Why does everyone claim Scythians?

[Universe]

@Sean you sound very similar to a former banned South Asian user who was living in the states

I think Fractal was his name

You're not the first one to suggest this but I don't understand why. They sound different. The Indian guy could only talk about how Indian diaspora is superior to other races in USA.

Sean has a more international outlook and is more knowledgeable. He often comments on topics that the Indian guy never touched(eg analyzing wallon vs flemish situation of Belgium in detail in another thread, no indian would do that).
He's obviously an anglo/white guy judging by his posts and interests.

[KirillMazur]

Colonisation in the 1600s only benefited a handful of people while peasants like you in Russia were basically a farm animal for industry. The British Empire was unique in the history of all Empires by birthing new successful nations in the Anglosphere, as well as dramatically improving South Africa, Hong Kong, etc.

Beyond dawn, a sunset will surely come - there is nothing eternal in the world. So your western usurious-parasitic-slave civilization is already rotting. 500 years is a lot, anyway.
Why did you help Japan, but did not help the same capitalist Bangladesh or Congo? On the contrary, why did you make them dumps and colonies for slave labor? So your system does not imply well-being for everyone, but only for 20% at the expense of the wretched existence and overexploitation of 80% of the rest.

Your people on the other hand are basically negro tier in Europe. They literally somehow manage to ruin everything they touch. Look anywhere that's had a Russhit diaspora immigrate, the Baltics, Konigsberg, Moldova, and they've literally turned all those places into shitholes. Worse yet is that despite this Ruskies are so retarded that they even have this autistic mentality where they beat their fists on their chests and think themselves of as heroes, in their eyes everyone else owes them something. Russian entitlement is off the charts when the only thing they really deserve is to be put down like dogs.

Why are you so angry? Russia and the USSR have never plundered or cut down to zero the annexed territories and peoples. On the contrary, we tried to raise their level to our own, even to the detriment of ourselves. While you set a price for every Tasmanian killed and chopped off the hands of slowly working slaves in the Congo. And about the indigenous people of North America and Australia, I generally modestly say nothing. About the murder of Russians "like dogs" - one uncle you led with a funny mustache tried and could not. But you got a fair, albeit delayed in time revenge.
As for the Baltic states and Moldova (and most of Eastern Europe), the Western system annexed them as labor colonies, privatizing all their property - the one who considers this “progress” is simply disabled.

Negroes have absolutely zero to do with why western countries are rich. If they are so awesome, why is Africa such a shithole? And why was it always a shithole, even thousands of years before colonisation happened? Because I know that’s going to be your excuse, that’s all these negroes know how to do blame the us for all their problems. They did it in Africa, they do it in the west. It’s all they know how to do.

Africa does not flourish, because you do not allow it to develop, pumping their resources for free, simultaneously imposing on them individualism and a market that does not work in their society. Typical bourgeois propaganda about - "They themselves are to blame, they do not want to work" and other shit. They simply do not see any reason to work for the western owner; this will not bring them and their country any prosperity. It is logical that they go to you to live at your expense, hating you.

Trust me, you're never convincing anyone here, better stick to posting naked chubby girls all day lel.

The current situation with coronavirus has shown Europeans what a long friendship with you is worth. It will be very strange and suicidal if this pandemic does not teach them anything.

[ixulescu]

They were such an irrelevant people in history. They have no known descendants (apart from Iranic Ossetians but they are from the Alan tribes). Their only success is a few raids. They got destroyed whenever they tried to expand and their only genetic legacy is due to the fact that they eventually served other nations and mixed with them.

So why does everyone on TA try to claim such an insignificant people? From Europeans, to Turks, to Iranians, to Kurds. We all have other ancestors that were much more noble and powerful.

Because they were very mixed and shifted ethnically a lot.

In Ancient times they were mostly Iranian tribes, yet by 400 AD they became Slavo-Tatars.

[Miraak]

They're fierce alpha badass warrior riders of the ancient world, they fought and won against many great empires despite being loose nomadic tribes not a powerful united one. Everyone frightened, terrified and shit their pants when they stand accross them on the battlefield. They got badass tattoos, piercings, artworks, artifacts, jewelries, all those golden stuffs, gorgeous amazon babes, a shit ton of weed, etc... The list go on and on.

[Halgurd]

They're fierce alpha badass warrior riders of the ancient world, they fought and won against many great empires despite being loose nomadic tribes not a powerful united one. Everyone frightened, terrified and shit their pants when they stand accross them on the battlefield. They got badass tattoos, piercings, artworks, artifacts, jewelries, all those golden stuffs, gorgeous amazon babes, a shit ton of weed, etc... The list go on and on.

No. This is the narrative TA members try to pull off. In reality they got defeated, assimilated, humiliated wherever they went.

[Dr_Maul]

Because they were very mixed and shifted ethnically a lot.

In Ancient times they were mostly Iranian tribes, yet by 400 AD they became Slavo-Tatars.

I think only Sarmatians became really Slavicized (Before 400 AD even, I'd say by like 100AD they were probably fully Euro) but Alans remained relatively Iranian until now I'd say (Any groups east of them like Saka and such were assimilated/destroyed by MongolTurks). Although the Sarmatians made up most of the Scythians I think, so its probably safe to say that at least 80% of them became slavicized especially those who settled in Ukraine and eastern europe in general

[Daos777]

No. This is the narrative TA members try to pull off. In reality they got defeated, assimilated, humiliated wherever they went.

No they didn’t they kept their independence for a longggg time and most people would not fuck with them but of course with time they got assimilated as has happened and will happen with any nation in the world.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Halgurd]

No they didn’t they kept their independence for a longggg time and most people would not fuck with them but of course with time they got assimilated as has happened and will happen with any nation in the world.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They won some battles here and there. But eventually they got subdued.

It is well known that the Medes and Persians suffered a lot initially from Scythian attacks. But eventually the Medes subdued the Scythians in West Asia and they even served the Medes against the Assyrian Empire. Many were subsequently assimilated (this is where Kurds claim that many settled in Kurdistan which is probably true).

Years later the Persian Empire under Darius launched a campaign against the Scythians deep into Europe, up to Ukraine, and defeated them once more.

I see nothing but defeat and assimilation here.

[PaleoEuropean]

In the same way that people who claim vikings or other tribes as Celts, Saxons, Goths, Magyars etc

Brave & savages warriors always has fascinated to people

All those cultures had a major impact though, especially the Vikings and Celts.

[Aldaris]

You're not the first one to suggest this but I don't understand why. They sound different. The Indian guy could only talk about how Indian diaspora is superior to other races in USA.

Sean has a more international outlook and is more knowledgeable. He often comments on topics that the Indian guy never touched(eg analyzing wallon vs flemish situation of Belgium in detail in another thread, no indian would do that).
He's obviously an anglo/white guy judging by his posts and interests.

Man, check his cookie cutter style of posting. You're not dumb, Antimage.

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/se...d=11055358&pp=

That Fractal guy had a notorious history of making Anglo-like accounts in the period of like three years since he has joined and was banned. Suddenly, he stops doing that and this new one comes in out of nowhere. With the same patterns of behaviour and everything, but now he's a funding member. Weird set of consequences. Remember him begging me to retract one of my posts which was a joke, but a revealing one for him. And I did that since I'm not a snitch.

Would be fine with me if he was in here to challenge racism against Indians and even going over the edge from time to time, when things go wild, but 'both' of those geniuses just ended up with trolling and lying.