lust to be manifest in such acts as oral sex, buggery, simultaneous multiple penetration and bestiality; with a wide variety of domestic livestock, and an equally varied selection of naturally occurring regional fauna—including wolves, dogs, donkeys, wild goats, rams, horses, snakes and—purely for betting purposes—ferrets.



Such sexually epicurean piquancies were practiced with gay abandon alongside rampant homosexuality (amongst the shepherds who'd managed to survive lunch), Sapphism, drug abuse, alcoholic debauchery, Travel Scrabble, and a range of other delightfully civilised, lubricious distractions. (Riley-Scott: Phallic Worship)



At that time, the true nature of Celtic culture was censored, sanitised and idealised so much that the view we have had of it up until recently reflected more our predecessors’ confusion, chauvinism and wishful thinking concerning the period than it did the reality of the era they lauded.



Modern archaeology coupled with a realistic interpretation of the information, less coloured by the concern for moral rectitude, has uncovered a picture of “Celtic” society that is clearer than it was in our grandparents’ day. Indeed with the wealth of new knowledge we find it difficult to apply so liberally the generic term “Celt” in the same way our forebears were wont to do. Scholarship concerning what previously we might have thought of as the “heroic era” of Celtic civilisation, conveyed in modern popular works that owe much of their sentimentality to the erroneous and prim historical view of yesteryear, is garbled and confused.

The images of the noble Celt: the tall blonde warrior chieftain, or the flaxen-haired Swan Maidens of Lyr are not Celtic at all. We still seem to think of all Celts in that way because we are sold the image by people who, in accepting as fact the Victorian delusion, think that this distinct caste was representative of the Celts as a whole. In fact, they represented a tiny minority of individuals who were foreign to and essentially divorced in racial and cultural terms from the people we now know were the real Celts living in that era.



When we look at the stories contained in the Annals of Irish History, the Irish Book of Invasions or the Welsh Mabinogian, we are inclined to think that these documents were about the Celts. They were actually about a strange race of foreigners who reigned alongside these dark-haired, swarthy, stocky little farmers for nearly two thousand years. From these stories we obtained our idea of what the “Celts” were like when, in fact, they weren't Celts at all. They were Scythians, the Elves, the Fairies, the Aryans.



These Scythians were a tightly knit, insular group who practiced Phoenician and Pharaonic marriage customs to keep the blood pure and in all other respects they tended to remain detached from the common swell of humanity. Differing greatly from the customs of the patriarchal Celtic peoples they reigned over, theirs was a society that appreciated the position and power of its women and correspondingly favoured the idea of matrilinear descent.



The Scythians came to reign across Eurasia and normally we find them attached to various indigenous populations, but occasionally they were an indigenous population in themselves, such as the Danaan of Eire and the Ainu of Hokkaido. Unlike their Celtic clients, whose caste system, based on kinship, was male-dominated and hierarchical, the Scythian caste system, which operated amongst their own people, was egalitarian.



Though individuals’ functions and tasks varied, all nevertheless were royal and therefore equal. Proof of this is to be found in the Brehon Law concerning inheritance. This social structure became superimposed onto the Celtic system and produced the sort of divisions we find in Hinduism where the people are separated into three distinct classes:



Brahmins or Priests Ksatriyas or Warriors Sudras or Smiths



Beneath these are settled the untouchables or slaves.



The Scythian system had the same three divisions but these were arranged on the horizontal plane and did not proffer any superior status in relation to the other castes. If one overlaid the Elven, Scythian system onto that of the Celtic, which is virtually identical with the present Hindu system, we would have the following social configuration:

Gods of Heaven

Gods of Heaven and Earth

Gods of Earth



or



Druidic Royal Ancestors, the transcended ones

Royal Archdruids, Druidesses and PenDragons (Vampires)

War Kings, War Lords, Craftsmen, Metalworkers, etc.

Caucasian footsoldiers and Dravidian “Brownies”

Burgh Chiefs

Men at Arms

Farmers, Tinkers, Traders

Women

Slaves



(Celtic source—Miranda Green, Celtic World, Routledge, London, 1995.)



It will be noticed that, contrary to contemporary misconceptions, Celtic women were in fact just above slaves in terms of their rank and were regularly bought and sold or exchanged by their men for cattle, along with the slaves.



It is not a popular view but sadly—given the contemporary academic discoveries concerning the real nature of Celtic society—it is an accurate one. Although we would love to blame the Church for everything, including the oppressive patriarchy that subdued women, the fact is that the Celts were already treating their women like chattels before the Church reared its ugly head above the blood-stained meniscus line of history.



The conversations or entreaties of love we see recorded in the “Celtic” Sagas between “Celtic” lords and ladies, were in fact the exchanges between Scythian men and women. That which is reported as being the love poetry of the “Celts” was instead the love poetry of the Elves—the Royal Scythians— not that of a brutal farming folk who had neither lords nor ladies.



Who in history, if he had the rare gift of writing, would bother wasting such a talent, do you think, by eulogising the sexual peccadilloes or romantic longings of a bunch of turnip farmers who wouldn't have spoken to women on such equal terms anyway? Romance in any case didn't come into it, the Celtic woman just grinned and bore it.



The art of male wooing and flattery arises when the woman has the freedom to choose to say no. The only women who had that choice then were Scythian Princesses. Because of the mysterious composition of their blood and its consequent magical powers, they had a lot more to offer their Elven menfolk than sexual intercourse, which is all that nondescript Celtic women could hope to have had in their favour.



The beauty and exquisiteness of the magic that a Scythian Princess had to offer could not be taken by force. She had to give it willingly. Otherwise, in the act of coercion, her magic would be tainted and become either useless or poisonous.



Occupying a position higher than the Elven male was Goddess incarnate. Elven men were pleased therefore to treat her with deference and honour and to offer her court in a manner that would secure her voluntary participation in their sacred congress. From this obligation of service to such Earthly Goddesses arose the medieval tradition of Courtly Love which, by no means and under no circumstances, was ever intended to be offered to the female descendants of either Celt, Norman or Saxon.



Today, after hundreds of years of oppression, the female descendants of these poor, downtrodden Celtic and later Anglo-Norman women have managed, during the closing years of the millennium, to wrest from their men the equality that evaded their mothers for centuries. Now they demand to stand on an equal footing with their menfolk but, like their sisterly ancestors, when push comes to shove they have nothing more dynamic or magical to offer than sexual intercourse.



However, the male descendants of the Celts and the later AngloNormans—the examples of manhood living today—have in turn nothing better or more magical to offer their women either, and never have. Therefore, equality between the sexes seems to be quite an equitable and logical arrangement whereby the mediocre do not differentiate between, nor discriminate against, each other's mediocrity on the basis of gender.



Passing on from the politics of sex originating in the caste system, we now return to addressing the system as a whole and notice that the figure above is a generalisation which encapsulates the main divisions between each social level.



As time passed and the population increased, technology developed and diversified and the main castes became sub-divided into classes within classes. At length the castes themselves eventually became overturned and the Warrior Class gained the ascendant, later to be upturned, in the last 1200 years, by the Merchant Class, whom the Hindus call the Sudras.



In the twentieth century we also saw situations where the untouchables became the rulers, as in China and Soviet Russia. Presently we have a situation where the Elven Race, at the bottom of the pile, have become the untouchables, whilst the increasingly and frighteningly acquisitive Peasants and the Merchants are at the top, having wrested their positions from the block-headed Warriors. The end product of this fiasco over the last millennium and a half can be smelled in the air, tasted in the water supply and seen in the eyes of diseased, starving, third world children.



Its results can be heard in the screams of animals gratuitously tortured in experiments aimed at testing the toxicity of vanity products, or of medicines intended to make money for these extortionists whose worthless over-inflated products titillate, save or prolong the lives of a race of peasants.



At its inception, the caste system was not an arbitrary set of divisions or inequalities established through main force by a varying collection of sequential oppressors. It was a reflection of the fact that there were differences in the capabilities and capacities of the different types of human beings alive at the time. Some were ingenious artists, builders and artisans, some were naturally gifted traders and negotiators. Some had been bred to have an overview and some were fearless, heroic soldiers. Each group had its part to play in the functioning of society.



Whilst some peoples—like the Celts—had green fingers and could make carrots grow rose blossoms in Hell, most Scythians could not even grow the equivalent of an infants’ school size tray of mustard and cress. However, the Celts were unable to organise complex societies and depended on the Scythians for foresight, guidance and protection.



Centuries earlier similar arrangements developed in the east where the Aryans and the Dravidians, having been frequently at war with each other, finally came to an amicable social arrangement whereby all parties ultimately benefited. Like the Celts, the Dravidians could get dinner from dust and their expertise and practicality was the backbone of the Aryo-Dravidian symbiotic culture. Such symbiotic relationships are also commonly to be observed amongst different species in the natural world and work brilliantly within what must be admitted is a hierarchical natural order which, nevertheless is not a system of inequality or self conscious elitism, but one of necessity.



From about 1800 BC onwards, with the increase in Eurasian populations, the occurrence of a variety of natural disasters and the diminishing of range territory through foreign conquests, the Scythians and the Aryans were forced to seek more settled lives. However, being mainly predators and rangers, they lacked the skills to make farming work. They needed the Hobbit-like peoples of the Celtic and Dravidian cultures to tend the land and in times that were becoming increasingly more violent, these cultures needed the Aryans and Scythians to protect them.



This tolerance and co-operation continued until the emergence of the warrior lords, literally the middle class of their day. Their elitist, hierarchical governmental structures—based on the right of might—became entrenched in western civilisation as the feudal system during the years of the Roman Church's ascendancy and totalitarianism.



From this point onwards the exploitation of the caste system as an ideal tool for breeding elitism, division and inequality became rife. The Roman Church, comprising mainly sudras and peasants, saw a chance to claw its way to power. Its hierarchy upturned the original caste system by ninety degrees, turning it into a ladder to enable them to climb to what they conceived to be the top of the pile and the easy life.

Only humans would seek to differentiate and assert their superiority based on their position within a social structure that, founded on natural law, was originally intended, in contrast, to be for the benefit of all and to function through co-operation. In their egotism, humans abused a natural and beneficial order to the detriment of all those subscribing to it.



In the 20th and 21st centuries the audacity of usurpation continues when the ignorant middle-classes, shopkeepers and their vapid shopkeeper sons, join groups of white supremists who idolise the image of the blond-haired, blue-eyed Aryan. This particular genotype, the warrior, who also occupied the middle class or caste, seems naturally to appeal to this middle class today. Unaware of the fact that Aryans had red hair and green eyes, they have, as a result of their lack of education and intelligence, elevated the usurping warrior to the status of a true Aryan king. In reality the blond-haired, blue-eyed ideal, so beloved of the Germans and for good reason, was bred, like your average white racist today, to be fundamentally stupid.



A warrior could never have manifest the attributes of Aryan kingship in a million years. Kingship took spirit, wisdom and brains. The blond warrior had none of these qualities, and wasn't bred to have them. In the feudal period the warrior was called a baron. This word stemmed from the earlier Latin word baro, which was in circulation at a time contemporary with the rise of the warrior classes. Baro literally means “thickhead”.



It is typical of the racist working and middle classes that they would pick such a figure to emulate. Aryan means wise king, not dumb blond. The adoration by the German National Socialists of the blonde warrior god-king and the assumption ever since by successive generations that he is an Aryan, must have been heavily influenced by the 13th-century Royal Poet, Snorri Sturleson.



In his Sayings of Har, he defines a corrupted Scandinavian caste system consisting of Jarls, Carls and Thralls. The Jarls, says Snorri, were blonde, the Carls were red-haired and the Thralls were black-haired.



Everywhere else the royal colouring is red and this tradition goes back in the Aryans to Radamanthus, Ariadne and Minos, and through them to Lilith herself. Even Jesus and Magdalene are regularly and invariably portrayed with red hair in the Renaissance masterpieces. A reversal has taken place here where warriors usurped or replaced kings as leaders of the people.



The warriors were hired Caucasians, not bloodline Aryans. The upheaval and resultant inequity and iniquity within the caste system occurred when their society’s War Kings legitimately displaced many Aryan queens and kings in times of trouble. They were never to return to their thrones because the conflicts often carried on for decades.



Sometimes however, having had a taste of power, treacherous and greedy warrior captains decided they would either go it alone or take over permanently by force of arms. Following this, however, an even more stupid class of people managed to trade and poison their way to the top.

And who were they? That's right, the settled warehouse tinkers—the cheating peasants with money who were the ancestors of the upper and middle classes of today.



You might think that they were genuine aristocracy because they have inherited titles like Earl or Duke or Lord. What you wouldn't realise is that they only inherited these titles because their ancestors were traders who had had enough money to buy them from Christian kings who were also elevated peasants. And you wonder why the Earth is in such a state?



When the world is run by tinkers, as it is now, the tinker mentality leads to everything being seen as having a price tag attached to it. Everything then becomes a “marketable commodity” and its significance or importance becomes linked to its “marketing potential”. We have become so used to such values and the buzz words that accompany them that we no longer see the inherent immorality or dangers implied therein. We now have a situation where profiteers calling themselves “doctors” can visit indigenous peoples, take blood samples and patent those individuals' genes.



In effect, it would then be possible for the doctors of the Humano Gene Project to file a complaint in an international court and prosecute those same indigenous populations for the theft of the doctors' patented property. Essentially this is slavery under a different guise, where various ethnic peoples belong to an American Medical Corporation, run by a government-backed elite who are—as Americans—a nation whose leaders have it in their power to destroy the world.



The ancient, egalitarianism of the Scythians’ own social order manifested itself in such concepts as the democratic system of voting for Archdruids and PenDragons. The “family”, comprised of the regional divines and princes, would elect both chief priest and high king—sometimes one and the same person—for priests and kings were interchangeable. In many ways this system was replicated in the Saxon Atheling Pool, where prospective rulers were chosen from the most suitable candidates available. (Richard Dufton)



This royal reserve, from whence were chosen kings from a race of kings, also extended itself to mediate in matters of marriage. Where election to high-priest or priestesshood and kingship were concerned, only the very best and most qualified would be picked. In the case of a king he had to be without physical or spiritual blemish. The successful candidate was the most spiritually powerful, learned, and showed the most gracious of manners. (Annals of Irish History)



Such criteria were also applied when princesses or princes were selected for marriage to each other. These were arranged by the Druids between the very best families within the various tuadhes in the kingdoms. This ensured that the fruit of any such royal union would represent an enhancement of all the most admired and required attributes necessary for a royal dynasty, thus

reinforcing the perfection of the royal race itself. Both Hindu and medieval marriage customs were derived from this Scythian practice. (Hall)



For the Scythians the ability to perform magic—to manifest the Sidhe— was innate and hereditary in very much the same way as we view other skills as being today, such as Fine Art, for instance. Selective unions gave the race the opportunity to breed outstanding magicians whose gifts of natural perception and understanding, and whose ability to access the “Otherworld”, helped to produce and guide brilliant kings who reigned with elegant aplomb. The ability to perform magic was carried in the blood and if that blood became watered down by marriages entered into with outsiders, the genetic strain was weakened and so was the ability to perform magic.



The Aryan-Scythians were not colour-prejudiced. Even though they were white themselves, they did not marry other whites. The purity of the Elven blood was absolutely necessary in order to enable the Dragon Kings and Queens to maintain their magical abilities and the quality and depth of their perception. The Elves were relied upon by their client races to be able to see things and perform feats that these client races couldn't. In this way they could fulfil their obligatory roles as the Seers and Guides that their clients had required them for in the first place.



These clients acknowledged that they were naturally unable to have an overview or to perform higher magic. Therefore it was not in their best interest to allow the Elves to dilute the Elven blood by intermarriage with members of that client race. This wasn't racism but a mutually acknowledged understanding that the Elves were originally of an entirely different subspecies, rather than just being of a different race.



This separatist custom was still vigorously upheld by the British rural working classes up until the first half of the 20th century when they themselves still considered intermarriage between the castes to be an outrage and a danger to social order. Although something of a misguided view, given the arriviste backgrounds of most of the contemporary aristocracy, it is a clear example of the way in which custom, however inappropriately applied, arises from ancient racial memory.



If a white person refused to mate with black people, you might be tempted to call the individual a racist. However, if anyone of any colour refused to mate with other primates, you would not for one moment think of accusing them of racism, whatever their colour, as the other primates are of a different species. The Holy Bible refers to the sons of Samael as goats and the sons of Jehovah as sheep. Here then we have a classical acknowledgement that it was understood from ancient times that there was in fact a difference between Elves and Men.



According to Genesis of the Grail Kings by Laurence Gardner and Nicholas de Vere (Introduction), this difference is also recorded in the Sumerian cylinder rolls from whence the biblical material was extracted. These same cylinder rolls record the assertion that the Elves made man by a series of processes that resulted in the Elves being only a quarter related to man at the time.



It is known that in antiquity the Nephilim, the Elven sons of the Anunnagi interbred with human women who were the result of this experiment and who in their turn produced the Naphidim. However it is recorded that these halfbreeds were destroyed long before the Black Sea Flood, and the slate was wiped clean.



The next experiment produced a lineage of pure-bred Elven queens and kings who were to supervise a race of quarter breeds who were originally created for manual labour. The quarter breeds, nevertheless, were eventually to gain their freedom and elect their own chieftains. They were helped by the Elven dynasty, the people whom Christians now think of as the spawn of Satan. This kind of attitude goes a long way in determining exactly what the Church feels about human emancipation.



These people interbred with anyone and we know them now as the biblical race of Adam whose Elven blood today is so diluted as to be infinitesimal. The pure Elven Queens and Kings however bred with no one but themselves and so throughout the past five or six millennia, the blood was kept more or less pure in several unbroken lines of descent until as late as the

8th century AD. From that time however, only one bloodline descent is recorded as being pure and unbroken. Only that one single named dynasty driving from an historical Elven Royal House contemporarily described as such, still exists today.



As human blood diluted however, the need for Elven Overlords increased, and from the second millennium BC the Scythians, as they came to be known, were in great demand as Queens and Kings, Seers and Magi. This continued up until about 751 AD, when the Elven Holocaust began in earnest. From 500 BC onward, during the decline of the increasingly insular Elven population in Europe, it was not the case that they, at that time, were “higher” than the other species as they had been previously. They were simply different from them.



In a world that was becoming increasingly more structured, the Elves needed man as much as man needed the Elves. One should understand that during the various later periods in history when these social arrangements were entered into, they were seen as being complementary. Not competitive or hierarchical.



Such separatism then was born of pragmatism and necessity. In those days it was known that hormonal levels were influenced by genetic inheritance and that hormones affected the individual's perceptions, psychological indivi-Dualism and the subsequent ability to transcend and perceive the intricacies of the workings of the cosmos. Elven blood was rich in these substances.



Maintaining the purity of the blood therefore was of paramount importance. Intermarriage between the Scythian reigning houses and members of the Celtic, or any other race, was strictly forbidden and greatly lamented if it did occur. However on occasion we read in folktales or histories the stories of the mutual theft of brides from each camp by both Celtic chieftains and Scythian kings.



Many of these stories are suspect and were written during the period of the Roman Church's ascendancy. The motive for these stories was to propagate the myth that the Fairy blood was being watered down. The Church, by spreading this rumour, hoped to persuade the peasants that their traditional friends and protectors, the Elven Queens and Kings, were losing their power along with the purity of their blood and were thereby becoming ineffectual and thus redundant.



If the people could be convinced of this, then they would believe that the age of magic was dying and invest their support in the Church instead. A clever lie. In most instances, if not all, these so-called Celtic chieftains were not, in fact, “Celtic” at all but Milesian Scythians. Such misrepresentations occur throughout the monkish reworkings of Gaelic history. An apt example of this is in the Christianised story of Lugh and the Queen of Sovereignty in which Lugh admits to having once being a mortal king. This is untrue.



Sometimes we too read the stories of the love between Fairies and humans, representing the marriages between Scythians and indigenous families. In later times, far more unpleasant tales emerged concerning the decline of the Elven families who had had to go into hiding from, the Church fathers said, the Celtic Milesians.



At this point, in Eire, the Danaan became the Daouine Sidhe, the people of the hills. This would have occurred from about 500 BC onwards. This didn't actually happen with the ubiquity, rapidity or finality that the Church reports. Scythian princes and princesses of the Tuadha d'Anu or Danaan were still at large, up until the Battle of Clontarf. Why did the Church bother with the weak blood yarn if they had all been wiped out, unless they were adopting a double safeguard policy?



If anyone drove the Elves into hiding and instigated their “final” (?) decay it was not the Milesians, but the Church itself. From this period in time arose the tale of the Fairy changeling. It is asserted that after waves of invasions and the decline in Fairy numbers following wars with people such as the Milesians, though now living in virtual isolation in the forests, the Fairies still maintained their taboos concerning marriage between the races.



The result of this, said the Church chroniclers, was continuous in-breeding resulting in deformed and sickly offspring. When an enclave of Elves had become so inbred, they reported, it was often their custom to steal local children and raise them for breeding purposes in order to inject some fresh DNA into the Fairy gene pool. However, that, apparently, was not the only reason for such thefts, it was intimated darkly.



As has already been pointed out, the Fairies practiced Phoenician and Pharaonic marriage. The former is the union of father and daughter, which in the horse-breeding world is acclaimed for producing the finest, healthiest thoroughbreds. The second is union between brother and sister, an arrangement that, according to geneticists at Cambridge University, can continue for up to three hundred years—ten generations—before any genetic problems are made apparent. As they didn't suffer from the moral stupidity encouraged by the Church, they had ample scope to vary the types of alliances they made in-caste, and thereby prevent hereditary problems from occurring too often.



However, leaving that to one side, allow for the probability that at least a thousand Elves survived the various calamities reported to have befallen them, prior to and following the first millennium AD. If those thousand Elves came perhaps from six loosely related clans, you have at least six varying gene pools from which to choose partners, before resorting to intense incest in any case.



From the time of the Milesian victory and the flight of the Fairies into the hills in 500 BC, and the emergence of these Church sponsored stories of child kidnap and incestuous deformity, there must have lapsed about a thousand years. This form of ecclesiastical propaganda began in earnest after 751 AD.



The Milesians and the Danaan had settled their differences some time before and were interbreeding. They were both Scythian Tribes, and the occurrence of deformity and the consequent necessity to steal peasant children to breed from, as the Church hinted, was negligible. In the context of accusations of wilful and unnecessary perversity, where the Church accused the Elves of stealing human children to eat, this is misinformation.



Nevertheless, during times of hardship, such as the medieval period, when disease and death were rife, necessity sometimes forced human communities to resort to cannibalism simply in order to survive. Instances of peasants being driven by circumstance to eat the flesh of condemned criminals are unequivocally recorded.



The Elves did maintain the cult of the sacrificial king amongst their own adult population, but the stealing of human children for these ritual purposes never occurred because they were of a different race. Nevertheless, here we have an example of the kind of ecclesiastical deception that, in order to further brainwash simple folk whom it had already conditioned by deception and terror to be gullible, priests would use the idea of evil beings preying on children. During any period of history it seems that the “send five dollars and we'll stop this man from shooting the puppy” approach to such a concept is always guaranteed to elicit a highly-charged, emotional response from a poorly culturally developed and badly educated public. In sheer terror they would typically close ranks, toe the party line and reaffirm their loyalty to the establishment and its easily digested morality.



And what was the purpose of this kind of scapegoatism? To ratify social identity under a specific ethical, cultural banner and thereby keep the charlatan priesthood in full and gainful employment by using psychological terrorism to ensure that they and their riches continued pouring in.



The fascinating aspect to this kind of propaganda is that today it still works just as insidiously and effectively on people who like to think of themselves as modern, intelligent sophisticates living in an enlightened and educated society, as it did on a medieval population. To all intents and purposes this kind of indoctrination is fascism. Those familiar with the work of George Orwell will remember the scenario he presented in his novel 1984, where a totalitarian regime maintained social cohesion by pitting one social group against another.



Now transpose this entire situation back to the Middle Ages and imagine how it must have felt for the Elves who suffered exactly the same kinds of accusations, abuse and persecution for identical political aims. And now add to that the inevitable institutionalised rape and physical torture, and top the whole lot off with a mandatory death penalty.



The Church had instigated just such a relentless and insidious programme of militant, psychotically hateful propaganda and persecution against the Elves. It was a rabid war of lies that attacked every level of their presumed behaviour and twisted every Fairy custom into an act of abomination ordered by their supposed master Satan himself.



All the efforts of the Elves, the Church bleated, were ranged against the poor peasant. Because of the abominable traditions of these evil and wicked Fairies, who had been the peasant's former friends and protectors, the poor peasant lived in fear for his very life and soul, and could only rely on comforting, forgiving Mother Church for his physical protection and spiritual salvation.



And what little recompense, what mere trifling consideration did the Church expect for so great a favour? Merely that the peasant should:

a) manifest an appropriate amount of gratitude—and an appropriate amount of guilt—for having the audacity to exist on a planet that, in belonging to “their” God, was therefore by association also the property of the Church,

b) be ravaged by the fear of his own natural inclinations which, the priests instilled into him, were dirty and sinful.

c) Lastly that he work a fifteen hour day, six and a half days a week, allowing time off to go to Church, fifty two weeks a year.



Furthermore, much of what little he had he paid in tithes, taxes and portable goods to the priesthood who, though peasants themselves, were in fact making the peasants' life more unbearable than any Fairy could. If Jesus could have seen the atrocities and social injustices that these blood-soaked carrion were perpetrating in his name, he would have turned in his grave.



The Scythians didn't prey on peasants, merchants, human nobility or socalled “royalty” for reasons intimated previously: namely that in comparison, those not of the Fairy race had dead blood trickling through their veins.



In their heyday the Fairies practised familial vampirism. In tandem, this, with their tradition of living with the remains of their ancestors in tomb or temple Raths, established the folk tradition which tells that the Vampires returned from the dead—rose from the tombs—to feed from the blood and life force of their living relatives.



During the Medieval and Reformation Periods this tradition was gleefully expanded upon and misreported by both the Roman and Protestant Churches, who are both Catholic, and equally to blame for what has gone wrong. They gave the erroneous impression that Vampires, or indeed werewolves, could occur in any family, peasant, merchant or otherwise, and that those families therefore were constantly in danger from their own departed.



What kind of twisted mind would think up such a story and, not content to turn the living against the living, brother against sister and husband against wife, would also turn the living against their own ancestors? This is deliberate alienation and disenfranchisement on a grand scale.



On the death of a relative, life was sad enough. If the person was a breadwinner, life was precarious and uncertain enough in those days without having some parasite propagating the kind of story that invested tragedy and grief with menace. As one mourned someone once so dearly loved in life, in death they were then to become an object of loathing and dread.



What we have here is a very disturbing group of people who will say or do anything for power. Even more disturbing is that they are still manipulating the minds of the people in Europe and America with variations of the same nonsense they have always propagated, either themselves or through sympathetic or sycophantic governmental elites. They may have taken a back seat, but they're still in power. Who will rid us of these pestilent priests?



The king tribe, in much the same way as they selected their rulers and Druids, from an “Atheling Pool” of Brehon Families, also selected from this same group a class of females who became known as “Grail Maidens”. These sacred, royal princesses, virgins of High Birth and Pure Blood, at an optimum age would be chosen to act as feeding females.



Giving willingly of their blood, fluids and energy, these girls were not mutilated, sacrificed or murdered during the process, but were worshipped and cherished as incarnations of the nurturing Dragon Goddess. Dea Vulna Gnosis—the Goddess Gives the Blood of Knowledge.



In fact they were perceived as, and treated like, goddesses themselves. Their rank was second only to the High Queens who, on attaining the traditional age, they themselves became. Women today should be so lucky. When fully mature, the Grail Maidens became Dragon Princesses and were encouraged to pick the cream of the princes and warlords for their pleasure.



When contracted into lease marriages with their own kin they became the Dragon Queens and the matriarchs of their people, the mothers of the next generation of Elven Queens and Kings. Such is a far cry from the treatment a Celtic woman might expect to receive, who having but one office open to her and far less physiological capabilities than a Dragon Queen, was treated with less respect than a brood mare. Status quo?



The Fairies, though now thought of as obscure nature spirits, were at the forefront of Eurasian civilisation and included the PenDragons and their cousins the Merovingians. The decline and obscurity of the Fairy race was caused, as we have seen, by the Roman Catholic Church who, unlike the now defunct Celtic Church, were the sworn enemies of the Grail or Fairy blood. The Celtic or Druidic Church was a priestly variant of the Middle Eastern branch of the Grail race, the Dragon Kings. The word “Church” actually derives from “circa” and the old highland euphemism for going to the Kirk was “going to the stones”, meaning stone circle.



The Messiahship, the rulership of the Christian Church was invested in Jesus as the appointed son and rabbi and was intended, like Dragon Kingship, to descend in his bloodline. This it did through the Merovingian kings and the Celtic Church. In Britain, Jesus' granddaughter married the Archdruid Bran the Blessed, cementing a blood alliance between the Dragon and the Grail branches of the one greater royal family, guided and protected by the Druidic Priests of the Celtic Church and the indigenous Druids of Britain.



For reasons outlined in other works, Jesus' other brother James attracted a following consisting of Paul of Tarsus and Peter the Fisherman. This faction settled in Rome with Paul and established itself eventually as the Roman Church under Constantine, which boasted Peter as the First Bishop of the Christian Church. However, as Vatican records show, Prince Linus of Britain was descended from Jesus, and was therefore the First Bishop of the Christian Church following Christ himself.

Nevertheless, since then, the Roman heresy, the Catholic Church of the Dogma and not the Blood, vied for ascendance. After its final victory in 664 AD at the Council of Whitby, it did everything in its power to steal authority and leadership from the rightful bloodline descendants who held it. As part of this process in Europe, agreements were made with the Mayors of the Palaces aforementioned, and the Merovingians were either murdered or incarcerated as the Church established these Mayors, the Carolingians, under them as puppet kings.

After the Dark Ages the Roman Church became a ubiquitous and brutal power which attempted the utter destruction of the true kings. Because of this relentless campaign, as the centuries have progressed we have been left to think of the Fairies as the Church would wish us to think of them, as being anything other than what they really were.



Hard pressed and in decline at this period, many in the outlying regions who could not adjust to the new regime or assimilate themselves into a camouflaged position simply took to the forests during the periods of the Church's worst excesses. In their place and in the places of those the Church murdered, they appointed farmer chieftains and tinkers from the Sudra class of Celtic Society, thus confusing the identities of the Scythians and the Celts. This allowed, in retrospect, a situation where it appears that the Celts trade off the earlier cultural accomplishments of the Fairy race as if they were their own, thereby paving the way for glorious ersatz “Celtic Revivals” in the centuries to come!



So whilst some members of the Fairy race of kings took refuge in deceit, many others took to the forests and lived in the obscurity and insularity of the Greenwood. This reinforced the ancient association between Fairies and the natural world in folk memory.



Such an association finds further reinforcement in the old Druidic laws concerning the reverence due to trees and nature in general which, to the Fairy queens and kings with their transcendent perception, contained life in all its manifestations, a life of which they were the custodians.



In the days of their ascendance the Fairies operated a system of land management. It consisted of nomadic pastoralism and hunting, interspersed by the settled agriculture of their Celtic clientele who tended the farmsteads in rotation. They accompanied their Fairy lords and ladies as they themselves travelled seasonally between a central Sacred seat and three out of four satellite Raths and their burghs or brocks which were arranged in a nomen, or mark of Cain circle-and-cross configuration.



The advantage of this system, which gave rise to the folk tale of the “trooping Fairies”, was that the regional game stock, the vegetation and the soil itself were allowed to recuperate and restore themselves in times allotted as being fallow. For one year in four a whole region would lie fallow. A hangover from this tradition can be seen in the old “Norfolk Strip” style of crop rotation. The difference was that instead of resting strips of land in turn, the Fairies rested whole districts, moving themselves and their clients from settlement to settlement in turn as the year progressed.



The traditional times to move were May Eve, Midsummer, Samhain and the return to the centre was at Yule, revealing a quarturnal rotation when the Fairies could be seen and heard traversing the forests, hills and dales in joyous musical progressions filled with light and laughter. Such tales, surviving the brutality and oppression of the medieval period, came down to us through folk tales until the last century. In Eire and Scotland, they were still common currency amongst the rural communities who were wont to comment, as we have seen, that “if the Elves die, the Land dies too”.



To the Dragon Queens and Kings—the Fairies—were attached numerous epithets, some of which are included here, but are also the subject of another essay, where they are dealt with in detail. -- prince Nicholas De Vere Von Drakenberg

[Epirus DNA]

"...they cannot even prove that they are of the Dragon blood." -- Prince Nicholas De Vere Von Drakenberg

Game of Thrones 2
proof of the Dragon blood