0
I'm curious as to what you guys think of this matter. For the record, I am only referring to the time period of 395 AD (Formal split) until 1204 (Empire is dismantled by Crusaders). The reasoning behind this is:
Between 330-395 It was basically the same as the Roman Empire, so Latin
From 1204 to 1261, it was just a Venetian Crusader rump state and undeniably Latin
From 1261-1453 it was a Greek Orthodox revival and was undeniably Hellenic/Greek
So what do you guys think? Was the Byzantine Empire of 395-1204 a Latin Successor of Rome or its own Hellenic Empire?
Bookmarks