Communism

[Komintasavalta]

Representatives of the world financial international and their accomplices feel some kind of animal hatred for Stalin. We emphasize - to the dead for more than half a century, Stalin. For what? Because he built the first country of socialism in history and showed mankind an alternative way of development, more effective than the way of the West - Yes, this is definitely a reason for hatred.

I thought it was because of this:


https://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=39
Carlo Mattogno: "The Einsatzgruppen in the Occupied Eastern Territories—Genesis, Missions and Actions"

[KirillMazur]

I thought it was because of this:


https://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=39
Carlo Mattogno: "The Einsatzgruppen in the Occupied Eastern Territories—Genesis, Missions and Actions"

I have nothing against ordinary Jews, but there seems to be an inversely proportional relationship in Russia - the larger and more united the collective of Jews (and other minorities) in power and business, the less oxygen in the air for the Slavs. Mutually beneficial symbiosis is possible only up to a certain (not a big) limit. So 1937 is the norm here from time to time.

[KirillMazur]

1. The development of capitalism inevitably leads to crises. Crises are always resolved through war.

2. With each successive crisis, imperialist wars will become more and more destructive.

3. In imperialist wars, the class structure of societies is exposed in the most cruel way: first of all, the poor and the powerless perish, the rich sit in the rear and do not perish.

4. The Russian Empire, which was the backward capitalist state, had no chance of winning the world war. As a semi-colonial power, the Russian Empire was dependent on external creditors, and therefore, with the lives of its soldiers, it was constantly forced to save the allies on the western front.
Even if the Entente won over Germany, Russia would inevitably become the next "patient of Europe" (see the Crimean War).
The technological backwardness of the Russian Empire behind England, the USA, France, Japan (see the Russo-Japanese War) was such that it practically did not leave the state a chance to survive.
The speed with which the Entente accepted the abdication of Nicholas II and then rushed to share the royal inheritance fully confirms these assumptions.

5. In order to prevent another world war (in which one day everyone will die - both Russians and non-Russians), it was necessary to create another, alternative world economic system (USSR).

6. To protect this new world economic system from the inevitable aggression of capitalism, its creators had to make a qualitative breakthrough in science, technology, education, medicine. Every citizen of the new state should feel his own involvement in it, be motivated to defend it. The tsarist government was unable to create such motivation among the people in the First World War (see "The German will not reach the Urals")

7. To build a new world economic system within the boundaries of the RSFSR would be absurd. It wouldn't have survived.
An ideology was required that would rally all the nationalities inhabiting the Russian Empire.
This ideology could not be Russian nationalism, or Orthodoxy, or Imperialism as such.
Neither by force nor by persuasion it was already impossible to drive Turkestan, the Caucasus, Ukraine, etc. under the imperial roof (Denikin, who was attacked by the Georgians of N. Jordania under Adler, will not allow me to lie). Only justice could become the ideology capable of uniting "Russian-Uzbek-Latvian". The state framework is only the Union of Equal Peoples. Union, not Empire.

8. They will inevitably try to strangle the new socio-economic system in a blockade (there is no peaceful coexistence of two systems) if it does not take offensive actions. Hence the mondialist thesis of permanent revolution.
Attention, Orthodox Stalinists: this thesis was never rejected even by Stalin. Stalin only said that first you need to build a state and only then get involved in some kind of revolution.

[KirillMazur]

A good example of the Spanish understanding of communism..
Pablo Hasel about the fight against fascism in modern Spain.

[Kenshiro]

Is cutting off a horses leg to re-shoe it. Prove me wrong.

Socialism, the real one I don't think has ever been applied in human history, modern man is not advanced enough for such a society unfortunately, my ideal model would be marinaleda type (in Andalusia, Spain) a place where people are still given dignity, human life cannot be based entirely on profit, it is a real waste, capitalism only brings hatred, competition and resentment

[Kenshiro]

This is not false, but communism didn't improve it one bit, just made everyone poorer and less free. No, thanks.

Because it hasn't been applied, what are we talking about? in the Soviet Union there was exploitation, there were factories, there was power, there was capitalism, it was on balance a capitalist state badly disguised as a communist state, anarcho socialism, self-organized societies, is that the way to go for a new world and to do this you need a new human being, only then will true social peace arrive and only then can it be applied

[KirillMazur]

To the question of negative selection in the socio-economic system, which goes in unison with "human nature".

Most women are attracted to men with the dark triad, ie. narcissists, psychopaths and machiavellians.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...91886913012245
https://www.researchgate.net/publica...eness_to_women
http://web.simmons.edu/~turnerg/MCC/Matechoice2PDF.pdf

Men who are associated with criminal and engage in anti-social activities have more success with women, more sexual partners and start having sex earlier.
https://web.archive.org/web/20120513...tables/ch8.pdf

Men who have criminal and anti-social behavior breed more successfully.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12625439
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...90513814000774

Serial killers, terrorists and rapists receive thousands of love letters from women to jail.
https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/...-a-2689657.php
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...5917891300061X

Men who are members of criminal gangs have a significantly higher number of female sexual partners than ordinary men.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/...24499509551792
https://www.researchgate.net/publica...onary_approach
https://www.nber.org/papers/w12019

Bullies who did bullying since childhood have significantly greater sexual success in life with women than men who didn't bullying.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/ful...74704915613909
https://www.researchgate.net/publica...of_Personality

39 percent of hospitalized male psychopaths had sexual contact with female mental health workers.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9c5...3f767d1126.pdf

Female prison guards are significantly more likely to harass male prisoners than male prison guards are to harass female prisoners.
https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/svraca0911.pdf

Women who want to marry are largely attracted to men with a narcissistic personality type, and it is these men that they consider the most desirable partners.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...10X?via%3Dihub

Female narcissism reduces the quality of marriage for men and men are more likely to attempt to divorce such a woman after some time and, on the contrary, women are completely satisfied if their marriage partner is a narcissistic man.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26098378

Women have a negative attitude towards men with socially positive character traits, such as kindness, empathy and willingness to invest in relationships, considering such men to be non-sexual, while men, on the contrary, consider women with these character traits more attractive.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs...46167214543879
https://www.newsweek.com/study-finds...-around-261269
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026021

[KirillMazur]

[ugochaves]

To the question of negative selection in the socio-economic system, which goes in unison with "human nature".

Most women are attracted to men with the dark triad, ie. narcissists, psychopaths and machiavellians.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...91886913012245
https://www.researchgate.net/publica...eness_to_women
http://web.simmons.edu/~turnerg/MCC/Matechoice2PDF.pdf

Men who are associated with criminal and engage in anti-social activities have more success with women, more sexual partners and start having sex earlier.
https://web.archive.org/web/20120513...tables/ch8.pdf

Men who have criminal and anti-social behavior breed more successfully.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12625439
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...90513814000774

Serial killers, terrorists and rapists receive thousands of love letters from women to jail.
https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/...-a-2689657.php
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...5917891300061X

Men who are members of criminal gangs have a significantly higher number of female sexual partners than ordinary men.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/...24499509551792
https://www.researchgate.net/publica...onary_approach
https://www.nber.org/papers/w12019

Bullies who did bullying since childhood have significantly greater sexual success in life with women than men who didn't bullying.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/ful...74704915613909
https://www.researchgate.net/publica...of_Personality

39 percent of hospitalized male psychopaths had sexual contact with female mental health workers.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9c5...3f767d1126.pdf

Female prison guards are significantly more likely to harass male prisoners than male prison guards are to harass female prisoners.
https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/svraca0911.pdf

Women who want to marry are largely attracted to men with a narcissistic personality type, and it is these men that they consider the most desirable partners.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...10X?via%3Dihub

Female narcissism reduces the quality of marriage for men and men are more likely to attempt to divorce such a woman after some time and, on the contrary, women are completely satisfied if their marriage partner is a narcissistic man.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26098378

Women have a negative attitude towards men with socially positive character traits, such as kindness, empathy and willingness to invest in relationships, considering such men to be non-sexual, while men, on the contrary, consider women with these character traits more attractive.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs...46167214543879
https://www.newsweek.com/study-finds...-around-261269
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026021

I have no border - a Russian woman, Swedish or Spanish. If this woman doesn't like my very blonde hair and blue eyes + very dark beard (what the hell), she's not Aryan and doesn't attract me...I'm ignored mostly by female scum. Connoisseurs of racial superiority are fighting for me (but there are few of them)

[KirillMazur]

In any developed society, the birth rate will fall - quantity turns into quality.

So many people and workers are no longer needed to ensure economic processes.

One developed and educated citizen works more efficiently and brings more benefits than a hundred stupid apes.

In principle, if civilization had developed, and developed evenly, overpopulation would have been avoided, since the population would have been reduced to an optimal level naturally.

The only thing is that this is possible only with the real achievement of socialism and, in the future, communism.

But globalist capitalists are not at all happy with this situation - they will simply lose their power, influence and wealth.

Since a developed, active and thinking society cannot be subordinated to a bunch of hucksters.

Therefore, now the globalists are actively reducing the most developed part of the population, thereby simply destroying civilization.

And the remaining billions of stupid monkeys are easy to control and manipulate, so reducing their numbers to the proverbial billion will not be a problem.

A billion stupid slaves will fully provide the capitalist elite with both free labor and consumers.

This way they will be able to last long enough, saving the remaining resources without switching to socialism and new, breakthrough technologies.

These, in fact, are the plans of the world elite for the near future. In short.

But this is a one-way trip. Just delaying the inevitable.

Without a transition to a more progressive social system, a scientific and technological leap is impossible.

Capitalists will sooner or later gobble up all resources and lead civilization to collapse and final death.

Capitalism will devour itself.