"North Macedonian"

[Dorian]

Btw klarino means those who get tattoos ,wear faggot clothes ,shave their body etc..not Macedonians you fucking idiots

Other than that when Greeks had wind instruments(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aulos ) ,you paeonian niggas were in caves...

[JohnnyP]

Bla bla

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...=1#post6599557

[-Scar-]

https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qim...381a55f05d1988

Hello to you too

Plotting close to certain population does not necessarily mean that you two are related. A half Irish/half East Asian would end up somewhere in central Asia.
Go check their Y-DNA while you are at it.

[MegaArgus1]

Bravo Jovan.

There's alot more sources then that, proving a Macedonian ethnicity separate to the others. But people turn a blind eye to it, as it does not suit mainstream established historical teachings, which has been skewed over the century in favor of certain people.

Greeks, Bulgarians and Serbs (etc) only have one view on Macedonians, and that is that Macedonians are people with no history or culture, and created by Tito. That is all they know.

The Greeks and others are not asking for proofs. They do not need proofs. They want to believe in what they believe because it is impossible not to believe in what they want to believe. We will continue hearing the same phases like Skopienos and so on for a very long time. The only way we to respond is to ignore them.
.

[Tauromachos]

The Greeks and others are not asking for proofs. They do not need proofs. They want to believe in what they believe because it is impossible not to believe in what they want to believe. We will continue hearing the same phases like Skopienos and so on for a very long time. The only way we to respond is to ignore them.
.

Yeah then why don't you ignore them

[MegaArgus1]

Yeah then why don't you ignore them

Ti is hard to resist your stupidity

[brennus dux gallorum]

Plotting close to certain population does not necessarily mean that you two are related. A half Irish/half East Asian would end up somewhere in central Asia.
Go check their Y-DNA while you are at it.

It does, unless you really think that the 99% R1b northern Cameroonese are related to basques

Of course Ydna shows a small percentage of more recent male ancestors, but autosomal dna shows a deeper (but extremely larger) common ancestry between two populations

Your example is not accurate, as even if the person that you described plotted over south Asia his phenotype and deep ancestry would have nothing to do with the area

A more accurate example would be a half Greek and half English, who would plot with southern French. Yes his recent patternal ancestors would be closer to Irish or Dutch, and his matternal to Italians or Albanians, but in the end his entire deep family tree would be consisted of more common ancestors with southern French than English or Greek separately

[-Scar-]

..................

[-Scar-]

It does, unless you really think that the 99% R1b northern Cameroonese are related to basques

Of course Ydna shows a small percentage of more recent male ancestors, but autosomal dna shows a deeper (but extremely larger) common ancestry between two populations

Your example is not accurate, as even if the person that you described plotted over south Asia his phenotype and deep ancestry would have nothing to do with the area

A more accurate example would be a half Greek and half English, who would plot with southern French. Yes his recent patternal ancestors would be closer to Irish or Dutch, and his matternal to Italians or Albanians, but in the end his entire deep family tree would be consisted of more common ancestors with southern French than English or Greek separately

The subclades of R1b are completely different in Basques compared to Cameroose.

What else you said basicially proved my point about half English half Greek.

[brennus dux gallorum]

The subclades of R1b are completely different in Basques compared to Cameroose.

What else you said basicially proved my point about half English half Greek.

Completely different, but still r1b, which means extremely closer in terms of very, very limited recent male ancestry than with anyone with other haplogroups (I, J etc) or even with R1a.

As for the second, i wouldn't say so, what i am saying is that technically in the end the half English half Greek has a higher percentage of common DEEP ancestors with a southern French than with either English or Greeks, even though his RECENT ancestry is closer to either English or Greek.

My point (or not at all"mine" but what genetics imply) is that ydna shows something very specific: a deep male ancestor, meanwhile autosomal dna shows the rest of your ancestors, so technically your whole racial background. You can be an r1b and at the same time an autosomally 99% African, but never an African because of your A or B or E Ydna when your autosomal Dna has nothing to do with Africa