| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 9,098 Given: 4,007 |
Yes :/Originally Posted by IrisSelene
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 3,208 Given: 1,745 |
They have some agenda how they show the result and the samples they choose, but most people that make genetic calculators have agenda or something to prove you know
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 44,378 Given: 31,164 |
I wouldnt recommend giving the Chinese your Dna raw data but too late now I guess.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 9,098 Given: 4,007 |
China or US.. same thing
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 44,378 Given: 31,164 |
They use Eurogenes K15. I think it would be better with K13
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 25,540 Given: 28,978 |
Haven't looked at MTA for a while. My breakdown in detail because it's fairly uncomplicated with basically only Lombards, Saxons, Celts and Vikings.
Inner circle - Longobard 40.5%, Saxon 27%, Celt 32.5%
Early Bronze Age - Celt 78.6%, Longobard 9%, Saxon 8.6%, Vandal 2%, Frank 1%, Scythian 0.4%
Late Bronze Age - Celt 97.2%, Longobard 2.8%
Roman Age - Celt 63.3%, Saxon 3.3%, Vandal 15%, Frank 0.7%, Viking Danish 7.4%, Viking Swedish 5%, Viking Icelandic 3.2%, Longobard 2.1%
Medieval - Celt 17.7%, Saxon 2.7%, Vandal 1.8%, Frank 0.4%, Viking Danish 30.1%, Viking Swedish 20.8%, Viking Icelandic 11.2%, Viking Norwegian 13.7%, Longobard 1.6%
Time periods and populations don't really match but they are just trying to fit what they see in your dna now to time periods when really in the Neolithic the Irish were a very different population than the Irish in the Bronze Age. Anyway there isn't really many Irish genomes at the moment for this to make sense.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 17,901 Given: 18,310 |
lol...now that is saying something
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 3,208 Given: 1,745 |
My close distance is 9... not 0.9 but 9...
Lol
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 44,378 Given: 31,164 |
DySCYplina
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 17,901 Given: 18,310 |
This actually follows the pattern of you being more Celtic than my mom. These are her resultsHaven't looked at MTA for a while. My breakdown in detail because it's fairly uncomplicated with basically only Lombards, Saxons, Celts and Vikings.
Inner circle - Longobard 40.5%, Saxon 27%, Celt 32.5%
Early Bronze Age - Celt 78.6%, Longobard 9%, Saxon 8.6%, Vandal 2%, Frank 1%, Scythian 0.4%
Late Bronze Age - Celt 97.2%, Longobard 2.8%
Roman Age - Celt 63.3%, Saxon 3.3%, Vandal 15%, Frank 0.7%, Viking Danish 7.4%, Viking Swedish 5%, Viking Icelandic 3.2%, Longobard 2.1%
Medieval - Celt 17.7%, Saxon 2.7%, Vandal 1.8%, Frank 0.4%, Viking Danish 30.1%, Viking Swedish 20.8%, Viking Icelandic 11.2%, Viking Norwegian 13.7%, Longobard 1.6%
Time periods and populations don't really match but they are just trying to fit what they see in your dna now to time periods when really in the Neolithic the Irish were a very different population than the Irish in the Bronze Age. Anyway there isn't really many Irish genomes at the moment for this to make sense.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks