1
Thumbs Up |
Received: 341 Given: 84 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,240 Given: 2,623 |
Be honest, first is too wide / short faced for "pure" Nordic. His face is nearly round.
On the other hand third is Faelid. Nothing Osteuropid in him.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 341 Given: 84 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,240 Given: 2,623 |
Yep but German anthro school has different view of what is Nordic. Even brachycephalic with Nordic facial features was considered as such.
This is why Eickstedt considered most of Silesia as Nordic (except Sudeten) even if it was predominantly brachy region (I speak about pre-war Germans of course).
Thumbs Up |
Received: 11,394 Given: 8,724 |
They concentrated on measurement- mainly on Halstatt findings, yet disregarded the Corded Nordic differences. Metrically the first guy is perfect Halstatt, but still some features are off/ has Osteuropid tendencies. While 3rd one is feauture wise more Nordo-Cm than Osteuropid
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,481 Given: 9,778 |
With the exception of third guy, who looks German (Faelid mainly), all others are typical Poles: a mix of native (pre-Slavic) and Slavic types.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 341 Given: 84 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks