Does this polish Alpine girl pass anywhere out of central Europe?

[Viridian1]

Please don't make a fool of yourself. I would suggest reading books instead of online amateurish sources.

Would you agree with alpinised Neo-Danubian?

She's not Alpine. You're posting Baltic looking girls and call them Alpines because you want to whitewash Alpines. I will report you.

he is almighty now, he is a funding member, you can't report him successfully

You both Laag and Sundqvist gonna be reported for plotting against me

[cass]

Would you agree with alpinised Neo-Danubian?

Neo Danubian is C. Conn’s therm. First of all Coon was not regarded as credible academic source in Europe even 80y ago. AFAIK he has never made any local research, especially in E.Europe. His understanding of Czekanowski matrix was obviously wrong and I can provide simple and logic prove. Theory of durability of anthropological features has been rejected. Secular trends in the main anthropological features, including growth, skull dimensions etc. are well described. With all the consequences. Moreover taking into account contemporary genetic knowledge the Danubian theory must be rejected.

[Viridian1]

Neo Danubian is C. Conn’s therm. First of all Coon was not regarded as credible academic source in Europe even 80y ago. AFAIK he has never made any local research, especially in E.Europe. His understanding of Czekanowski matrix was obviously wrong and I can provide simple and logic prove. Theory of durability of anthropological features has been rejected. Secular trends in the main anthropological features, including growth, skull dimensions etc. are well described. With all the consequences. Moreover taking into account contemporary genetic knowledge the Danubian theory must be rejected.

So all those we call Neo-Danubians or Baltids, Czekanowski describes as Subnordid race (Nordid + Lappid)?

[cass]

So all those we call Neo-Danubians or Baltids, Czekanowski describes as Subnordid race (Nordid + Lappid)?

Not really, only partly.
Surowiecki's Słowiańska(1824)= Deniker's Subnordique et Vistuliene= Stołyhwo's fanobrchycephalus= Eickstedt's Osteuropeide= Biasutti's Baltica= Czekanowski's Typ subnordyczny.
Surowiecki's Fińska żółtowłosa= Deniker's Race orientale=Eickstedt's Sibiride=Biasutti's Forme europeidi arcaiche= Czekanowski's Typ paleoeuropeidalny, Typ Paloeazjatycki
Moreover Czekanowski (1911) distinguished Preslavic type (pre - so before the arrival of Slavs) later named Sublaponoid (Czekanowski 1928-61).
I hope that clarifies things.

[Viridian1]

Not really, only partly.
Surowiecki's Słowiańska(1824)= Deniker's Subnordique et Vistuliene= Stołyhwo's fanobrchycephalus= Eickstedt's Osteuropeide= Biasutti's Baltica= Czekanowski's Typ subnordyczny.
Surowiecki's Fińska żółtowłosa= Deniker's Race orientale=Eickstedt's Sibiride=Biasutti's Forme europeidi arcaiche= Czekanowski's Typ paleoeuropeidalny, Typ Paloeazjatycki
Moreover Czekanowski (1911) distinguished Preslavic type (pre - so before the arrival of Slavs) later named Sublaponoid (Czekanowski 1928-61).
I hope that clarifies things.

I am more confused now, but I know what Adam Wanke said so I understand my confusion

[cass]

I am more confused now, but I know what Adam Wanke said so I understand my confusion

Synonyms of different taxonomic models