0
Yes, the Brothers Grimm had put forth their own observations on this matter, but these are usually lacking details for North Germanic peoples. I find it offensive that I have to listen to foreigners decide whether or not the sagas are real and relevant depictions of my ancestors. The books by Tolkien were not real or relevant, but the source materials he used for his works were largely inspired by true stories.
Why do you lot appropriate the name Teutonic, but not Germanic? I guess it is more understanding that Germanic includes other nations, and the Continental Germanic is said to be primarily Teuton in origin. One time, I was at an airport and met a Swabian. I asked him if it bothers Germans that the people of the Netherlands appreciably use the name Dutch for themselves, when they are not associated with the same body politic as the land governed by Berlin. He said it did not bother him at least, but I would be convinced that what separates the land under Amsterdam as being Frisian, and the land under Brussels as obviously Flemish. What other original reason is there in seeing these groups as ethnically separate? Political conventions and economical concerns cannot be all.
Bookmarks